Jason Willick ✓

@jawillick · joined 10 Nov 2011

Washington Post columnist. Law, politics, foreign policy. Email: jason.willick@washpost.com

11 294Followers

1 079Following

20 599Posts total

9.4KViews on collected posts

Against accounts of the same size

8 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. shown widely, but few of those viewers react.

Median views638this account1 045median for 10K–100K

Reach, %5.64%this account3.41%median for 10K–100K

Engagement, %0.79%this account2.02%median for 10K–100K

Metric	This account	Median for 10K–100K	Ratio
Median views per post	638	1 045	0.61×
Reach (views ÷ followers)	5.64%	3.41%	1.66×
Engagement rate	0.79%	2.02%	0.39×

Others in this range → Compare with another account → How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

8931 Sep

3.7K

382

190

229

1.4K

2.2K2 Sep

3813 Sep

Last 8 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.34%1 Sep

1.15%

1.05%

1.31%

0.36%

0.18%2 Sep

0.52%3 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 2.02%.

What the audience does

Likes56.0%47 in total

Reposts7.1%6 in total

Replies14.3%12 in total

Quotes1.2%1 in total

Bookmarks21.4%18 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

Followers by day

4 Sep

Daily snapshots since 04 Sep 2026; the dashed line is the starting count.

Latest posts

Abolishing the Senate Has Been Tried Before by @maddentf https://t.co/dYLstZo3od via @WSJopinion 381 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies 03 Sep 2026 · Open on X →

Really smart essay https://t.co/oDyYIrupou 2.2K views · 3 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies 02 Sep 2026 · Open on X →

It might have been easier for the Supreme Court to stop Trump’s ballroom if the construction weren’t bringing the capital city’s iconography closer in line with an alarming political reality. https://t.co/TltumkWKFa 1.4K views · 4 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies 01 Sep 2026 · Open on X →

@jawillick I'm here to tell you, she is a bear on standing. See Murthy v. Missouri. 229 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies 01 Sep 2026 · Open on X →

@jawillick It's summer break, so they're moving slowly. 190 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies 01 Sep 2026 · Open on X →

@jawillick Roberts: "Amy, come on, look at who we are dealing with. Dude hates the Constitution; wants Congress and this Court to drop dead; and doesn't give a shit about the rule of law." ABC: "Your correct. But I pissed him off before and paid a heavy price. Gotta protect my f 382 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies 01 Sep 2026 · Open on X →

Interesting how long it took court for a relatively short ballroom opinion. Deadline the 21st, but court only gave an unexplained stay that day. Now come 14 pages. Suggests a lot of back and forth held things up—not, as some thought, a lengthy liberal dissent. My uninformed guess 3.7K views · 33 likes · 4 reposts · 5 replies 01 Sep 2026 · Open on X →

Washington Post editorial on Trump’s narrow ballroom win https://t.co/dzzi0IpEQb 893 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies 01 Sep 2026 · Open on X →