tweetindex
FR

KULA

@kula_dao · Global · joined 02 Mar 2022

Decentralised Impact Investment

29 931Followers
296Following
7 134Posts total
10.4KViews on collected posts

Derniers posts

Tokenising an illiquid asset means someone has to say what it is worth. And that number can look current while being months out of date. The feed published this morning. The valuation behind it was struck in spring. ERC-8330 separates the two. 🧵 https://t.co/EXxnQsRQ6p
699 views · 20 likes · 6 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Our Co-Founder @SC4_15 is heading to Impact Summit America next Thursday, 24 September, at the Harvard Club of New York City. A room full of the asset allocators and institutional investors deciding where impact capital goes next, which is exactly where the conversation about ht
675 views · 18 likes · 6 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Financial figures get audited. Impact figures get published. ERC-8329 closes part of that gap by requiring a methodology commitment with every entry and making corrections visible rather than silent. Still open for discussion on Ethereum Magicians, and we would particularly 890 views · 16 likes · 8 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Want to understand what $KULA actually does? @bit2me Academy has published a full explainer on how Kula brings together impact investment, real-world asset tokenisation and onchain governance, and where the token fits in all of it. Link below 🧵👇 https://t.co/sIlbKJBmq5
1.4K views · 20 likes · 5 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@kula_dao Intrigued by ERC 8329 can it finally bring transparency to impact data? 12 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
8/ ERC-8325 identifies the asset. ERC-8326 anchors its documents. ERC-8327 governs how it moves. ERC-8328 records compliance decisions. ERC-8329 records what it actually did. Each works alone. All extend existing standards rather than replacing them. Released under CC0. 22 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
9/ If you're an Ethereum developer, or you work on impact or carbon measurement and have a view on where methodology work should stop and on-chain logging should begin, we would genuinely like to hear it. https://t.co/56IlIKMVV3 20 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
7/ It is also designed to complement existing impact and carbon work rather than replace it. Where methodology expertise already exists, ERC-8329 is the logging layer beneath it, not a competing standard. 3 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
6/ It does not establish that a measurement is true. No standard can. What it prevents is silent revision, and what it exposes is methodology. Those are the two things you currently cannot check from outside. 2 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
4/ The cost lands on projects doing real work. Once an investor has been burned by a figure that did not hold up, they discount everything afterwards, including what was accurate. Good projects pay for bad record-keeping. 6 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
5/ ERC-8329 records impact snapshots as tamper-evident entries, with a mandatory methodology commitment attached to every one. You cannot log a number without committing to how it was produced. Corrections append rather than overwrite, so the history stays visible. 4 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
3/ Impact measurement itself has improved a great deal. What has not is the ability to see whether a published figure was quietly changed afterwards, or what methodology produced it in the first place. Those two gaps are where trust leaks out. 26 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
2/ Financial reporting has audited standards, common formats and a long history of people getting caught. Impact reporting has none of that. The party being assessed produces the number, chooses the methodology, and publishes on its own timetable. 105 views · 6 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
An impact claim and a financial figure sit in the same investment memo, but only one of them can be checked. Impact data arrives as an assertion, months late, in a format nobody can query. ERC-8329 changes that. 🧵 https://t.co/Sa9EUYIGS5
1.5K views · 17 likes · 5 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@kula_dao @bit2me @Bit2Me_Global Good to hear 😊😊 67 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
$Kula lists on @bit2me 👇 https://t.co/rbwdemxlwA 150 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
$KULA is live on @bit2me. Trading is open now, and zero fee trading is running for a limited window. Buy $KULA on Bit2Me: https://t.co/cBXxHfrqCt Full press release in the replies 👇 https://t.co/LrVj4VyrSr
0:24
4.8K views · 52 likes · 17 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →

Face aux comptes de taille comparable

17 posts des 90 derniers jours, à côté de la tranche de 10K–100K abonnés. touche moins de monde que ses pairs, mais les engage bien davantage.

Vues médianes67ce compte948médiane pour 10K–100K
Portée, %0.22%ce compte3.71%médiane pour 10K–100K
Engagement, %4.01%ce compte1.52%médiane pour 10K–100K
IndicateurCe compteMédiane pour 10K–100KRapport
Vues médianes par post679480.07×
Portée (vues ÷ abonnés)0.22%3.71%0.06×
Taux d'engagement4.01%1.52%2.63×

Autres comptes de cette tranche →   Comparer avec un autre compte →   Comment ces repères sont établis →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.5K14 Sep
105
26
4
6
2
3
20
22
1215 Sep
1.4K
89017 Sep
67518 Sep
69921 Sep

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.63%14 Sep
7.62%
15.38%
50.00%
33.33%
100.00%
66.67%
0.00%
9.09%
0.00%15 Sep
2.07%
2.70%17 Sep
3.85%18 Sep
4.01%21 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes65.9%162 in total
Reposts19.5%48 in total
Replies10.6%26 in total
Quotes2.8%7 in total
Bookmarks1.2%3 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Comptes similaires