tweetindex
DE

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

@TrendsCognSci · Cambridge, MA · joined 01 Feb 2011

Trends in Cognitive Sciences - monthly review journal featuring developments across cog sci and neurosci. Posts by the editor.

31 410Followers
511Following
3 016Posts total
29.2KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

The nativist–empiricist debate is broken Opinion by Jake Quilty-Dunn (@quiltydunn) & Justin Wood Free access before Oct 31: https://t.co/oa6m41VfPt https://t.co/ibquWvnn0D
3.7K views · 66 likes · 18 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@TrendsCognSci @sami_r_yousif Yousif and Epstein (2026) correctly identify that abstract thought is structurally indistinguishable from spatial navigation within hippocampal-entorhinal circuits. 51 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Neurocomputational mechanisms underlying cognitive flexibility: a translational perspective Review by Florian Bähner, Sarah Oh, Ali Hummos, Kai Sandbrink, Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg, & Anne Collins Free access before Oct 21: https://t.co/ij5kcmux5F https://t.co/3Vfy8gprtt
6K views · 116 likes · 23 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@TrendsCognSci @sami_r_yousif @sean_a_mcclure is this the nerdification of memory palace? 218 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Cognitive maps as a medium for thought Opinion by Sami Yousif (@sami_r_yousif) & Russell Epstein Free access before Oct 15: https://t.co/Uue8Tftu1X https://t.co/9oUklxZGUS
6.8K views · 169 likes · 31 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Beyond arousal: pupil fluctuations, neural activity, and behavior Review by Veera Ruuskanen & Sebastiaan Mathôt Free access before Oct 7: https://t.co/zPTTw3cVJF https://t.co/OywjORWA5B
5.8K views · 94 likes · 29 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@TrendsCognSci @cp https://t.co/CjuDFyo42e
54 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
We are on now on Bluesky! Follow us at @cp-trendscognsci.bsky.social https://t.co/e0ouR3pvyC
6.6K views · 12 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

6 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. wird weit über das eigene Publikum hinaus gezeigt, und es reagiert.

Medianaufrufe4 716dieses Konto922Median für 10K–100K
Reichweite, %15.02%dieses Konto3.42%Median für 10K–100K
Interaktion, %2.33%dieses Konto1.53%Median für 10K–100K
KennzahlDieses KontoMedian für 10K–100KVerhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag4 7169225.12×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)15.02%3.42%4.39×
Interaktionsrate2.33%1.53%1.52×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe →   Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen →   Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

6.6K24 Mar
5430 Mar
5.8K31 Aug
6.8K10 Sep
21811 Sep
6K
5112 Sep
3.7K15 Sep

Last 8 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.23%24 Mar
0.00%30 Mar
2.15%31 Aug
2.96%10 Sep
0.46%11 Sep
2.33%
3.92%12 Sep
2.33%15 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.53%.

What the audience does

Likes50.6%458 in total
Reposts11.3%102 in total
Replies0.9%8 in total
Quotes0.1%1 in total
Bookmarks37.2%337 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Ähnliche Konten