tweetindex
TR

XBOW

@Xbow · Seattle, Washington, USA · joined 22 May 2007

The autonomous offensive security company redefining cyber defense for the AI era.

13 236Followers
17Following
567Posts total
606.7KViews on collected posts

Son gönderiler

XBOW@Xbow
Grok 4.7 is here and we put it through our offensive security benchmarks and workflows. tl;dr: The results were mixed: Grok 4.7 performed worse than 4.6 in some tests, significantly better in others. The biggest difference wasn’t in how it performed, but when. More findings in 1.1K views · 12 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
XBOW@Xbow
It’s no surprise now that AI can find more vulnerabilities than ever. As vulnerability discovery scales, the metrics we use to measure security need to change too. A thread on how AppSec metrics should evolve and what to measure🧵 7.2K views · 58 likes · 5 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
XBOW@Xbow
It doesn't have to be this way 🤭 https://t.co/1NOeI4R1Vz
1.5K views · 9 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
XBOW@Xbow
What is the current state of bug bounties in 2026? How is AI changing the landscape? 🐛 We invited @caseyjohnellis, founder of @Bugcrowd to discuss with @fede_k in the latest episode of Offense Taken. Watch the full episode here: https://t.co/c2n2XJGlzh https://t.co/veTbkSxL1t
1:11
1.3K views · 4 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
XBOW@Xbow
Did AI create the vulnapocalypse — or expose it? 🤔 2.2K views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
XBOW@Xbow
How to build an offsec agent - according to @moyix: 🔦Gaslight ⛩️Gatekeep 💅Girlboss A thread🧵 19.9K views · 205 likes · 35 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
🚲 https://t.co/rqukpImR59
1.5K views · 10 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
A 250k calculator. Full blog post awaiting embargo 😎 https://t.co/ogFxV14AZa
0:51
336.9K views · 938 likes · 76 reposts · 27 replies Open on X →
@Xbow Super impressive. Well done! 👏🏻 2.1K views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@Xbow Crazy. Just waiting for the Writeup! Browser sandbox exploitation is pretty uncommon. Also congrats!! 4.2K views · 10 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@Xbow Good to see this Team. Congratulations. 3.5K views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
This just in: XBOW's Native Team has claimed the first Chrome Full Chain Exploit Bonus this year. Only four will be awarded in 2026. ⚡️ https://t.co/JYpPnZtesi 200.5K views · 651 likes · 69 reposts · 12 replies Open on X →
@Xbow the fix is what actually decides it though. one patch closes both and theyre one finding, separate patches and theyre two. all four views read the text of the finding, so youre approximating the root cause rather than testing it 275 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
4/ Preventing cross-view pollution Early versions of the findings still included URLs and paths in the description, even though those details were also present in the location view. Repeated templates and boilerplate language appeared across descriptions, reproduction steps, and 713 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
5/ Read the full process + details on our blog: https://t.co/wDJzAqawGa https://t.co/oIB7w5JV6H 699 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
2/ Why embedding the entire finding is not enough Embeddings were a natural starting point for de-duplication because they map related findings closer together in a mathematical space, but embedding an entire finding as a single block of text introduced too much noise. A 722 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
3/ Breaking each finding into independent views Instead of treating a finding as one piece of text, we projected it into four independent views: • Description: the nature of the vulnerability • Reproduction: how it can be triggered • Location: where it occurs • Impact: what 508 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
1/ The de-duplication problem is context-dependent A rule that correctly groups application-wide error disclosures might incorrectly collapse distinct XSS findings. On the other hand, a rule designed to preserve each XSS injection point might produce dozens of redundant reports 1.7K views · 7 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
One of the less obvious challenges that comes with finding vulnerabilities at scale is deciding when two findings are actually the same vulnerability. XBOW can encounter the same underlying weakness across different endpoints, parameters, users, and workflows, filters out 9K views · 53 likes · 5 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
can you relate? https://t.co/jzjRZNs1Kn 1.9K views · 15 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
XBOW@Xbow
Caption this: https://t.co/V1adRxk9rT 5.6K views · 11 likes · 2 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
XBOW@Xbow
🤝 3.6K views · 14 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Aynı büyüklükteki hesaplara karşı

Son 90 güne ait 22 gönderi, 10K–100K takipçi aralığıyla yan yana. geniş kitleye gösteriliyor, ama izleyenlerin azı tepki veriyor.

Medyan görüntülenme1 992bu hesap92410K–100K için medyan
Erişim, %15.05%bu hesap3.62%10K–100K için medyan
Etkileşim, %0.44%bu hesap1.52%10K–100K için medyan
ÖlçütBu hesap10K–100K için medyanOran
Gönderi başına medyan görüntülenme1 9929242.16×
Erişim (görüntülenme ÷ takipçi)15.05%3.62%4.16×
Etkileşim oranı0.44%1.52%0.29×

Bu aralıktaki diğer hesaplar →   Başka bir hesapla karşılaştır →   Bu kıyas değerleri nasıl kuruluyor →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

7132 Sep
275
200.5K
3.5K
4.2K
2.1K3 Sep
336.9K8 Sep
1.5K9 Sep
19.9K11 Sep
2.2K14 Sep
1.3K15 Sep
1.5K17 Sep
7.2K18 Sep
1.1K21 Sep

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.42%2 Sep
0.36%
0.38%
0.23%
0.24%
0.38%3 Sep
0.32%8 Sep
0.67%9 Sep
1.23%11 Sep
0.09%14 Sep
0.47%15 Sep
0.69%17 Sep
0.89%18 Sep
1.30%21 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes63.6%2 025 in total
Reposts6.2%198 in total
Replies1.8%56 in total
Quotes2.2%71 in total
Bookmarks26.2%833 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

Followers by day

16 Sep

Daily snapshots since 16 Sep 2026; the dashed line is the starting count.

Benzer hesaplar