tweetindex
ES

AfriForum

@afriforum · Pretoria · joined 25 May 2010

AfriForum sorg dat jou gemeenskap se stem gehoor word in ‘n samelewing waar minderhede toenemend geïgnoreer word.

135 653Followers
2 855Following
48 667Posts total
62.2KViews on collected posts

Últimas publicaciones

Entrepreneurs se fisieke, emosionele en geestelike welstand in die kollig by @AfriForum Sakenetwerk-geleentheid https://t.co/A0fKgZkylD https://t.co/3TS2HY9Ipb
196 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Buitensporige brandstofpryse: AfriForum sê: "𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗼𝗲𝗴!" Ernst van Zyl en Louis Boshoff gesels oor hoe buitensporige brandstofpryse Suid-Afrikaanse verbruikers, besighede, boere, en die ekonomie raak, asook hoe AfriForum dit beveg. Kyk hier: https://t.co/Kb2yBfixCC https://t.co/4r
308 views · 8 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
.@AfriForum versoek verhoor terwyl Johannesburg-metro steeds vrae oor waterheffing ontduik https://t.co/XMcDiOlZnn https://t.co/zZFgZInB6f
1.1K views · 24 likes · 4 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
.@AfriForum stel ultimatum aan Matlosana-munisipaliteit oor rou riool wat steeds in Vaalrivier vloei https://t.co/EXfoCoadvw https://t.co/6WB4vuuRN6
1.3K views · 20 likes · 4 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Swak dienslewering: Erkenning alleen gaan nie Suid-Afrika se munisipaliteite red nie https://t.co/rfvH1uxTEc https://t.co/IBJgl0qnma
1.6K views · 34 likes · 5 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
"@AfriForum sal hom nie deur die @MYANC laat voorskryf nie." - @kalliekriel https://t.co/Dv9qmgeT2B
2:46
1.3K views · 82 likes · 20 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
@afriforum @Eskom_SA So now we won’t support this because it’s a racist party initiative???? Phambili nge Afriforum phambili!!!! 134 views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@afriforum @Eskom_SA https://t.co/G1UdpLegWb
146 views · 8 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
“Consumers cannot be expected to finance Eskom’s profit party. If @Eskom_SA is selling less electricity, making billions in profit and improving its financial position, then continually increasing tariffs cannot be the answer,” concludes @mmostert79. 482 views · 8 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
.@AfriForum will scrutinise @Eskom_SA application and submit formal comments to NERSA. The organisation is of the opinion that the regulator should not only consider @Eskom_SA prosperity, We hope that this time the regulator will consider not only Eskom’s prosperity, but also 477 views · 7 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
“It is irrational that @Eskom_SA remains hundreds of billions of rands in debt while still paying substantial performance incentives. A utility in such a precarious financial position has no business rewarding its executives while demanding that struggling consumers pay even 341 views · 8 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Consumers should therefore only be expected to pay costs that are necessary, reasonable, efficient and prudently incurred. Excessive or inadequately justified remuneration, irregular expenditure and payments arising from failures to comply with procurement or contractual 293 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The Electricity Pricing Policy further requires electricity prices to be based on an efficient and prudent utility, to reflect least-cost options and to exclude inefficiencies. 303 views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The Electricity Regulation Act 4 of 2006 together with its amendments requires tariffs to enable an efficient licensee to recover the costs of its licensed activities. 317 views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
.@AfriForum emphasises that @Eskom_SA is not automatically entitled to recover every expense it incurs from electricity consumers. 361 views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
“It is indefensible for @Eskom_SA to plead poverty when applying for tariff increases and then boast about a multibillion-rand profit while paying executives millions of rand in incentives and extraordinary benefits. Consumers are expected to tighten their belts every year, but 406 views · 9 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Consumers are buying less electricity but paying more for it. According to @afriforum this is not a sustainable solution, but rather a vicious cycle. Higher tariffs push households and businesses towards alternatives, which reduces @Eskom_SA sales even further and creates yet 412 views · 11 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
According to @mmostert79, @afriforum Manager for Local Government Affairs, @Eskom_SA logic does not add up. “Electricity sales fell by 6.2%, yet its revenue increased because of ridiculously high tariffs. Now Eskom wants to raise tariffs, above inflation – again. In a market 400 views · 13 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
While @Eskom_SA applies for this tariff increase, citizens continue to grapple with rising living costs and years of sharp increases in electricity tariffs. 681 views · 22 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
.@AfriForum will oppose @Eskom_SA application for an average tariff increase of approximately 8.8% for 2027/28 and submit formal comments to the National Energy Regulator of South Africa (NERSA). According to the organisation, the power utility is set – within the span of just a 638 views · 31 likes · 5 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
.@AfriForum to oppose @Eskom_SA application to further burden consumers to enrich themselves https://t.co/yPFOnqbihO
10.4K views · 1.1K likes · 320 reposts · 33 replies Open on X →
“Daar kan nie van verbruikers verwag word om Eskom se winsfees te finansier nie. As @Eskom_SA minder elektrisiteit verkoop, miljarde in wins maak en sy finansiële posisie verbeter, kan die voortdurende verhoging van tariewe nie die antwoord wees nie,” sluit @mmostert79 af. 352 views · 2 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
“Dit is irrasioneel dat @Eskom_SA steeds honderde miljarde rand in die skuld is, terwyl hy steeds aansienlike prestasiebonusse betaal. ’n Nutsmaatskappy in só ’n wankelrige finansiële posisie behoort nie sy bestuurders te beloon terwyl hy van sukkelende verbruikers vereis om 179 views · 0 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
.@AfriForum sal @Eskom_SA se aansoek noukeurig bestudeer en formele kommentaar indien by NERSA. Die organisasie meen dat die reguleerder nie alleenlik die welvaart van @Eskom_SA in ag moet neem nie, maar ook wat gewone verbruikers werklik kan bekostig. 335 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Daar moet dus slegs van verbruikers verwag word om kostes te betaal wat noodsaaklik, redelik, doeltreffend en verstandig aangegaan is. 185 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Oormatige of onvoldoende geregverdigde vergoeding, onreëlmatige uitgawes en betalings wat voortspruit uit versuim om aan verkrygings- of kontraktuele vereistes te voldoen, moet nie deur elektrisiteitstariewe deurgegee word nie. 176 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Die elektrisiteitsprysbeleid vereis verder dat elektrisiteitspryse gebaseer moet wees op ’n doeltreffende en verstandige nutsdiens, om die laagste koste-opsies te weerspieël en om ondoeltreffendheid uit te skakel. 196 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Die Wet op Elektrisiteitsregulering 4 van 2006 tesame met sy wysigings vereis dat tariewe ’n doeltreffende lisensiehouer in staat moet stel om die koste van sy gelisensieerde aktiwiteite te verhaal. 204 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
.@AfriForum beklemtoon dat @Eskom_SA nie outomaties daarop geregtig is om elke uitgawe wat hy aangaan, van elektrisiteitsverbruikers te verhaal nie. 210 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Daar word van verbruikers verwag om elke jaar die gordel stywer te trek, maar dieselfde standaard geld blykbaar nie vir @Eskom_SA -self nie,” sê @mmostert79. 238 views · 1 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Frente a cuentas del mismo tamaño

