Chicago Booth Review

@chicagoboothrev · joined 26 Aug 2013

Research-driven insights on business, policy, and markets. A @ChicagoBooth publication. Podcast: https://t.co/Uutg3VKcmV Greatest hits: https://t.co/6suxerIykZ

62 343Followers

1 054Following

27 505Posts total

5.8KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

Chicago Booth Review@chicagoboothrev18 Sep

🎙️ NEW podcast Why are sales skills life skills? Chicago Booth’s @michaelalter wants us to think about sales as less about convincing people and more about listening to them. https://t.co/6JB3qDV4Lu 290 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Chicago Booth Review@chicagoboothrev17 Sep

MIT’s @DAcemogluMIT joins #Capitalisnt hosts @bethanymac12 and @zingales to discuss why the system that delivered unprecedented freedom and prosperity abandoned the working class in favor of the college-education elite. @StiglerCenter https://t.co/REEXlVXQgp 907 views · 2 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Chicago Booth Review@chicagoboothrev17 Sep

Can jargon boost performance? In a study, teams that relied more heavily on jargon, or shorthand words and phrases, converged more quickly on a shared language for a task. https://t.co/NVM4V86I66 https://t.co/rctDnv6j5Q

607 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Chicago Booth Review@chicagoboothrev17 Sep

How was school today? What did you have for lunch? @UChicago @HarrisPolicy's @ariel_kalil argues many of us have been thinking wrong about how to encourage parents to talk and read with their children. Do parents just need better conversation starters? https://t.co/BD3Ztok92c 436 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Chicago Booth Review@chicagoboothrev18 Aug

Why don't most voters spend hours researching every candidate and policy? According to @ChicagoBooth's Sam Peltzman, the answer is something economists call "rational ignorance." Listen to the full CBR Podcast 🎧https://t.co/obOlCf0YAt Watch on YouTube https://t.co/D0BHd1yOLv

1:41

3.5K views · 12 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

5 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. liegt bei Reichweite und Interaktion unter vergleichbaren Konten.

Medianaufrufe607dieses Konto953Median für 10K–100K

Reichweite, %0.97%dieses Konto3.62%Median für 10K–100K

Interaktion, %0.44%dieses Konto1.51%Median für 10K–100K

Kennzahl	Dieses Konto	Median für 10K–100K	Verhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag	607	953	0.64×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)	0.97%	3.62%	0.27×
Interaktionsrate	0.44%	1.51%	0.29×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe → Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen → Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

3.5K18 Aug

43617 Sep

607

907

29018 Sep

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.40%18 Aug

0.23%17 Sep

0.66%

0.44%

0.69%18 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.51%.

What the audience does

Likes58.8%20 in total

Reposts8.8%3 in total

Replies2.9%1 in total

Quotes2.9%1 in total

Bookmarks26.5%9 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Neueste Beiträge

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Ähnliche Konten