tweetindex
IT

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

@TrendsCognSci · Cambridge, MA · joined 01 Feb 2011

Trends in Cognitive Sciences - monthly review journal featuring developments across cog sci and neurosci. Posts by the editor.

31 410Followers
511Following
3 016Posts total
29.2KViews on collected posts

Ultimi post

The nativist–empiricist debate is broken Opinion by Jake Quilty-Dunn (@quiltydunn) & Justin Wood Free access before Oct 31: https://t.co/oa6m41VfPt https://t.co/ibquWvnn0D
3.7K views · 66 likes · 18 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@TrendsCognSci @sami_r_yousif Yousif and Epstein (2026) correctly identify that abstract thought is structurally indistinguishable from spatial navigation within hippocampal-entorhinal circuits. 51 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Neurocomputational mechanisms underlying cognitive flexibility: a translational perspective Review by Florian Bähner, Sarah Oh, Ali Hummos, Kai Sandbrink, Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg, & Anne Collins Free access before Oct 21: https://t.co/ij5kcmux5F https://t.co/3Vfy8gprtt
6K views · 116 likes · 23 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@TrendsCognSci @sami_r_yousif @sean_a_mcclure is this the nerdification of memory palace? 218 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Cognitive maps as a medium for thought Opinion by Sami Yousif (@sami_r_yousif) & Russell Epstein Free access before Oct 15: https://t.co/Uue8Tftu1X https://t.co/9oUklxZGUS
6.8K views · 169 likes · 31 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Beyond arousal: pupil fluctuations, neural activity, and behavior Review by Veera Ruuskanen & Sebastiaan Mathôt Free access before Oct 7: https://t.co/zPTTw3cVJF https://t.co/OywjORWA5B
5.8K views · 94 likes · 29 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@TrendsCognSci @cp https://t.co/CjuDFyo42e
54 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
We are on now on Bluesky! Follow us at @cp-trendscognsci.bsky.social https://t.co/e0ouR3pvyC
6.6K views · 12 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

6 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di 10K–100K follower. arriva ben oltre il proprio pubblico, e quel pubblico reagisce.

Visualizzazioni mediane4 716questo account922mediana per 10K–100K
Copertura, %15.02%questo account3.42%mediana per 10K–100K
Interazione, %2.33%questo account1.53%mediana per 10K–100K
MetricaQuesto accountMediana per 10K–100KRapporto
Visualizzazioni mediane per post4 7169225.12×
Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower)15.02%3.42%4.39×
Tasso di interazione2.33%1.53%1.52×

Altri account di questa fascia →   Confronta con un altro account →   Come sono costruiti questi parametri →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

6.6K24 Mar
5430 Mar
5.8K31 Aug
6.8K10 Sep
21811 Sep
6K
5112 Sep
3.7K15 Sep

Last 8 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.23%24 Mar
0.00%30 Mar
2.15%31 Aug
2.96%10 Sep
0.46%11 Sep
2.33%
3.92%12 Sep
2.33%15 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.53%.

What the audience does

Likes50.6%458 in total
Reposts11.3%102 in total
Replies0.9%8 in total
Quotes0.1%1 in total
Bookmarks37.2%337 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Account simili