January “Janus” Walker ✓

@UtahPolitician · Salt Lake City, UT · joined 15 Mar 2009

Infoton P30 fixes Data Centers so they use no water or nuclear. Neuroscientist of Information Physics, Planetary Information Security Officer, World Peace 🌎🕊️

14 383Followers

121Following

22 741Posts total

8.2KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

January “Janus” Walker ✓@UtahPolitician4 Sep

Ban #trafficking in all forms. #Al cannot generate anything it does not already have. AI are Statistical Inference Models. The laws are wrong and the judges do not understand information physics. Any elected position or leader who does not understand m(T) = kBTIn(2)/c2 is not htt 101 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

January “Janus” Walker ✓@UtahPolitician25 Aug

Why did the men of the Manhattan Project aka @ENERGY decide to turn existence off? Why did they decide to give earth a planetary cancer? #nuclear 451 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

January “Janus” Walker ✓@UtahPolitician25 Aug

I don’t think people understand what Infoton is doing. Building an embryo from particles, to chemistry, amino acids, proteins, mitochondria, cells, dna/rna, genes, through to embryonic progression is extraordinary even if only 33% correct. No machine learning or big data used. ht 430 views · 5 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

January “Janus” Walker ✓@UtahPolitician25 Aug

@UtahPolitician U know the US has a major sex addiction prob yes? We’re the #1 consumer of ch ild p0 rn, yes? It’s all part of the corruption. It’s not personal but it is gross. Not all men of course, but many have sexual perversions. Why else is p0 rn so easy to view online? It 73 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

January “Janus” Walker ✓@UtahPolitician25 Aug

@UtahPolitician communication is hard there is what is in our head there is how we translate that to words there is what those words translate to in their heads errors are common at each phase only we know what's in our heads and we reveal it in both what we say and how we tra 62 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

January “Janus” Walker ✓@UtahPolitician25 Aug

Have recently become aware when I talk to people they hear what I share through the lens of their sexuality. 😐 I find the perverse distortions of which people translated my words—especially grief— in their head to sexual tones which were never present in myself around the topic 681 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

January “Janus” Walker ✓@UtahPolitician23 Jun

@UtahPolitician Eternal wisdom. https://t.co/IkkgnTKpPK 132 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

January “Janus” Walker ✓@UtahPolitician23 Jun

@UtahPolitician https://t.co/XUDkvH3rRz 119 views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

January “Janus” Walker ✓@UtahPolitician23 Jun

@UtahPolitician Posting slop, getting no engagement and just spreading misinformation Just delete your accounts 111 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

January “Janus” Walker ✓@UtahPolitician18 Jun

The data center scaling, power demand, and water usage is not a mystery. We’ve known about Landauer since 1961. In this space I will explain the issue in detail answer questions and discuss the Infoton P30 update. https://t.co/ONGFCQrD26 https://t.co/0vTicDFldV https://t.co/ipw 6K views · 30 likes · 9 reposts · 16 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

6 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. erreicht weniger Menschen als Konten gleicher Größe.

Medianaufrufe266dieses Konto924Median für 10K–100K

Reichweite, %1.85%dieses Konto3.62%Median für 10K–100K

Interaktion, %1.20%dieses Konto1.52%Median für 10K–100K

Kennzahl	Dieses Konto	Median für 10K–100K	Verhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag	266	924	0.29×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)	1.85%	3.62%	0.51×
Interaktionsrate	1.20%	1.52%	0.79×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe → Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen → Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

6K18 Jun

11123 Jun

119

132

68125 Aug

430

451

1014 Sep

Last 10 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.96%18 Jun

4.50%23 Jun

5.04%

4.55%

1.03%25 Aug

1.61%

1.37%

1.40%

0.89%

0.99%4 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes54.0%61 in total

Reposts8.8%10 in total

Replies18.6%21 in total

Quotes2.7%3 in total

Bookmarks15.9%18 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Neueste Beiträge

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Ähnliche Konten