tweetindex
IT

Diogo Almeida ✓

@CompleteSkeptic

Sane + 🌶️ takes in an insane AI world... AI capabilities researcher: co-created RLHF/ChatGPT @ @openai now trying to right the wrong 🤭 (ceo @typesafeai)

143 608Followers
95Following
531Posts total
5.8MViews on collected posts

Ultimi post

@CompleteSkeptic how do we get this in opencode 15.8K views · 624 likes · 2 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
@CompleteSkeptic Okay, this is gonna sound incredibly dumb, but I have to ask. If it cannot create text, what's with the text that I'm looking at on the left-hand side of the screen.... 6.7K views · 69 likes · 0 reposts · 8 replies Open on X →
@CompleteSkeptic If the point is speed, why not compare against equally fast models? 2.2K views · 17 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@CompleteSkeptic hello world 303.9K views · 2.5K likes · 29 reposts · 70 replies Open on X →
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence so check out our release blog for more technical info: https://t.co/Q2q2PnTbnx Join our waitlist for early access: https://t.co/BgtoeIbiV2 Have technical chats and meme with us on Discord (rumors are good memers skip the 642.6K views · 3.9K likes · 200 reposts · 162 replies Open on X →
Game: race from one Wikipedia page to another using only links Challenge: choosing between hundreds to thousands of links Shows not just intelligence-per-second, but also the compounding benefits of not hallucinating with high-cardinality choices https://t.co/QfMKWhOlVB
4:03
640.6K views · 2.7K likes · 74 reposts · 25 replies Open on X →
We love how this doomo doomonstrates real-time intelligence and what can be doone with code + AI! ~10 calls/sec = ~$7/hour https://t.co/nlffKxGzCB
2:42
1.3M views · 5K likes · 248 reposts · 99 replies Open on X →
The gains aren’t free: Jev can't generate text Comparing Jev vs LLMs side-by-side makes the trade-off clear Fun fact: replacing sequential computation with parallel is the same way Transformers leapfrogged RNNs https://t.co/ockGnenCPP
0:14
2.1M views · 6.2K likes · 160 reposts · 82 replies Open on X →
We believe that the future is code + AI, so made workflow evals to reflect that Jev costs: $42 / BILLION input tokens ($0.042 / MTok) and output tokens are free (forever - they’re too cheap to meter with our new architecture) Jev is named after Jevons paradox and off the https:
811.2K views · 3.7K likes · 161 reposts · 52 replies Open on X →

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

9 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di 100K–1M follower. arriva a molti, ma pochi di loro reagiscono.

Visualizzazioni mediane640 590questo account5 983mediana per 100K–1M
Copertura, %446.07%questo account1.49%mediana per 100K–1M
Interazione, %0.67%questo account0.93%mediana per 100K–1M
MetricaQuesto accountMediana per 100K–1MRapporto
Visualizzazioni mediane per post640 5905 983107×
Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower)4.5× audience1.49%299×
Tasso di interazione0.67%0.93%0.72×

Altri account di questa fascia →   Confronta con un altro account →   Come sono costruiti questi parametri →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

811.2K15 Sep
2.1M
1.3M
640.6K
642.6K
303.9K
2.2K
6.7K
15.8K

Last 9 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.49%15 Sep
0.31%
0.43%
0.44%
0.67%
0.86%
0.86%
1.16%
4.03%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes73.9%24 684 in total
Reposts2.6%874 in total
Replies1.5%507 in total
Quotes1.5%487 in total
Bookmarks20.5%6 842 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Account simili