Mike Schopp

@Schopptalk · Grand Island, NY · joined 26 Aug 2010

3-7 p.m. ET w/ @bulldogwgr on @wgr550 since 2002. @audacy also seen on: @ShipChasing, @DeepEndFF1, @purpleinsider

52 449Followers

992Following

63 060Posts total

38.2KViews on collected posts

Son gönderiler

Mike Schopp@Schopptalk10 Sep

THAT WAS THE THESIS OF THE PLAY 186 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Mike Schopp@Schopptalk10 Sep

Sam Darnold in 2031 after winning a sixth straight Super Bowl: listen no one here is satisfied 3.7K views · 21 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Mike Schopp@Schopptalk8 Sep

Will 49ers-Rams count in the records as a Friday game? It should 3.8K views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Mike Schopp@Schopptalk6 Sep

@Schopptalk How has nobody given the obvious explanation? Chiefs referees. (I’ll leave now.) 382 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Mike Schopp@Schopptalk6 Sep

@Schopptalk Who would have thought the Big 10 would defend Michigan in a controversial and league-embarrassing situation vs. a non-conference team? At the end of the day, it’s all about the Big 10’s reputation and raking in more money. 370 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Mike Schopp@Schopptalk6 Sep

@Schopptalk You know that targeting flag was coming the way Underwood was hit when he released the ball. 1.1K views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Mike Schopp@Schopptalk6 Sep

The Michigan result is so far beyond stupid. They even put a second-plus back on the clock the play before, from :08 to :09. Why? Did anything happen at like 13:12 left in the first quarter we should have inspected? No, because we can't do that to sports. But we can do this 14.4K views · 159 likes · 5 reposts · 18 replies Open on X →

Mike Schopp@Schopptalk6 Sep

One reason why teams were infinity-0 in these situations is that we never had any inclination (or ability) to go back and check everything that happens in a sporting event. It's all replay culture's fault 14.2K views · 30 likes · 1 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →

Aynı büyüklükteki hesaplara karşı

Son 90 güne ait 8 gönderi, 10K–100K takipçi aralığıyla yan yana. geniş kitleye gösteriliyor, ama izleyenlerin azı tepki veriyor.

Medyan görüntülenme2 432bu hesap99510K–100K için medyan

Erişim, %4.64%bu hesap3.59%10K–100K için medyan

Etkileşim, %0.58%bu hesap1.92%10K–100K için medyan

Ölçüt	Bu hesap	10K–100K için medyan	Oran
Gönderi başına medyan görüntülenme	2 432	995	2.44×
Erişim (görüntülenme ÷ takipçi)	4.64%	3.59%	1.29×
Etkileşim oranı	0.58%	1.92%	0.30×

Bu aralıktaki diğer hesaplar → Başka bir hesapla karşılaştır → Bu kıyas değerleri nasıl kuruluyor →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

14.2K6 Sep

14.4K

1.1K

370

382

3.8K8 Sep

3.7K10 Sep

186

Last 8 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.25%6 Sep

1.26%

0.44%

0.54%

1.57%

0.11%8 Sep

0.62%10 Sep

2.69%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.92%.

What the audience does

Likes85.7%227 in total

Reposts2.3%6 in total

Replies10.9%29 in total

Bookmarks1.1%3 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Son gönderiler

Aynı büyüklükteki hesaplara karşı

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Benzer hesaplar