40 publicaciones de los últimos 90 días, junto al rango de 100K–1M seguidores. llega a menos gente que sus pares, pero los implica mucho más.

Visualizaciones medianas356esta cuenta5 971mediana de 100K–1M
Alcance, %0.26%esta cuenta1.57%mediana de 100K–1M
Interacción, %1.88%esta cuenta0.99%mediana de 100K–1M
MétricaEsta cuentaMediana de 100K–1MProporción
Visualizaciones medianas por publicación3565 9710.06×
Alcance (visualizaciones ÷ seguidores)0.26%1.57%0.17×
Tasa de interacción1.88%0.99%1.90×

Otras cuentas de este rango →   Comparar con otra cuenta →   Cómo se construyen estas referencias →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

3177 Sep
303
293
341
477
482
146
1348 Sep
1.3K
1.6K9 Sep
1.3K
1.1K
30810 Sep
196

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

2.21%7 Sep
2.31%
2.05%
2.93%
1.68%
2.07%
6.16%
5.22%8 Sep
7.96%
2.45%9 Sep
1.81%
2.56%
3.57%10 Sep
0.51%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.99%.

What the audience does

Likes74.7%1 383 in total
Reposts20.1%372 in total
Replies3.2%60 in total
Quotes1.0%18 in total
Bookmarks1.0%19 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

Followers by day

8 Sep

Daily snapshots since 08 Sep 2026; the dashed line is the starting count.

Cuentas similares