Center for AI Safety

@CAIS · San Francisco · joined 23 Aug 2022

Reducing societal-scale risks from AI.

10 835Followers

3Following

324Posts total

9.1MViews on collected posts

Against accounts of the same size

7 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. shown widely, but few of those viewers react.

Median views11 736this account2 896median for 10K–100K

Reach, %108.32%this account9.51%median for 10K–100K

Engagement, %0.80%this account1.56%median for 10K–100K

Metric	This account	Median for 10K–100K	Ratio
Median views per post	11 736	2 896	4.05×
Reach (views ÷ followers)	108.32%	9.51%	11.4×
Engagement rate	0.80%	1.56%	0.51×

Others in this range → Compare with another account → How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

3M30 May

11.7K30 Jul

1.9K31 Jul

179.9K11 Aug

5.8M14 Aug

24.8K

3.4K

2203 Sep

Last 8 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.06%30 May

0.80%30 Jul

1.29%31 Jul

0.47%11 Aug

0.42%14 Aug

0.47%

1.18%

2.27%3 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.56%.

What the audience does

Likes76.8%21 393 in total

Reposts10.1%2 808 in total

Replies4.1%1 147 in total

Quotes7.4%2 062 in total

Bookmarks1.7%462 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Latest posts

The Center for AI Safety is hiring! Research Engineer / Research Scientist: You’ll conduct empirical research on frontier AI systems: design experiments, train and evaluate at scale on our compute cluster, and publish at top venues. Research Manager: You are a senior researcher 220 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies 03 Sep 2026 > "We will release the weights in two weeks... once safety evaluation and hardening are complete." Hardening society against AI cyberattacks will take more than two weeks. Defending against AI cyberattacks would require upgrading critical infrastructure and other computers s 3.4K views · 34 likes · 0 reposts · 6 replies 14 Aug 2026 Relying on an AI to "think out loud" (called chain-of-thought monitoring) is not a long-term safety solution. 1. As AI models get larger, more thinking happens deep within their layers before they utter a word. 2. AIs can already alter their chain of thought when prompted, so 24.8K views · 95 likes · 11 reposts · 8 replies 14 Aug 2026 Introducing GLM-5.3: Built to Code. Ready for Cyber Defense. - Top-tier coding and agentic capabilities, achieved through post-training on the 743B base model - A major leap in cybersecurity, setting a new standard among open models Tech Blog: https://t.co/ekQkO83jCv https://t. 5.8M views · 19.4K likes · 2.4K reposts · 951 replies 14 Aug 2026 2) Illegible reasoning: We confirm prior reports by @ApolloResearch: OpenAI models sometimes reason in alien-like language, referring to themselves as “we” or “it,” or spiraling into cursed loops of “vantages,” “marinades,” and “watchers.” CoT-monitoring people are doing God’s 179.9K views · 730 likes · 48 reposts · 21 replies 11 Aug 2026 What does a "fixed empirical threshold" actually look like? A model could be considered unsafe to release if (Capabilities > X) AND [ (Refusal Rate < Y) OR (Jailbreak Success Rate > Z) ] The Virology Capabilities Test or ExploitGym could measure hazardous biological or 1.9K views · 17 likes · 4 reposts · 3 replies 31 Jul 2026 AI corporations are steadily increasing malicious use risks by arguing that because the marginal risk of their model release is low, there is nothing to worry about. This “marginal risk” justification is bad for three reasons. 1. No one knows how to compute it. Which hazardous 11.7K views · 75 likes · 9 reposts · 7 replies 30 Jul 2026 We’ve released a statement on the risk of extinction from AI. Signatories include: - Three Turing Award winners - Authors of the standard textbooks on AI/DL/RL - CEOs and Execs from OpenAI, Microsoft, Google, Google DeepMind, Anthropic - Many more https://t.co/mkJWhCRVwB 3M views · 1.1K likes · 350 reposts · 149 replies 30 May 2023