tweetindex
DE

ICR ✓

@ICRscience · Dallas, TX · joined 01 Jul 2011

Discover How Science Confirms the Bible #DallasCreationMuseum: @ICRdiscovery

22 687Followers
19Following
28 906Posts total
3.8KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

@ICRscience By ignoring all data and simply reading of religious text, we selectively choose 6000 years old. 9 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@ICRscience Zircon crystals trap uranium when they crystallize, but strictly exclude lead. Over time, trapped uranium decays into lead at a known rate. Measuring this U-Pb ratio in Earth's oldest zircons yields an unalterable atomic clock dating back 4.4 billion years. 18 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@ICRscience If this is true, why is it that experts in all of the fields related to what you are saying disagree with you 34 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
A thorough examination of scientific data and ancient history affirms the young earth described in Genesis. 863 views · 40 likes · 9 reposts · 17 replies Open on X →
DNA contains instructions, but God provides life. 681 views · 25 likes · 5 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
@ICRscience How? Sedimentary layers form through erosion and redepositon. That can't happen when everything is submerged in water. 41 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@ICRscience According to AiG the flood experts. The Noah flood occurred 4,400yrs ago. The Pyramids of Giza are older. Why weren’t they washed away? Why did the Egyptians survive global annihilation? Because it’s a story with no connection to reality. 20 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
How science is often driven by agenda... https://t.co/dICt5lCfEq
0:32
525 views · 17 likes · 4 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
@ICRscience No it doesn't, you are just full of shit. 11 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Noah’s Flood explains the vast rock layers across the globe. 913 views · 73 likes · 14 reposts · 11 replies Open on X →
True scientific inquiry remains limited because it can only directly test repeatable and observable phenomena. 696 views · 26 likes · 6 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

11 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. erreicht weniger Menschen als vergleichbare Konten, bindet sie aber deutlich stärker.

Medianaufrufe41dieses Konto924Median für 10K–100K
Reichweite, %0.18%dieses Konto3.62%Median für 10K–100K
Interaktion, %9.76%dieses Konto1.52%Median für 10K–100K
KennzahlDieses KontoMedian für 10K–100KVerhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag419240.04×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)0.18%3.62%0.05×
Interaktionsrate9.76%1.52%6.41×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe →   Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen →   Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

69614 Sep
913
11
525
20
41
681
86315 Sep
34
18
9

Last 11 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

5.46%14 Sep
10.73%
18.18%
4.57%
10.00%
9.76%
4.99%
7.65%15 Sep
5.88%
16.67%
22.22%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes69.6%195 in total
Reposts13.6%38 in total
Replies15.0%42 in total
Bookmarks1.8%5 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Ähnliche Konten