Sebastien Vegefreak

@sebecotalks

Politiques éco & basket 🏀. Opinions personnelles.

60Followers

201Following

6 102Posts total

142.6KViews on collected posts

Against accounts of the same size

6 posts from the last 90 days, next to the under 10K follower range. shown far beyond its own audience, and the audience reacts.

Median views5 652this account7 264median for under 10K

Reach, %9419.17%this account475.35%median for under 10K

Engagement, %9.90%this account0.97%median for under 10K

Metric	This account	Median for under 10K	Ratio
Median views per post	5 652	7 264	0.78×
Reach (views ÷ followers)	94.2× audience	4.8× audience	19.8×
Engagement rate	9.90%	0.97%	10.2×

Others in this range → Compare with another account → How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

102K2 Sep

29.1K

11.1K3 Sep

224

163

109

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.37%2 Sep

13.40%

0.22%3 Sep

9.38%

10.43%

13.76%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for under 10K accounts is 0.97%.

What the audience does

Likes78.0%3 465 in total

Reposts14.5%646 in total

Replies4.8%212 in total

Quotes0.6%28 in total

Bookmarks2.0%89 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Latest posts

@sebecotalks @ChrisMartzWX What is clear is the books are cooked. Fact: Every single climate alarmist prediction has failed. No exceptions. At this point, the only honest position is there is no climate crisis. #ClimateScam 109 views · 15 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies 03 Sep 2026 @sebecotalks @ChrisMartzWX Possibly because every single climate doomsday prediction has been proven wrong. For the past, oh, fifty or sixty years at least. The boy who cried wolf had NOTHING on the climastrologists. 163 views · 17 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies 03 Sep 2026 @sebecotalks @ChrisMartzWX Science is not clear, more people die from cold than heat, how do you get the difference is negative? 224 views · 20 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies 03 Sep 2026 @ChrisMartzWX Calling it BS doesn't make it so, and caps lock isn't a source. I've read the IPCC reports and they don't say what you claim. The science is clear: every fraction of a degree costs lives. The real question is why we refuse to act. 11.1K views · 5 likes · 1 reposts · 17 replies 03 Sep 2026 This is BS. Humanity isn’t going to die off because the planet is 1.5°C warmer than it was a century and a half ago. There is literally ZERO science to support this claim; it’s not even supported by the United Nations’ own IPCC reports. 29.1K views · 3.2K likes · 562 reposts · 78 replies 02 Sep 2026 “The fight for 1.5 degrees is the fight for humanity,” UN Secretary-General António Guterres warns. A new @UNEP report says the world must double down on action now to avoid an oncoming climate catastrophe. https://t.co/IDE6XVBFIh 102K views · 164 likes · 82 reposts · 117 replies 02 Sep 2026