tweetindex

Mark Zlochin - מארק זלוצ'ין༝

@MarkZlochin · Earth (or so I think) · joined 18 Feb 2009

Analyst and organizational consultant. Former AI researcher and incorrigible data geek.

10 158Followers
1 072Following
89 109Posts total
170.7KViews on collected posts

Against accounts of the same size

9 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. shown far beyond its own audience, and the audience reacts.

Median views2 887this account2 747median for 10K–100K
Reach, %28.42%this account8.35%median for 10K–100K
Engagement, %3.87%this account1.45%median for 10K–100K
MetricThis accountMedian for 10K–100KRatio
Median views per post2 8872 7471.05×
Reach (views ÷ followers)28.42%8.35%3.40×
Engagement rate3.87%1.45%2.68×

Others in this range →   Compare with another account →   How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

46.5K2 Sep
466
8.1K
1.1K
84.9K
2.9K3 Sep
964
24.9K
973

Last 9 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.62%2 Sep
0.43%
2.44%
3.87%
5.67%
5.99%3 Sep
4.77%
1.17%
4.73%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.45%.

What the audience does

Likes67.8%4 022 in total
Reposts26.5%1 572 in total
Replies3.1%185 in total
Quotes2.0%121 in total
Bookmarks0.6%36 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Latest posts

Also, "no serious observer can doubt" is an extremely lazy rhetorical sleight of hand, meant to obscure the fact that this "expert" cannot actually prove his key claim about intentionality, without which the whole genocide narrative completely falls apart. https://t.co/O53CID8f3C 973 views · 40 likes · 3 reposts · 3 replies 03 Sep 2026 This is more nonsense from @martinshawx. And @simonmontefiore is correct. What Martin is ignoring (quite intentionally) the word “deliberately” in the Genocide Convention’s actus reus listing (not examples) that he cites to. The word “deliberately” is a key indicator of the 24.9K views · 242 likes · 32 reposts · 14 replies 03 Sep 2026 To borrow the crypto-antisemites' own turn of phrase: using the name of the world's only Jewish state as a slur - a placeholder for whatever is considered the epitome of evil at the moment - is spiritually antisemitic. https://t.co/IsZDfOlTBI 964 views · 38 likes · 7 reposts · 0 replies 03 Sep 2026 This is how Alice Nderitu herself described the bullying campaign she was subjected to from within the UN for refusing to abandon the legal standards and go along with the herd: "This push that I should say that there's a genocide going on in Gaza?... I was hounded, day in, day 2.9K views · 124 likes · 48 reposts · 0 replies 03 Sep 2026 Alice Nderitu. Most people don't know that name. I talk about her all the time. Why is she important? She was one of the world's preeminent experts on genocide. She's a Kenyan woman, not a Jew, not married to a Jew, obviously not Israeli. She rose in the ranks of https://t. 84.9K views · 3.2K likes · 1.4K reposts · 83 replies 02 Sep 2026 If Israel had even remotely competent strategic communications, the anniversary of the 2001 Durban Conference would've been marked by an all-out campaign exposing that stain on the UN's history. But alas... 1.1K views · 36 likes · 6 reposts · 1 replies 02 Sep 2026 On Sept. 28, the U.N. will celebrate 25 years since the infamous Durban Conference — a process tainted by antisemitism and the demonization of Israel. “The U.N. poisons its good name by associating with Durban in any way.” — @AmbUNReform Jeff Bartos https://t.co/g7mAQTd5EJ 8.1K views · 153 likes · 36 reposts · 5 replies 02 Sep 2026 רק לי זה נראה ש"גורם צבאי שנחשף לפרוטוקולים" מחרטט כאן? "הגורם תיאר כי על פי הפרוטוקול, נתניהו עודכן באופן מיידי - ואשרר את תוכנית התקיפה האופרטיבית... התקיפה הזו נעשית - לפי הפרוטוקול - בשעה 06:20... בסוריה, יש לציין, דיווחו באותו בוקר על תקיפות באזור דמשק סביב השעה 09:00..." 466 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies 02 Sep 2026 גורם צבאי שנחשף לפרוטוקולים דוחה את גרסת איזנקוט על הפלת המטוס: נתניהו עודכן מיד ואישר הכול https://t.co/PTRNdfWdyr https://t.co/AghZ4cDUMh 46.5K views · 161 likes · 22 reposts · 79 replies 02 Sep 2026

Similar accounts