tweetindex
DE

Sosa Kremenjas ✓

@QBsMVP · 🇨🇦 · joined 06 Jun 2009

News @underdog Ball So Hard U alumni 🇭🇷🇩🇪

25 960Followers
1 324Following
97 353Posts total
1.5MViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

Lmaoooooooo this is top tier 16.5K views · 116 likes · 3 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →
Sean McVay went full galaxy brain ln and they seemed to outsmart themselves. No wonder they ran the worst QB sneak you'll ever see. 47.3K views · 426 likes · 7 reposts · 27 replies Open on X →
Davante Adams in Week 1, per @SumerSports: 31 total snaps 21 routes run He appeared in just 1-of-6 snaps inside the 10-yard line. https://t.co/rQ5CdDCcx6
228.6K views · 568 likes · 23 reposts · 34 replies Open on X →
The Rams are gonna need to figure it out reeeeeeeeal fast. This is a gauntlet. https://t.co/ky7DVTVYZD
56.8K views · 480 likes · 16 reposts · 38 replies Open on X →
@QBsMVP @ScottKacsmar @SumerSports McDuffie has always been much more of an elite C3 boundary corner than a man corner. Don’t mistake press with press man 13.1K views · 200 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@QBsMVP @SumerSports It appeared they had more faith in their pass rush than what was provided and started pulling blitzes. Once they failed to get pressure and were losing the trench battle it looked like they began to turn towards zone and were only sending 4 18.9K views · 165 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
Trent McDuffie and Jaylen Watson gave up a combined 2 receptions for 15 yards and 1 TD on 5 targets, per @SumerSports. 49.5K views · 646 likes · 26 reposts · 14 replies Open on X →
@QBsMVP @SumerSports THIS IS WHAT IM SAYING!! Shula is running the same fucking defense from last year with more capable players. 28.1K views · 553 likes · 4 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
The Rams rebuilt their CB room by adding man-coverage specialists and played zone 77.8% of the snaps in Week 1, per @SumerSports. Just 13.9% in man coverage. Odd. 1.1M views · 9.6K likes · 441 reposts · 115 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

9 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. wird weit gezeigt, aber nur wenige dieser Zuschauer reagieren.

Medianaufrufe47 297dieses Konto924Median für 10K–100K
Reichweite, %182.19%dieses Konto3.62%Median für 10K–100K
Interaktion, %0.95%dieses Konto1.52%Median für 10K–100K
KennzahlDieses KontoMedian für 10K–100KVerhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag47 29792451.2×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)182.19%3.62%50.3×
Interaktionsrate0.95%1.52%0.63×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe →   Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen →   Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.1M11 Sep
28.1K
49.5K
18.9K
13.1K
56.8K
228.6K
47.3K
16.5K

Last 9 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.95%11 Sep
2.00%
1.39%
0.89%
1.53%
0.94%
0.27%
0.97%
0.76%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes91.7%12 781 in total
Reposts3.7%520 in total
Replies1.7%243 in total
Bookmarks2.9%400 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Ähnliche Konten