Alex Shevchenko 🇺🇦 ✓

@AlexAuroraDev · joined 06 Jul 2017

GM, NEAR Intents; views are my own Everything here is not a financial advice. DYOR.

32 684Followers

432Following

4 017Posts total

36KViews on collected posts

Against accounts of the same size

7 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. ordinary reach for its size, weaker reaction than most.

Median views2 381this account2 578median for 10K–100K

Reach, %7.28%this account7.77%median for 10K–100K

Engagement, %1.02%this account1.47%median for 10K–100K

Metric	This account	Median for 10K–100K	Ratio
Median views per post	2 381	2 578	0.92×
Reach (views ÷ followers)	7.28%	7.77%	0.94×
Engagement rate	1.02%	1.47%	0.69×

Others in this range → Compare with another account → How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

17.3K1 Sep

9.8K2 Sep

1.3K

2.8K

2.4K3 Sep

1.2K

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.88%1 Sep

1.21%2 Sep

0.90%

0.47%

1.02%

2.27%3 Sep

2.15%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.47%.

What the audience does

Likes69.5%328 in total

Reposts4.9%23 in total

Replies7.6%36 in total

Quotes1.7%8 in total

Bookmarks16.3%77 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Latest posts

3rd of September. Rowan bonfires canceled. ZEC is on fire instead. https://t.co/cWG1KsZmpl 1.2K views · 23 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies 03 Sep 2026 This is wrong. This research doesn’t mention that besides the best fee: 1. Swap is confidential 2. All participants are checked for use questionable liquidity, so a user won’t get bad money 3. The reliability of Intents (probability that everything will go as planned) is 99.999% 2.4K views · 50 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies 03 Sep 2026 Do your own research and come to @near_intents Source: @OpenChainBench https://t.co/BE7i7MLNOq 2.8K views · 24 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies 02 Sep 2026 It definitely is and from time to time this thought keeps me up at night 1.3K views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies 02 Sep 2026 Do your duty, come what may 1.3K views · 11 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies 02 Sep 2026 One of our partners, Peer, has enabled NEAR Intents to power ZEC settlement. This means users can pay on Cash App, Revolut, Wise or PayPal and have ZEC delivered directly to their wallet. A nice example of the kind of payment and settlement flow NEAR Intents enable across 9.8K views · 107 likes · 7 reposts · 3 replies 02 Sep 2026 Did everyone already forget this? Rogue AIs don't need to hack any AWS boxes to self-replicate in the wild. Self-custodial crypto wallets and permissionless GPU clouds (e.g. NEAR, Akash, ionet, etc.) already provide all the infrastructure they'd need today. Use crypto to pay h 17.3K views · 107 likes · 11 reposts · 29 replies 01 Sep 2026