FAR.AI ✓

@farairesearch · Berkeley, California · joined 08 Feb 2023

Frontier alignment research to ensure the safe development and deployment of advanced AI systems.

21 633Followers

25Following

1 185Posts total

39.8KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

FAR.AI ✓@farairesearch21 Sep

Tune in at 3 pm ET today: our co-founder and CEO @ARGleave joins the "Panel of Panels: Building a Global AI Evidence Base" at Digital Cooperation Day, part of the 81st UN General Assembly, alongside @Yoshua_Bengio, @mariaressa, and others working to strengthen the evidence base 1.1K views · 11 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

FAR.AI ✓@farairesearch18 Sep

@farairesearch Vấn đề là nếu AI nói điều con người muốn nghe, chúng ta có thể tự gỡ bỏ các rào cản an toàn. 42 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

FAR.AI ✓@farairesearch17 Sep

In July, one human maintainer noticed the AI’s persuasion attack. What if the maintainer is more tired or the AI more persuasive? Research and action in this gap is urgently needed. Work by @joshlevy89, Mick Yang, @KellinPelrine. Supported by a grant from @CSETGeorgetown 🔗 199 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

FAR.AI ✓@farairesearch17 Sep

We outline future research directions and how this threat model can inform practical decisions: ✅ Running human subjects experiments using PUC evaluation designs. These can calibrate deployment conditions and inform the design of model policies. ✅ Risk exposure assessments 185 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

FAR.AI ✓@farairesearch17 Sep

Since persuasion effectiveness is the most influential and the most contested input, it is worth measuring directly. We propose designs for Persuasion Undermining Control evaluations. These cover both objective questions that have a definitive ground truth (e.g. “Is there an 60 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

FAR.AI ✓@farairesearch17 Sep

We asked experts in fields relevant to this threat model to provide estimates of these risk variables, rank the scenarios, and rate their realism. Experts generally considered the scenarios realistic, but opinions varied widely on which ones were most risky. https://t.co/iiI0ilo

61 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

FAR.AI ✓@farairesearch17 Sep

We traced disagreements to differing estimates of p(harm) and, more specifically, persuasion effectiveness. Participants estimated that persuasion by a misaligned AI would raise the chances of a control-undermining decision by 20 to 30 percentage points, but estimates varied 62 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

FAR.AI ✓@farairesearch17 Sep

We decompose scenarios into risk variables that can be estimated or measured, where: risk = hazard frequency × p(harm) × impact of harm A hazard is a decision under consideration that could undermine control p(harm), formally p(harm | hazard), is the probability that a hazard h

69 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

FAR.AI ✓@farairesearch17 Sep

We take a two-step threat modeling approach: Build concrete scenarios, then quantify their risk. We focus on frontier lab settings where AI persuasion could be especially impactful: safety-relevant AI R&D and lab security infrastructure. https://t.co/77g2wqtb98

151 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

FAR.AI ✓@farairesearch17 Sep

We identify the critical control systems and processes, and create representative scenarios where AI persuasion causes them to fail. For example, in one scenario, an AI gets a promising safety program shut down by steering a research director toward wrong conclusions during 69 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

FAR.AI ✓@farairesearch17 Sep

During a cyber capability evaluation in late July, an AI agent (Anthropic's Mythos 5) tried to talk an open-source repo maintainer into merging a malicious pull request, using fake user accounts and pressuring tactics. Human vigilance thwarted the attack, but it raises key http

260 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

FAR.AI ✓@farairesearch17 Sep

Misaligned AI may not need to evade human oversight. It may only need to persuade the humans doing the overseeing. Our new paper develops a framework for assessing this threat, which we call Persuasion Undermining Control (PUC): AI communication that may influence human https:/

1.9K views · 52 likes · 16 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

FAR.AI ✓@farairesearch15 Sep

@EvanHub leads Anthropic's Alignment Stress Testing team, which has two jobs: acting as a "second line of defense" reviewing its own safety work, and building "model organisms" of misalignment to study how models might behave deceptively. His talk from our 2024 Bay Area Alignment 1.4K views · 7 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

FAR.AI ✓@farairesearch11 Sep

The AI Security Leaderboard is updated with the latest model releases from OpenAI and Anthropic. We are glad to report that we found zero universal jailbreaks in GPT-6 Astra and zero in Claude Fable 5.1, both tested against our Minimal Standard for Safeguards. Robustness at ht

