Chicago Booth Review

@chicagoboothrev · joined 26 Aug 2013

Research-driven insights on business, policy, and markets. A @ChicagoBooth publication. Podcast: https://t.co/Uutg3VKcmV Greatest hits: https://t.co/6suxerIykZ

62 343Followers

1 054Following

27 505Posts total

5.8KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

Chicago Booth Review@chicagoboothrev18 Sep

🎙️ NEW podcast Why are sales skills life skills? Chicago Booth’s @michaelalter wants us to think about sales as less about convincing people and more about listening to them. https://t.co/6JB3qDV4Lu 290 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Chicago Booth Review@chicagoboothrev17 Sep

MIT’s @DAcemogluMIT joins #Capitalisnt hosts @bethanymac12 and @zingales to discuss why the system that delivered unprecedented freedom and prosperity abandoned the working class in favor of the college-education elite. @StiglerCenter https://t.co/REEXlVXQgp 907 views · 2 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Chicago Booth Review@chicagoboothrev17 Sep

Can jargon boost performance? In a study, teams that relied more heavily on jargon, or shorthand words and phrases, converged more quickly on a shared language for a task. https://t.co/NVM4V86I66 https://t.co/rctDnv6j5Q

607 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Chicago Booth Review@chicagoboothrev17 Sep

How was school today? What did you have for lunch? @UChicago @HarrisPolicy's @ariel_kalil argues many of us have been thinking wrong about how to encourage parents to talk and read with their children. Do parents just need better conversation starters? https://t.co/BD3Ztok92c 436 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Chicago Booth Review@chicagoboothrev18 Aug

Why don't most voters spend hours researching every candidate and policy? According to @ChicagoBooth's Sam Peltzman, the answer is something economists call "rational ignorance." Listen to the full CBR Podcast 🎧https://t.co/obOlCf0YAt Watch on YouTube https://t.co/D0BHd1yOLv

1:41

3.5K views · 12 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

5 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม ต่ำกว่าบัญชีรุ่นเดียวกันทั้งการเข้าถึงและการมีส่วนร่วม.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน607บัญชีนี้953ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การเข้าถึง, %0.97%บัญชีนี้3.62%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การมีส่วนร่วม, %0.44%บัญชีนี้1.51%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

ตัวชี้วัด	บัญชีนี้	ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K	อัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์	607	953	0.64×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)	0.97%	3.62%	0.27×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม	0.44%	1.51%	0.29×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ → เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น → ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

3.5K18 Aug

43617 Sep

607

907

29018 Sep

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.40%18 Aug

0.23%17 Sep

0.66%

0.44%

0.69%18 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.51%.

What the audience does

Likes58.8%20 in total

Reposts8.8%3 in total

Replies2.9%1 in total

Quotes2.9%1 in total

Bookmarks26.5%9 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

โพสต์ล่าสุด

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน