Nature Methods

@naturemethods · New York · joined 11 Mar 2011

Nature Methods publishes cutting-edge methods, tools, analyses, resources, reviews, news and commentary, supporting life sciences research. Tweets by editors.

155 849Followers

1 086Following

5 806Posts total

27.4KViews on collected posts

Son gönderiler

Nature Methods@naturemethods3 Sep

@naturemethods "Hey, what's the big deal about spatial-ATAC-Hi-C enabling chromatin accessibility in brain samplesd Looks like some fancy epigenetic analysis to me!". 129 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Nature Methods@naturemethods3 Sep

In our latest Technology Feature, @CarolineSeydel explores how mechanical forces such as tension and compression influence tissue differentiation, and how cell biologists are observing and manipulating such forces in living systems. https://t.co/psfPYQCpMa 4.8K views · 16 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Nature Methods@naturemethods3 Sep

Spatial-ATAC-Hi-C enables profiling chromatin accessibility and spatial organization, as shown in mouse and human brain samples. https://t.co/SUmtBKnTsI 6.4K views · 81 likes · 13 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Nature Methods@naturemethods1 Sep

A Perspective from Deininger, Caldarelli, Zernicka-Goetz, and Mikut examines the role of AI-based image analysis as applied to stem cell-derived models. https://t.co/IKyLXmlxaC https://t.co/TZoHIisGha

5.4K views · 22 likes · 10 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Nature Methods@naturemethods1 Sep

In their Perspective, @labs_mann, Bing Zhang, Tiannan Guo and colleagues discuss key areas in proteomics where AI is poised to drive advances. https://t.co/r4rRzkgmXs 5.1K views · 3 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Nature Methods@naturemethods1 Sep

In our August 'Points of View', Helena Jambor and Alexander Lex discuss how to reuse, remix and vibe code scientific figures. https://t.co/vhMjG2sSou https://t.co/GRINIauGbU

5.5K views · 29 likes · 8 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Aynı büyüklükteki hesaplara karşı

Son 90 güne ait 6 gönderi, 100K–1M takipçi aralığıyla yan yana. geniş kitleye gösteriliyor, ama izleyenlerin azı tepki veriyor.

Medyan görüntülenme5 266bu hesap6 369100K–1M için medyan

Erişim, %3.38%bu hesap1.92%100K–1M için medyan

Etkileşim, %0.49%bu hesap1.15%100K–1M için medyan

Ölçüt	Bu hesap	100K–1M için medyan	Oran
Gönderi başına medyan görüntülenme	5 266	6 369	0.83×
Erişim (görüntülenme ÷ takipçi)	3.38%	1.92%	1.76×
Etkileşim oranı	0.49%	1.15%	0.43×

Bu aralıktaki diğer hesaplar → Başka bir hesapla karşılaştır → Bu kıyas değerleri nasıl kuruluyor →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

5.5K1 Sep

5.1K

5.4K

6.4K3 Sep

4.8K

129

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.69%1 Sep

0.12%

0.61%

1.48%3 Sep

0.37%

0.00%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 1.15%.

What the audience does

Likes55.9%151 in total

Reposts13.0%35 in total

Replies0.7%2 in total

Quotes0.7%2 in total

Bookmarks29.6%80 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Son gönderiler

Aynı büyüklükteki hesaplara karşı

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Benzer hesaplar