tweetindex
ES

ICR ✓

@ICRscience · Dallas, TX · joined 01 Jul 2011

Discover How Science Confirms the Bible #DallasCreationMuseum: @ICRdiscovery

22 687Followers
19Following
28 906Posts total
3.8KViews on collected posts

Últimas publicaciones

@ICRscience By ignoring all data and simply reading of religious text, we selectively choose 6000 years old. 9 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@ICRscience Zircon crystals trap uranium when they crystallize, but strictly exclude lead. Over time, trapped uranium decays into lead at a known rate. Measuring this U-Pb ratio in Earth's oldest zircons yields an unalterable atomic clock dating back 4.4 billion years. 18 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@ICRscience If this is true, why is it that experts in all of the fields related to what you are saying disagree with you 34 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
A thorough examination of scientific data and ancient history affirms the young earth described in Genesis. 863 views · 40 likes · 9 reposts · 17 replies Open on X →
DNA contains instructions, but God provides life. 681 views · 25 likes · 5 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
@ICRscience How? Sedimentary layers form through erosion and redepositon. That can't happen when everything is submerged in water. 41 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@ICRscience According to AiG the flood experts. The Noah flood occurred 4,400yrs ago. The Pyramids of Giza are older. Why weren’t they washed away? Why did the Egyptians survive global annihilation? Because it’s a story with no connection to reality. 20 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
How science is often driven by agenda... https://t.co/dICt5lCfEq
0:32
525 views · 17 likes · 4 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
@ICRscience No it doesn't, you are just full of shit. 11 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Noah’s Flood explains the vast rock layers across the globe. 913 views · 73 likes · 14 reposts · 11 replies Open on X →
True scientific inquiry remains limited because it can only directly test repeatable and observable phenomena. 696 views · 26 likes · 6 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →

Frente a cuentas del mismo tamaño

11 publicaciones de los últimos 90 días, junto al rango de 10K–100K seguidores. llega a menos gente que sus pares, pero los implica mucho más.

Visualizaciones medianas41esta cuenta924mediana de 10K–100K
Alcance, %0.18%esta cuenta3.62%mediana de 10K–100K
Interacción, %9.76%esta cuenta1.52%mediana de 10K–100K
MétricaEsta cuentaMediana de 10K–100KProporción
Visualizaciones medianas por publicación419240.04×
Alcance (visualizaciones ÷ seguidores)0.18%3.62%0.05×
Tasa de interacción9.76%1.52%6.41×

Otras cuentas de este rango →   Comparar con otra cuenta →   Cómo se construyen estas referencias →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

69614 Sep
913
11
525
20
41
681
86315 Sep
34
18
9

Last 11 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

5.46%14 Sep
10.73%
18.18%
4.57%
10.00%
9.76%
4.99%
7.65%15 Sep
5.88%
16.67%
22.22%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes69.6%195 in total
Reposts13.6%38 in total
Replies15.0%42 in total
Bookmarks1.8%5 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Cuentas similares