Patrick Jaicomo ✓

@pjaicomo · Arlington, VA · joined 08 May 2019

Litigator at the Institute for Justice. Lover of freedom. Fighter of bullies. Opposer of military adventurism. (All posts have typos and express my own views.)

13 353Followers

2 989Following

31 556Posts total

101.8KViews on collected posts

Son gönderiler

Patrick Jaicomo ✓@pjaicomo8 Sep

If you cut a road through the law to get to the Devil, you're cutting a road for the Devil to get to you. https://t.co/Qs4EEZosC1

2.8K views · 140 likes · 25 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Patrick Jaicomo ✓@pjaicomo8 Sep

Federal officials who want to violate the Constitution without consequence after Egbert v. Boule demolished the Bivens cause of action. 768 views · 5 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Patrick Jaicomo ✓@pjaicomo8 Sep

Government officials who want to violate the Constitution without consequence after Harlow v. Fitzgerald created qualified immunity. 1.5K views · 38 likes · 2 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Patrick Jaicomo ✓@pjaicomo8 Sep

If you’re arguing that police have ample oversight, warrants are a low bar. Here’s a magistrate noting his first rejection of a warrant after granting more than 1,000. And studies have shown that judges grant almost all warrants, often reviewing them for just minutes. https://

28.5K views · 401 likes · 38 reposts · 25 replies Open on X →

Patrick Jaicomo ✓@pjaicomo7 Sep

This is demonstrably false. Judges can absolutely kick warrants if there’s no probable cause. Almost all major police departments have internal affairs bureaus and many DA’s offices have public integrity units to investigate alleged police misconduct. American law enforcement in 35.3K views · 26 likes · 1 reposts · 32 replies Open on X →

Patrick Jaicomo ✓@pjaicomo30 Jan

QUALIFIED IMMUNITY NEWS: My @IJ colleague Daniel Nelson and I are now published in @HarvardJLPP with our article Section 1983 (Still) Displaces Qualified Immunity. We explain how the long-lost "Notwithstanding Clause" of §1983 proves Reconstruction Congress prohibited QI. 1/ h

33K views · 341 likes · 101 reposts · 32 replies Open on X →

Aynı büyüklükteki hesaplara karşı

Son 90 güne ait 5 gönderi, 10K–100K takipçi aralığıyla yan yana. aynı büyüklükteki hesaplardan daha çok kişiye gösteriliyor.

Medyan görüntülenme2 803bu hesap92410K–100K için medyan

Erişim, %20.99%bu hesap3.62%10K–100K için medyan

Etkileşim, %1.65%bu hesap1.52%10K–100K için medyan

Ölçüt	Bu hesap	10K–100K için medyan	Oran
Gönderi başına medyan görüntülenme	2 803	924	3.03×
Erişim (görüntülenme ÷ takipçi)	20.99%	3.62%	5.80×
Etkileşim oranı	1.65%	1.52%	1.08×

Bu aralıktaki diğer hesaplar → Başka bir hesapla karşılaştır → Bu kıyas değerleri nasıl kuruluyor →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

33K30 Jan

35.3K7 Sep

28.5K8 Sep

1.5K

768

2.8K

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.46%30 Jan

0.19%7 Sep

1.65%8 Sep

2.90%

0.91%

6.03%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes69.1%951 in total

Reposts12.2%168 in total

Replies7.0%96 in total

Quotes1.5%20 in total

Bookmarks10.2%141 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Son gönderiler

Aynı büyüklükteki hesaplara karşı

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Benzer hesaplar