Nature Methods

@naturemethods · New York · joined 11 Mar 2011

Nature Methods publishes cutting-edge methods, tools, analyses, resources, reviews, news and commentary, supporting life sciences research. Tweets by editors.

155 849Followers

1 086Following

5 806Posts total

27.4KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

Nature Methods@naturemethods3 Sep

@naturemethods "Hey, what's the big deal about spatial-ATAC-Hi-C enabling chromatin accessibility in brain samplesd Looks like some fancy epigenetic analysis to me!". 129 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Nature Methods@naturemethods3 Sep

In our latest Technology Feature, @CarolineSeydel explores how mechanical forces such as tension and compression influence tissue differentiation, and how cell biologists are observing and manipulating such forces in living systems. https://t.co/psfPYQCpMa 4.8K views · 16 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Nature Methods@naturemethods3 Sep

Spatial-ATAC-Hi-C enables profiling chromatin accessibility and spatial organization, as shown in mouse and human brain samples. https://t.co/SUmtBKnTsI 6.4K views · 81 likes · 13 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Nature Methods@naturemethods1 Sep

A Perspective from Deininger, Caldarelli, Zernicka-Goetz, and Mikut examines the role of AI-based image analysis as applied to stem cell-derived models. https://t.co/IKyLXmlxaC https://t.co/TZoHIisGha

5.4K views · 22 likes · 10 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Nature Methods@naturemethods1 Sep

In their Perspective, @labs_mann, Bing Zhang, Tiannan Guo and colleagues discuss key areas in proteomics where AI is poised to drive advances. https://t.co/r4rRzkgmXs 5.1K views · 3 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Nature Methods@naturemethods1 Sep

In our August 'Points of View', Helena Jambor and Alexander Lex discuss how to reuse, remix and vibe code scientific figures. https://t.co/vhMjG2sSou https://t.co/GRINIauGbU

5.5K views · 29 likes · 8 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

6 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 100K–1M Follower. wird weit gezeigt, aber nur wenige dieser Zuschauer reagieren.

Medianaufrufe5 266dieses Konto6 224Median für 100K–1M

Reichweite, %3.38%dieses Konto1.93%Median für 100K–1M

Interaktion, %0.49%dieses Konto1.15%Median für 100K–1M

Kennzahl	Dieses Konto	Median für 100K–1M	Verhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag	5 266	6 224	0.85×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)	3.38%	1.93%	1.75×
Interaktionsrate	0.49%	1.15%	0.43×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe → Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen → Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

5.5K1 Sep

5.1K

5.4K

6.4K3 Sep

4.8K

129

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.69%1 Sep

0.12%

0.61%

1.48%3 Sep

0.37%

0.00%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 1.15%.

What the audience does

Likes55.9%151 in total

Reposts13.0%35 in total

Replies0.7%2 in total

Quotes0.7%2 in total

Bookmarks29.6%80 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Neueste Beiträge

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Ähnliche Konten