January “Janus” Walker ✓

@UtahPolitician · Salt Lake City, UT · joined 15 Mar 2009

Infoton P30 fixes Data Centers so they use no water or nuclear. Neuroscientist of Information Physics, Planetary Information Security Officer, World Peace 🌎🕊️

14 383Followers

121Following

22 741Posts total

8.2KViews on collected posts

Son gönderiler

January “Janus” Walker ✓@UtahPolitician4 Sep

Ban #trafficking in all forms. #Al cannot generate anything it does not already have. AI are Statistical Inference Models. The laws are wrong and the judges do not understand information physics. Any elected position or leader who does not understand m(T) = kBTIn(2)/c2 is not htt 101 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

January “Janus” Walker ✓@UtahPolitician25 Aug

Why did the men of the Manhattan Project aka @ENERGY decide to turn existence off? Why did they decide to give earth a planetary cancer? #nuclear 451 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

January “Janus” Walker ✓@UtahPolitician25 Aug

I don’t think people understand what Infoton is doing. Building an embryo from particles, to chemistry, amino acids, proteins, mitochondria, cells, dna/rna, genes, through to embryonic progression is extraordinary even if only 33% correct. No machine learning or big data used. ht 430 views · 5 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

January “Janus” Walker ✓@UtahPolitician25 Aug

@UtahPolitician U know the US has a major sex addiction prob yes? We’re the #1 consumer of ch ild p0 rn, yes? It’s all part of the corruption. It’s not personal but it is gross. Not all men of course, but many have sexual perversions. Why else is p0 rn so easy to view online? It 73 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

January “Janus” Walker ✓@UtahPolitician25 Aug

@UtahPolitician communication is hard there is what is in our head there is how we translate that to words there is what those words translate to in their heads errors are common at each phase only we know what's in our heads and we reveal it in both what we say and how we tra 62 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

January “Janus” Walker ✓@UtahPolitician25 Aug

Have recently become aware when I talk to people they hear what I share through the lens of their sexuality. 😐 I find the perverse distortions of which people translated my words—especially grief— in their head to sexual tones which were never present in myself around the topic 681 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

January “Janus” Walker ✓@UtahPolitician23 Jun

@UtahPolitician Eternal wisdom. https://t.co/IkkgnTKpPK 132 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

January “Janus” Walker ✓@UtahPolitician23 Jun

@UtahPolitician https://t.co/XUDkvH3rRz 119 views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

January “Janus” Walker ✓@UtahPolitician23 Jun

@UtahPolitician Posting slop, getting no engagement and just spreading misinformation Just delete your accounts 111 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

January “Janus” Walker ✓@UtahPolitician18 Jun

The data center scaling, power demand, and water usage is not a mystery. We’ve known about Landauer since 1961. In this space I will explain the issue in detail answer questions and discuss the Infoton P30 update. https://t.co/ONGFCQrD26 https://t.co/0vTicDFldV https://t.co/ipw 6K views · 30 likes · 9 reposts · 16 replies Open on X →

Aynı büyüklükteki hesaplara karşı

Son 90 güne ait 6 gönderi, 10K–100K takipçi aralığıyla yan yana. aynı büyüklükteki hesaplardan daha az kişiye ulaşıyor.

Medyan görüntülenme266bu hesap92410K–100K için medyan

Erişim, %1.85%bu hesap3.62%10K–100K için medyan

Etkileşim, %1.20%bu hesap1.52%10K–100K için medyan

Ölçüt	Bu hesap	10K–100K için medyan	Oran
Gönderi başına medyan görüntülenme	266	924	0.29×
Erişim (görüntülenme ÷ takipçi)	1.85%	3.62%	0.51×
Etkileşim oranı	1.20%	1.52%	0.79×

Bu aralıktaki diğer hesaplar → Başka bir hesapla karşılaştır → Bu kıyas değerleri nasıl kuruluyor →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

6K18 Jun

11123 Jun

119

132

68125 Aug

430

451

1014 Sep

Last 10 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.96%18 Jun

4.50%23 Jun

5.04%

4.55%

1.03%25 Aug

1.61%

1.37%

1.40%

0.89%

0.99%4 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes54.0%61 in total

Reposts8.8%10 in total

Replies18.6%21 in total

Quotes2.7%3 in total

Bookmarks15.9%18 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Son gönderiler

Aynı büyüklükteki hesaplara karşı

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Benzer hesaplar