John Hawks ✓

@johnhawks · Wisconsin · joined 01 Jul 2009

I'm a paleoanthropologist. I explore human fossils and genomes to understand where we came from and what we share with our ancestors.

35 805Followers

247Following

25 915Posts total

108.7KViews on collected posts

Son gönderiler

John Hawks ✓@johnhawks31 Aug

Dunbar’s number is one of those concepts that is just further entrenched by every demonstration that it’s not true. The final boss of 1990s pop science myths. 5.6K views · 30 likes · 7 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

John Hawks ✓@johnhawks28 Aug

The famous limit of 150 friends a human brain can supposedly hold turns out to rest on a calculation too wide to support any specific number, let alone the one everyone quotes https://t.co/BhMhNTpO3z 6.6K views · 36 likes · 10 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

John Hawks ✓@johnhawks26 Aug

@johnhawks Paleoanthropology needs to abandon the notion of a geographical "origin" - a very simplistic monolineage concept invalidated by overwhelming fossil and molecular evidence of a complex reticulate network for the entire recognized Homo existence period. Even at (much) 1.2K views · 16 likes · 4 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

John Hawks ✓@johnhawks26 Aug

@johnhawks There have always been two races, African and Eurasian. “According to Hawks' speculation, the stems were likely African. One scenario places the majority (~80%) group in southwest Asia (Levant) and the minority in East or southern Africa, separated by the Sahara. Fos 2K views · 11 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

John Hawks ✓@johnhawks26 Aug

@johnhawks It's a beautiful picture you paint. So much time and geography. Of course we get only a pin hole view. We are blessed for this view. This is science communication at its highest form. 4.3K views · 15 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

John Hawks ✓@johnhawks25 Aug

“In broad strokes, it appears that the modern human population evolved from a merger of two ancient groups around 300,000 years ago, roughly 80% from one, and 20% from the other.” Who were these stem populations? Here is some informed speculation. https://t.co/8LjHgCmofQ 71.9K views · 666 likes · 117 reposts · 32 replies Open on X →

John Hawks ✓@johnhawks25 Aug

@johnhawks https://t.co/irrJslau7c I'm blown away by the latest research about modern human origins tbh 18 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

John Hawks ✓@johnhawks9 Aug

@johnhawks Why not question radiocarbon over U-series dating at this time depth and in this context? 379 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

John Hawks ✓@johnhawks9 Aug

@johnhawks imagine the Denisovan fossils we've lost to consumption by Chinese medicine followers 286 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

John Hawks ✓@johnhawks9 Aug

Two new Denisovan fossils have emerged from the seafloor of the Penghu Strait, near Taiwan. I look at what these tell us about the survival of Denisovans into the time frame of the “classic” Neanderthals. https://t.co/pOkJ8ISjZC 8.4K views · 161 likes · 35 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →

John Hawks ✓@johnhawks6 Aug

“An average effect size of 285 grams per copy means that around 200,000 metric tons of human muscle can be attributed to this Neanderthal inheritance. That’s two aircraft carriers worth of mass.” https://t.co/LkoaRphG6o 5.8K views · 49 likes · 17 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

John Hawks ✓@johnhawks2 Aug

The story of “The petite bodies of the robust australopithecines” is changing in light of the last 15 years of evidence, and footprints are leading the way. https://t.co/cwivRyKunM 2.3K views · 27 likes · 10 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →

Aynı büyüklükteki hesaplara karşı

Son 90 güne ait 12 gönderi, 10K–100K takipçi aralığıyla yan yana. geniş kitleye gösteriliyor, ama izleyenlerin azı tepki veriyor.

Medyan görüntülenme3 272bu hesap92410K–100K için medyan

Erişim, %9.14%bu hesap3.62%10K–100K için medyan

Etkileşim, %1.10%bu hesap1.52%10K–100K için medyan

Ölçüt	Bu hesap	10K–100K için medyan	Oran
Gönderi başına medyan görüntülenme	3 272	924	3.54×
Erişim (görüntülenme ÷ takipçi)	9.14%	3.62%	2.52×
Etkileşim oranı	1.10%	1.52%	0.72×

Bu aralıktaki diğer hesaplar → Başka bir hesapla karşılaştır → Bu kıyas değerleri nasıl kuruluyor →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

2.3K2 Aug

5.8K6 Aug

8.4K9 Aug

286

379

1825 Aug

71.9K

4.3K26 Aug

1.2K

6.6K28 Aug

5.6K31 Aug

Last 12 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.80%2 Aug

1.19%6 Aug

2.45%9 Aug

1.05%

0.53%

5.56%25 Aug

1.15%

0.38%26 Aug

0.60%

1.80%

0.75%28 Aug

0.71%31 Aug

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes59.2%1 015 in total

Reposts11.7%200 in total

Replies2.9%50 in total

Quotes1.3%22 in total

Bookmarks25.0%428 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Son gönderiler

Aynı büyüklükteki hesaplara karşı

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Benzer hesaplar