Sandeep Vaheesan

@sandeepvaheesan · Washington, DC · joined 17 Feb 2014

Legal director @openmarkets. Fellow @cplusci. Advisory council @PeoplesParity. Former @CFPB. All opinions are my own.

11 556Followers

2 493Following

19 079Posts total

16.5KViews on collected posts

Son gönderiler

Sandeep Vaheesan@sandeepvaheesan21 Sep

In court, Microsoft honestly describes what LLMs do https://t.co/G7RyhC3nkJ

907 views · 19 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Sandeep Vaheesan@sandeepvaheesan18 Sep

They really don't want to file the S-1 . . . 1.6K views · 15 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Sandeep Vaheesan@sandeepvaheesan18 Sep

This is blatantly wrong 1. Decisions interpreting the Sherman Act do not govern the Clayton and FTC Acts (they're three separate statutes) 2. Lower courts are not free to ignore on-point Supreme Court precedents "Antitrust world" should read D.C. Circuit's 2017 Anthem decision

1.9K views · 8 likes · 4 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Sandeep Vaheesan@sandeepvaheesan18 Sep

@danielahanley Oh gosh, I never heard that before. Believe it all you want. It’s a dreamworld. Except for a couple of outliers like yourself, the antitrust world has understood for decades that your reading of these cases is inconsistent with post 1960s Supreme Court decisions. 2.1K views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Sandeep Vaheesan@sandeepvaheesan17 Sep

In @techpolicypress, I write that the two government antitrust cases against Google resulted in winning lawsuits but losing the larger fight against the company's illegal dominance, due to weak remedies from the judges https://t.co/JES4kkE48p

1.7K views · 18 likes · 10 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Sandeep Vaheesan@sandeepvaheesan10 Sep

Promo code: UCPNEW https://t.co/lJYKBvCjrB 251 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Sandeep Vaheesan@sandeepvaheesan10 Sep

My book Democracy in Power: A History of Electrification in the United States will be out in paperback on October 12! https://t.co/SczJNTsARN

8K views · 276 likes · 40 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Aynı büyüklükteki hesaplara karşı

Son 90 güne ait 7 gönderi, 10K–100K takipçi aralığıyla yan yana. geniş kitleye gösteriliyor, ama izleyenlerin azı tepki veriyor.

Medyan görüntülenme1 670bu hesap92410K–100K için medyan

Erişim, %14.45%bu hesap3.62%10K–100K için medyan

Etkileşim, %1.08%bu hesap1.52%10K–100K için medyan

Ölçüt	Bu hesap	10K–100K için medyan	Oran
Gönderi başına medyan görüntülenme	1 670	924	1.81×
Erişim (görüntülenme ÷ takipçi)	14.45%	3.62%	3.99×
Etkileşim oranı	1.08%	1.52%	0.71×

Bu aralıktaki diğer hesaplar → Başka bir hesapla karşılaştır → Bu kıyas değerleri nasıl kuruluyor →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

8K10 Sep

251

1.7K17 Sep

2.1K18 Sep

1.9K

1.6K

90721 Sep

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

3.96%10 Sep

0.80%

1.74%17 Sep

0.09%18 Sep

0.68%

1.08%

2.32%21 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes67.5%338 in total

Reposts11.6%58 in total

Replies0.8%4 in total

Quotes0.4%2 in total

Bookmarks19.8%99 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Son gönderiler

Aynı büyüklükteki hesaplara karşı

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Benzer hesaplar