KULA
@kula_dao · Global · joined 02 Mar 2022
Decentralised Impact Investment
29 931Followers
296Following
7 134Posts total
10.4KViews on collected posts
Neueste Beiträge
Wir suchen neue Beiträge…
Tokenising an illiquid asset means someone has to say what it is worth. And that number can look current while being months out of date.
The feed published this morning. The valuation behind it was struck in spring.
ERC-8330 separates the two. 🧵 https://t.co/EXxnQsRQ6p
699 views · 20 likes
· 6 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
Our Co-Founder @SC4_15 is heading to Impact Summit America next Thursday, 24 September, at the Harvard Club of New York City.
A room full of the asset allocators and institutional investors deciding where impact capital goes next, which is exactly where the conversation about ht
675 views · 18 likes
· 6 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
Financial figures get audited. Impact figures get published.
ERC-8329 closes part of that gap by requiring a methodology commitment with every entry and making corrections visible rather than silent.
Still open for discussion on Ethereum Magicians, and we would particularly
890 views · 16 likes
· 8 reposts · 0 replies
Open on X →
Want to understand what $KULA actually does?
@bit2me Academy has published a full explainer on how Kula brings together impact investment, real-world asset tokenisation and onchain governance, and where the token fits in all of it.
Link below 🧵👇 https://t.co/sIlbKJBmq5
1.4K views · 20 likes
· 5 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
@kula_dao Intrigued by ERC 8329 can it finally bring transparency to impact data?
12 views · 0 likes
· 0 reposts · 0 replies
Open on X →
8/ ERC-8325 identifies the asset. ERC-8326 anchors its documents. ERC-8327 governs how it moves. ERC-8328 records compliance decisions. ERC-8329 records what it actually did.
Each works alone. All extend existing standards rather than replacing them. Released under CC0.
22 views · 1 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
9/ If you're an Ethereum developer, or you work on impact or carbon measurement and have a view on where methodology work should stop and on-chain logging should begin, we would genuinely like to hear it.
https://t.co/56IlIKMVV3
20 views · 0 likes
· 0 reposts · 0 replies
Open on X →
7/ It is also designed to complement existing impact and carbon work rather than replace it.
Where methodology expertise already exists, ERC-8329 is the logging layer beneath it, not a competing standard.
3 views · 1 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
6/ It does not establish that a measurement is true. No standard can.
What it prevents is silent revision, and what it exposes is methodology. Those are the two things you currently cannot check from outside.
2 views · 1 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
4/ The cost lands on projects doing real work. Once an investor has been burned by a figure that did not hold up, they discount everything afterwards, including what was accurate.
Good projects pay for bad record-keeping.
6 views · 1 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
5/ ERC-8329 records impact snapshots as tamper-evident entries, with a mandatory methodology commitment attached to every one.
You cannot log a number without committing to how it was produced. Corrections append rather than overwrite, so the history stays visible.
4 views · 1 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
3/ Impact measurement itself has improved a great deal. What has not is the ability to see whether a published figure was quietly changed afterwards, or what methodology produced it in the first place.
Those two gaps are where trust leaks out.
26 views · 3 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
2/ Financial reporting has audited standards, common formats and a long history of people getting caught.
Impact reporting has none of that. The party being assessed produces the number, chooses the methodology, and publishes on its own timetable.
105 views · 6 likes
· 1 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
An impact claim and a financial figure sit in the same investment memo, but only one of them can be checked.
Impact data arrives as an assertion, months late, in a format nobody can query.
ERC-8329 changes that. 🧵 https://t.co/Sa9EUYIGS5
1.5K views · 17 likes
· 5 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
@kula_dao @bit2me @Bit2Me_Global Good to hear 😊😊
67 views · 2 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
$Kula lists on @bit2me 👇
https://t.co/rbwdemxlwA
150 views · 3 likes
· 0 reposts · 0 replies
Open on X →
$KULA is live on @bit2me.
Trading is open now, and zero fee trading is running for a limited window.
Buy $KULA on Bit2Me: https://t.co/cBXxHfrqCt
Full press release in the replies 👇 https://t.co/LrVj4VyrSr
4.8K views · 52 likes
· 17 reposts · 10 replies
Open on X →
0:24
Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe
17 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. erreicht weniger Menschen als vergleichbare Konten, bindet sie aber deutlich stärker.
Medianaufrufe67dieses Konto988Median für 10K–100K
Reichweite, %0.22%dieses Konto3.86%Median für 10K–100K
Interaktion, %4.01%dieses Konto1.53%Median für 10K–100K
| Kennzahl | Dieses Konto | Median für 10K–100K | Verhältnis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag | 67 | 988 | 0.07× |
| Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower) | 0.22% | 3.86% | 0.06× |
| Interaktionsrate | 4.01% | 1.53% | 2.61× |
Weitere Konten dieser Größe → Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen → Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →
Growth & engagement
How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.
Views per post
1.5K14 Sep
105
26
4
6
2
3
20
22
1215 Sep
1.4K
89017 Sep
67518 Sep
69921 Sep
Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.
Engagement rate per post
1.63%14 Sep
7.62%
15.38%
50.00%
33.33%
100.00%
66.67%
0.00%
9.09%
0.00%15 Sep
2.07%
2.70%17 Sep
3.85%18 Sep
4.01%21 Sep
Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.53%.
What the audience does
Likes65.9%162 in total
Reposts19.5%48 in total
Replies10.6%26 in total
Quotes2.8%7 in total
Bookmarks1.2%3 in total
Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.
The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.
Ähnliche Konten
🇯🇵伝統文化を護る🇯🇵たま🇯🇵
@tamanotamashii
59.9K followers
· 18.6K posts
for BABYMONSTER ✓
@forbabymonster
59.9K followers
· 24.7K posts
Young Kim ✓
@RepYoungKim
59.9K followers
· 9K posts
Allison Bailey ✓
@BluskyeAllison
59.9K followers
· 9.4K posts
ESPN League
@ESPNLeague_br
59.9K followers
· 7.8K posts
メ〜テレ（名古屋テレビ/メーテレ）
@nagoyatv_6ch
59.9K followers
· 22K posts
Aɴᴛ ✓
@AntSpeaks
59.9K followers
· 56.7K posts
ひな@悪徳医師図鑑🗒️ ✓
@dokushingisou
59.9K followers
· 444 posts