tweetindex
DE

Diogo Almeida ✓

@CompleteSkeptic

Sane + 🌶️ takes in an insane AI world... AI capabilities researcher: co-created RLHF/ChatGPT @ @openai now trying to right the wrong 🤭 (ceo @typesafeai)

143 608Followers
95Following
531Posts total
5.8MViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

@CompleteSkeptic how do we get this in opencode 15.8K views · 624 likes · 2 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
@CompleteSkeptic Okay, this is gonna sound incredibly dumb, but I have to ask. If it cannot create text, what's with the text that I'm looking at on the left-hand side of the screen.... 6.7K views · 69 likes · 0 reposts · 8 replies Open on X →
@CompleteSkeptic If the point is speed, why not compare against equally fast models? 2.2K views · 17 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@CompleteSkeptic hello world 303.9K views · 2.5K likes · 29 reposts · 70 replies Open on X →
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence so check out our release blog for more technical info: https://t.co/Q2q2PnTbnx Join our waitlist for early access: https://t.co/BgtoeIbiV2 Have technical chats and meme with us on Discord (rumors are good memers skip the 642.6K views · 3.9K likes · 200 reposts · 162 replies Open on X →
Game: race from one Wikipedia page to another using only links Challenge: choosing between hundreds to thousands of links Shows not just intelligence-per-second, but also the compounding benefits of not hallucinating with high-cardinality choices https://t.co/QfMKWhOlVB
4:03
640.6K views · 2.7K likes · 74 reposts · 25 replies Open on X →
We love how this doomo doomonstrates real-time intelligence and what can be doone with code + AI! ~10 calls/sec = ~$7/hour https://t.co/nlffKxGzCB
2:42
1.3M views · 5K likes · 248 reposts · 99 replies Open on X →
The gains aren’t free: Jev can't generate text Comparing Jev vs LLMs side-by-side makes the trade-off clear Fun fact: replacing sequential computation with parallel is the same way Transformers leapfrogged RNNs https://t.co/ockGnenCPP
0:14
2.1M views · 6.2K likes · 160 reposts · 82 replies Open on X →
We believe that the future is code + AI, so made workflow evals to reflect that Jev costs: $42 / BILLION input tokens ($0.042 / MTok) and output tokens are free (forever - they’re too cheap to meter with our new architecture) Jev is named after Jevons paradox and off the https:
811.2K views · 3.7K likes · 161 reposts · 52 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

9 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 100K–1M Follower. wird weit gezeigt, aber nur wenige dieser Zuschauer reagieren.

Medianaufrufe640 590dieses Konto5 983Median für 100K–1M
Reichweite, %446.07%dieses Konto1.49%Median für 100K–1M
Interaktion, %0.67%dieses Konto0.93%Median für 100K–1M
KennzahlDieses KontoMedian für 100K–1MVerhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag640 5905 983107×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)4.5× audience1.49%299×
Interaktionsrate0.67%0.93%0.72×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe →   Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen →   Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

811.2K15 Sep
2.1M
1.3M
640.6K
642.6K
303.9K
2.2K
6.7K
15.8K

Last 9 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.49%15 Sep
0.31%
0.43%
0.44%
0.67%
0.86%
0.86%
1.16%
4.03%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes73.9%24 684 in total
Reposts2.6%874 in total
Replies1.5%507 in total
Quotes1.5%487 in total
Bookmarks20.5%6 842 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Ähnliche Konten