tweetindex
DE

Ethan Mollick ✓

@emollick · Philadelphia, PA · joined 10 May 2009

Professor @Wharton studying AI. New book, Co-Existence, coming October 20. Preorder here: https://t.co/hsDYf1xU9K Substack: https://t.co/UIBhxu4bgq

388 273Followers
593Following
36 905Posts total
3.8MViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

@emollick I actually love this approach. "We have solved all of the Millennium Challenges but we will not release the answers to respect the institutions and traditional process.". That is such a bad look for those institutions! 5K views · 123 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@emollick If only the academic community had come up with a set of shared norms and practices for sharing research results that could be followed... 7.9K views · 205 likes · 10 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@emollick Stuff like this is what makes me worry that the "underclass" is actually going to be the ones creating the "permanent underclass" 7.2K views · 172 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
I don’t usually spread rumors but: 1) This is from someone with inside knowledge & is plausible 2) Is a real issue of policy we need to think about: if the norms of sharing become strained, will the labs start hoarding knowledge to avoid PR issues? Here https://t.co/RAZzJH4EWu h
317.3K views · 2.1K likes · 137 reposts · 145 replies Open on X →
Got GPT-5.6 Astra building something neat, should be done shortly. If you know, you know (and if not, I'll be posting the whole thing soon anyway). https://t.co/EJMWF9Wt6w 10.2K views · 67 likes · 2 reposts · 12 replies Open on X →
It is funny that the Fermat's Last Theorem proof description, short as it is, still smells so much of Claude ("names each step and the Lean Theorem that carries it"). 12.5K views · 45 likes · 4 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →
So far, there isn't evidence that production models with guardrails collude in this way, but both smarter closed models (which may be less compliant) & Mythos-class open models (that can be ablated) are coming. Cybersecurity is going to become a mess soon https://t.co/bdp0nD4u5z 16.1K views · 171 likes · 14 reposts · 27 replies Open on X →
One thing that makes Astra (and Fable) so interesting and, in some ways, so hard to grapple with is that they just take action. I asked for an ill-defined deliverable in Blender and Astra spins up a historical research agent and a visual critic etc. & just starts doing stuff. ht 25.2K views · 254 likes · 10 reposts · 36 replies Open on X →
@emollick Check out https://t.co/ZC7EtqbMVC v1. You can share any terminal with a live link, cross model, harness etc. e2ee and p2p. v2 will rock ;) 309 views · 9 likes · 4 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
If you haven’t tried it, there is a fully narrated tour, historical links, you can read scrolls, you can flash forward to various scenes and theories about the libraries decay and its multiple fires, etc. Open source here: https://t.co/39tMSzkLU1 10.2K views · 37 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@emollick The reason it stays primitive is there’s no proper shared layer underneath. every person’s AI starts from its own context, so “multiplayer” just means multiple single-player sessions happening in the same building. The fix is a shared knowledge (not memory) layer the wh 2.2K views · 13 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@emollick Here are a few key ideas about what would have to look at from @sergeykarayev https://t.co/U5sq8yKJq8 https://t.co/MGdFH0dF2J 749 views · 11 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@emollick It worked autonmously on this project…. For days?? 4.2K views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
I had early access, and a longer post is coming, but GPT-6 is stunning & is good enough that it actually does complex meaningful work for me autonomously for days. As a more fun example, it made a historically-based simulation of the Library of Alexandria: https://t.co/o67r2SE4A
0:48
101K views · 1.4K likes · 101 reposts · 53 replies Open on X →
Fable 5.1: "Create the Catalog of Ships from the Iliad with a map, etc. i should be able to explore each accurate ship in 3D. there should be real images & archeological data i can draw on. test it with agents to make it accurate & beautiful, then revise" https://t.co/SpFapJlMo9 34.1K views · 311 likes · 26 reposts · 30 replies Open on X →
Codex voice (or is it ChatGPT Work in Codex voice?) is magical when it works well, but has a lot of weird loose edges that make it hard to use, like it seems to constantly switch threads it is working on, multitasks only sometimes, accesses the rest of Codex inconsistently, etc. 14.4K views · 95 likes · 3 reposts · 14 replies Open on X →
