tweetindex
DE

Patrick Jaicomo ✓

@pjaicomo · Arlington, VA · joined 08 May 2019

Litigator at the Institute for Justice. Lover of freedom. Fighter of bullies. Opposer of military adventurism. (All posts have typos and express my own views.)

13 353Followers
2 989Following
31 556Posts total
101.8KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

If you cut a road through the law to get to the Devil, you're cutting a road for the Devil to get to you. https://t.co/Qs4EEZosC1
2.8K views · 140 likes · 25 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
Federal officials who want to violate the Constitution without consequence after Egbert v. Boule demolished the Bivens cause of action. 768 views · 5 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Government officials who want to violate the Constitution without consequence after Harlow v. Fitzgerald created qualified immunity. 1.5K views · 38 likes · 2 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
If you’re arguing that police have ample oversight, warrants are a low bar. Here’s a magistrate noting his first rejection of a warrant after granting more than 1,000. And studies have shown that judges grant almost all warrants, often reviewing them for just minutes. https://
28.5K views · 401 likes · 38 reposts · 25 replies Open on X →
This is demonstrably false. Judges can absolutely kick warrants if there’s no probable cause. Almost all major police departments have internal affairs bureaus and many DA’s offices have public integrity units to investigate alleged police misconduct. American law enforcement in 35.3K views · 26 likes · 1 reposts · 32 replies Open on X →
QUALIFIED IMMUNITY NEWS: My @IJ colleague Daniel Nelson and I are now published in @HarvardJLPP with our article Section 1983 (Still) Displaces Qualified Immunity. We explain how the long-lost "Notwithstanding Clause" of §1983 proves Reconstruction Congress prohibited QI. 1/ h
33K views · 341 likes · 101 reposts · 32 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

5 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. wird mehr Menschen gezeigt als Konten gleicher Größe.

Medianaufrufe2 803dieses Konto924Median für 10K–100K
Reichweite, %20.99%dieses Konto3.62%Median für 10K–100K
Interaktion, %1.65%dieses Konto1.52%Median für 10K–100K
KennzahlDieses KontoMedian für 10K–100KVerhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag2 8039243.03×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)20.99%3.62%5.80×
Interaktionsrate1.65%1.52%1.08×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe →   Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen →   Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

33K30 Jan
35.3K7 Sep
28.5K8 Sep
1.5K
768
2.8K

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.46%30 Jan
0.19%7 Sep
1.65%8 Sep
2.90%
0.91%
6.03%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes69.1%951 in total
Reposts12.2%168 in total
Replies7.0%96 in total
Quotes1.5%20 in total
Bookmarks10.2%141 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Ähnliche Konten