Ruth Deyermond
@ruth_deyermond · joined 15 Oct 2014
Senior Lecturer, Dept of War Studies, King's College London. Russian and US foreign & security policy, US-Russia relations, European security. Views my own.
31 334Followers
3 813Following
11 195Posts total
913.9KViews on collected posts
Neueste Beiträge
Wir suchen neue Beiträge…
For them, win-win means that both Russia and the US win. Or, more accurately, both Russia and the Trump inner circle.
6.4K views · 177 likes
· 47 reposts · 8 replies
Open on X →
That has always been very obviously the case for Trump and his circle - from every public statement, draft agreement, and report about what's gone on behind closed doors. And if it was about actual peacemaking, not moneymaking, Trump wouldn't have sent these two. https://t.co/Noc
5.1K views · 90 likes
· 24 reposts · 3 replies
Open on X →
After a day sitting opposite Kushner and Witkoff, it’s clear they see Russia’s invasion as a business deal
They keep amplifying what Putin wants, what Russia can gain and what Ukraine must give up.
This is what happens when Trump sends real-estate developers to negotiate a war.
253.8K views · 11.9K likes
· 3.4K reposts · 558 replies
Open on X →
0:10
Neither the sombre photos nor the text of this tweet suggest the Ukrainian government expects anything positive from the meeting. That's not surprising, but it's interesting that they're signalling it so clearly.
12.9K views · 203 likes
· 57 reposts · 5 replies
Open on X →
A meeting with our negotiating team ahead of the meeting with the U.S. President’s envoys. We are ready for the conversation. Ukraine has always been and will remain constructive. We are interested in bringing the end of the war closer. Peace is needed. Security guarantees are ht
282.1K views · 7.5K likes
· 1.2K reposts · 701 replies
Open on X →
This was 3 hours before they left the Kremlin.
11.4K views · 40 likes
· 8 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
Logistically, if Kushner & Witkoff are still in Moscow at the time of writing this, there is next to no chance they can mathematically arrive in Kyiv by tomorrow morning unless they fly directly from Moscow, which would be an extraordinary thing to happen in and of itself.
45.2K views · 519 likes
· 44 reposts · 16 replies
Open on X →
@ruth_deyermond What about what could be called ‘innocent plagiarism’, where someone paraphrases an existing text without attribution because they didn’t know of it?
21 views · 1 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
@ruth_deyermond Thanks for the well written post. This exactly chimes with my experience and belief. Unfortunately some 'stars' are more protected than others, but even with the protection they still have to correct it.
263 views · 2 likes
· 0 reposts · 0 replies
Open on X →
I've encountered plagiarism twice in PhD work. In one case, it was a minor and obvious transcription error that was corrected and not repeated; in the other, the student didn't complete the PhD (this was one of several reasons why).
2K views · 40 likes
· 3 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
All this is to say that I have a very strict view of plagiarism and a lot of exposure to work written by scholars in my field over many years, and plagiarism is very, very rare in my experience and absolutely not tolerated.
2.1K views · 59 likes
· 4 reposts · 4 replies
Open on X →
In over 20 years of peer reviewing journal articles, I think I've seen 3 cases of plagiarism. I've seen one case in the dozens of articles that have come to me as associate editor. All of these were small instances - a few sentences - and all were treated as plagiarism.
1.5K views · 43 likes
· 5 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
Any amount of plagiarism from two sentences upwards is enough for me to treat something as plagiarised. To be clear on what I mean by plagiarism, this is an explainer I wrote for my students a few years ago: https://t.co/esEhzfoOvt
2.2K views · 47 likes
· 7 reposts · 4 replies
Open on X →
It's also worth saying, for context, that I'm *very* alert to plagiarism and that I deal with it whenever I see it. I've spotted and dealt with plagiarism at all levels: undergrad and Masters work; PhDs; in work I'm peer reviewing; and as associate journal editor.
1.8K views · 43 likes
· 3 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
It's worth saying that I see a lot of other scholars' work, beyond what I read for research: as a journal's associate editor; as a regular peer reviewer for other journals; having sat on a national PhD prize jury; supervising and examining PhDs; and having run a job competition.
3.8K views · 45 likes
· 3 reposts · 3 replies
Open on X →
I've just seen yet another claim on here that plagiarism is common in academia (this time from Nathan Cofnas). In my experience, this claim is absolutely untrue, and it's both misleading and damaging to suggest otherwise. Short 🧵
16.2K views · 198 likes
· 34 reposts · 12 replies
Open on X →
It's New Year, so time to look back and forward. These are 10 things I think we need to recognise in 2026. It’s a response to what I think are profoundly damaging mistaken assumptions I’ve heard and read from practitioners, journalists, and analysts in 2025. Warning: very long🧵
267.2K views · 1.2K likes
· 474 reposts · 39 replies
Open on X →
Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe
16 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. wird weit über das eigene Publikum hinaus gezeigt, und es reagiert.
Medianaufrufe4 416dieses Konto924Median für 10K–100K
Reichweite, %14.09%dieses Konto3.62%Median für 10K–100K
Interaktion, %2.47%dieses Konto1.52%Median für 10K–100K
| Kennzahl | Dieses Konto | Median für 10K–100K | Verhältnis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag | 4 416 | 924 | 4.78× |
| Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower) | 14.09% | 3.62% | 3.89× |
| Interaktionsrate | 2.47% | 1.52% | 1.62× |
Weitere Konten dieser Größe → Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen → Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →
Growth & engagement
How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.
Views per post
1.8K20 Aug
2.2K
1.5K
2.1K
2K
26321 Aug
21
45.2K5 Sep
11.4K
282.1K6 Sep
12.9K
253.8K
5.1K
6.4K
Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.
Engagement rate per post
2.63%20 Aug
2.72%
3.38%
3.25%
2.18%
0.76%21 Aug
9.52%
1.28%5 Sep
0.43%
3.31%6 Sep
2.05%
6.25%
2.31%
3.61%
Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.
What the audience does
Likes75.1%22 054 in total
Reposts18.0%5 269 in total
Replies4.6%1 358 in total
Quotes0.0%9 in total
Bookmarks2.2%659 in total
Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.
Followers by day
6 Sep
Daily snapshots since 06 Sep 2026; the dashed line is the starting count.
Ähnliche Konten
Darren Webb
@United_Webby
62.7K followers
· 108.7K posts
Marcin Horała ✓
@mhorala
62.7K followers
· 43.6K posts
CZ Calls ✓
@CZ_Calls
62.7K followers
· 86.8K posts
Matthew Ray
@mattysmalls
62.7K followers
· 17K posts
Samuel
@SamuelErz
62.7K followers
· 21.1K posts
Naresh Nambisan I ValuationMantra I SEBI Reg RA ✓
@nareshbahrain
62.7K followers
· 77.9K posts
Jerry Production ✓
@JerryPHD
62.7K followers
· 42.4K posts
바이승 ✓
@by_seung
62.7K followers
· 45.4K posts