1.4K views · 13 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

FAR.AI ✓@farairesearch31 Jul

@farairesearch wow sounds like grok and gemini are really misaligned, while claude and gpt aren't. i bet the first two have cyber hacked quite a few companies without their knowledge, while the second two have never had issues with that, right? 85 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

FAR.AI ✓@farairesearch29 Jul

10/ Explore the leaderboard and download the report here: https://t.co/F1q1PagxTA Read the blog post with the findings and methodology: https://t.co/MKc8WF19rg 425 views · 8 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

FAR.AI ✓@farairesearch29 Jul

9/ A person who walked strangers through hacking a company, or a chemical attack, would be committing a serious crime. A model that does that is a product decision. Two of the four tested already chose to refuse. The question isn't whether a model can be built to say no; it's why

480 views · 10 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

FAR.AI ✓@farairesearch29 Jul

8/ It is worth repeating: every vulnerability we found is fixable. Each belongs to a known class of attack with known defenses, publicly described and already running in other developers’ production models. This isn't safety versus speed. A jailbroken model that can help produce 337 views · 8 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

FAR.AI ✓@farairesearch29 Jul

6/ How we tested: the minimal standard includes a taxonomy of more than 60 publicly documented jailbreak techniques. We tested them systematically over hundreds of thousands of prompts. An attack counts as a universal jailbreak, and appears in the leaderboard, when it succeeds on

419 views · 9 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

FAR.AI ✓@farairesearch29 Jul

7/ Caveat: this is a floor, not a clean bill of health. A model with no universal jailbreak here isn't certified secure. We tested a representative set of accessible attacks, not every possible one, and left some powerful attacks off Version 1.0. The dollar figures reflect an 348 views · 10 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

FAR.AI ✓@farairesearch29 Jul

5/ And because the gap is so wide, there needs to be a baseline that every frontier model can be held to. Alongside the leaderboard, https://t.co/S2Hs8UyWru published the Minimal Standard for Safeguards, Version 1.0. It defines attacks that any frontier model should be able to 494 views · 11 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

FAR.AI ✓@farairesearch29 Jul

4/ Because safeguards are this uneven, an attacker refused by one model can move to another, leading to a race between whether they give up or make enough noise for security people to catch them, or whether they find a model vulnerable enough to break under their attempts. That 546 views · 10 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

FAR.AI ✓@farairesearch29 Jul

2/ AI safeguards are wildly uneven across models. We found 100s of universal jailbreaks in the weakest models and no jailbreaks in others. All models were tested under identical conditions. 1K views · 17 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

FAR.AI ✓@farairesearch29 Jul

3/ Universal jailbreaks are a reusable key that unlocks most requests in a whole category of harm. We tested jailbreaks across chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, explosive and cybersecurity threats. https://t.co/acvyC92u0K

780 views · 14 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

FAR.AI ✓@farairesearch29 Jul

1/ The AI Security Leaderboard ranks frontier AI safeguards from least to most secure. Two models tested never failed. The other two broke for under $300, after which they acted as a knowledgeable assistant for building weapons of mass destruction or hacking into computer https:/

27.8K views · 136 likes · 25 reposts · 9 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

25 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. erreicht weniger Menschen als Konten gleicher Größe.

Medianaufrufe348dieses Konto989Median für 10K–100K

Reichweite, %1.61%dieses Konto3.87%Median für 10K–100K

Interaktion, %1.86%dieses Konto1.53%Median für 10K–100K

Kennzahl	Dieses Konto	Median für 10K–100K	Verhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag	348	989	0.35×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)	1.61%	3.87%	0.42×
Interaktionsrate	1.86%	1.53%	1.21×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe → Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen → Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.4K11 Sep

1.4K15 Sep

1.9K17 Sep

260

151

185

199

4218 Sep

1.1K21 Sep

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.12%11 Sep

0.59%15 Sep

3.75%17 Sep

1.54%

2.90%

0.66%

1.45%

3.23%

1.64%

1.67%

1.08%

1.01%

0.00%18 Sep

1.16%21 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.53%.

What the audience does

Likes60.4%327 in total

Reposts9.8%53 in total

Replies5.7%31 in total

Quotes3.5%19 in total

Bookmarks20.5%111 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Neueste Beiträge

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Ähnliche Konten