Prinz has been running legal benchmarks against AI systems and the latest models are very good... but cheaper/low reasoning models are not very good. So, how do you make sure your vendor selling an AI solution is incentivized to serve the good (and therefore expensive) models? 24.4K views · 155 likes · 6 reposts · 20 replies Open on X →
10 months between these two visions of how ChatGPT agents work. https://t.co/vgTnIDBN7K 42.5K views · 335 likes · 10 reposts · 20 replies Open on X →
UBI, in itself, is not a political philosophy. 8.6K views · 36 likes · 1 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
I definitely think that it is still really early, but ideas and writing also diffused a lot more slowly in the the 19th century...https://t.co/0rdR3MpYso 21.1K views · 77 likes · 1 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
@emollick First major socialist texts were in the 1840s, I think? That's decades into the Industrial Revolution! Seems too early for AI 23.7K views · 35 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Kind of surprised that we are not seeing more radical political ideas built around AI capabilities, the way that early mass industrialization was a prime motivator in the conceptions of capitalism, communism, and socialism. 75.9K views · 814 likes · 68 reposts · 197 replies Open on X →
@emollick eli5 is maybe too clickbaity of a name, the prompt doesn’t actually ask you to explain it like I’m 5, just like you don’t have domain knowledge I think the “big pictures, few words” part of that prompt is actually the most important part 9.5K views · 70 likes · 1 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
Research shows that drawing connections to what you already know helps you remember and build context. And you aren’t five! You don’t need things dumbed down, you need things explained differently. The fact that LLMs can actually do this is one of their most exciting features 7.6K views · 95 likes · 2 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
I don’t like ELI5 as default for “make this easy to understand,” a great thing about LLMs is the ability to work as universal translators across topics Asking for generic dumbed-down explanations is worse than asking for personalized ones: “explain to me drawing on what I know” 77.8K views · 464 likes · 18 reposts · 45 replies Open on X →
a skill people at Anthropic have been using a lot recently: ELI5 /eli5 <what you want explained> "explain like I'm someone who knows nothing about this topic, using a HTML artifact with big pictures and few words" https://t.co/OZqzjAyFdT 2.3M views · 13.7K likes · 1.2K reposts · 379 replies Open on X →
@emollick Trolling with the sixth finger 😂 367 views · 7 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@emollick @IrenaCronin excited for this, loved your first book! Co-Intelligence: Living and Working With AI book summary in 4k https://t.co/k4PyNE8jPJ 3.2K views · 38 likes · 5 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@emollick Pre-ordered! Looking forward to reading (listening) to it :). 1.5K views · 9 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
🚨I have a new book coming out October 20: Co-Existence! It is about how we live & work with AIs that are sometimes (but not always) smarter than we are. And it has a cool cover. You can pre-order: https://t.co/Ti5jo6ksfI And here is a post with context: https://t.co/YpWvCG4dUD 208.8K views · 1K likes · 99 reposts · 117 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

26 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 100K–1M Follower. wird mehr Menschen gezeigt als Konten gleicher Größe.

Medianaufrufe13 434dieses Konto5 983Median für 100K–1M
Reichweite, %3.46%dieses Konto1.49%Median für 100K–1M
Interaktion, %0.80%dieses Konto0.93%Median für 100K–1M
KennzahlDieses KontoMedian für 100K–1MVerhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag13 4345 9832.25×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)3.46%1.49%2.32×
Interaktionsrate0.80%0.93%0.86×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe →   Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen →   Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

101K3 Sep
4.2K
749
2.2K
10.2K
309
25.2K4 Sep
16.1K
12.5K
10.2K
317.3K15 Sep
7.2K
7.9K16 Sep
5K

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.57%3 Sep
0.19%
1.74%
0.64%
0.37%
4.21%
1.20%4 Sep
1.32%
0.47%
0.80%
0.78%15 Sep
2.43%
2.75%16 Sep
2.46%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes79.5%21 885 in total
Reposts6.1%1 683 in total
Replies4.1%1 135 in total
Quotes2.0%544 in total
Bookmarks8.3%2 271 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Ähnliche Konten