tweetindex
IT

Sosa Kremenjas ✓

@QBsMVP · 🇨🇦 · joined 06 Jun 2009

News @underdog Ball So Hard U alumni 🇭🇷🇩🇪

25 960Followers
1 324Following
97 353Posts total
1.5MViews on collected posts

Ultimi post

Lmaoooooooo this is top tier 16.5K views · 116 likes · 3 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →
Sean McVay went full galaxy brain ln and they seemed to outsmart themselves. No wonder they ran the worst QB sneak you'll ever see. 47.3K views · 426 likes · 7 reposts · 27 replies Open on X →
Davante Adams in Week 1, per @SumerSports: 31 total snaps 21 routes run He appeared in just 1-of-6 snaps inside the 10-yard line. https://t.co/rQ5CdDCcx6
228.6K views · 568 likes · 23 reposts · 34 replies Open on X →
The Rams are gonna need to figure it out reeeeeeeeal fast. This is a gauntlet. https://t.co/ky7DVTVYZD
56.8K views · 480 likes · 16 reposts · 38 replies Open on X →
@QBsMVP @ScottKacsmar @SumerSports McDuffie has always been much more of an elite C3 boundary corner than a man corner. Don’t mistake press with press man 13.1K views · 200 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@QBsMVP @SumerSports It appeared they had more faith in their pass rush than what was provided and started pulling blitzes. Once they failed to get pressure and were losing the trench battle it looked like they began to turn towards zone and were only sending 4 18.9K views · 165 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
Trent McDuffie and Jaylen Watson gave up a combined 2 receptions for 15 yards and 1 TD on 5 targets, per @SumerSports. 49.5K views · 646 likes · 26 reposts · 14 replies Open on X →
@QBsMVP @SumerSports THIS IS WHAT IM SAYING!! Shula is running the same fucking defense from last year with more capable players. 28.1K views · 553 likes · 4 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
The Rams rebuilt their CB room by adding man-coverage specialists and played zone 77.8% of the snaps in Week 1, per @SumerSports. Just 13.9% in man coverage. Odd. 1.1M views · 9.6K likes · 441 reposts · 115 replies Open on X →

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

9 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di 10K–100K follower. arriva a molti, ma pochi di loro reagiscono.

Visualizzazioni mediane47 297questo account924mediana per 10K–100K
Copertura, %182.19%questo account3.62%mediana per 10K–100K
Interazione, %0.95%questo account1.52%mediana per 10K–100K
MetricaQuesto accountMediana per 10K–100KRapporto
Visualizzazioni mediane per post47 29792451.2×
Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower)182.19%3.62%50.3×
Tasso di interazione0.95%1.52%0.63×

Altri account di questa fascia →   Confronta con un altro account →   Come sono costruiti questi parametri →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.1M11 Sep
28.1K
49.5K
18.9K
13.1K
56.8K
228.6K
47.3K
16.5K

Last 9 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.95%11 Sep
2.00%
1.39%
0.89%
1.53%
0.94%
0.27%
0.97%
0.76%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes91.7%12 781 in total
Reposts3.7%520 in total
Replies1.7%243 in total
Bookmarks2.9%400 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Account simili