tweetindex
ES

pete wolfendale ✓

@deontologistics · Kamakura, Japan · joined 05 Apr 2011

Wandering philosopher. Purveyor of Platonic heresy, Kantian computationalism, and Hegelian minimalism. (he/him/it which speaks). Also on the butterfly site.

10 205Followers
353Following
40 978Posts total
78KViews on collected posts

Últimas publicaciones

What about people who want to make their own insulin pumps? Or cochlear implants? Specifying exactly how much capacity people should be allowed to give themselves is telling them how much freedom they deserve. All medicine is inherently unnatural, in the best sense of that term. 43 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@deontologistics it's also just philosophically indefensible if you hold yourself to modern (read: kantian / post kantian) standards of proof and argumentation! 133 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Getting a real ‘nice guy’ turned ‘Death of the West’ vibe here. https://t.co/ketaJ4Ycqa
733 views · 7 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@deontologistics a parody of unsubtle thinking will indeed appear unsubtle. yes https://t.co/w2nY0JIqFi 967 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
It looks like I’ve finally been found by the metaphor police. Tell my wife I love her. 1.2K views · 14 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@deontologistics @freganmitts @Tyler_A_Harper 'Normative naturalism is a philosophical cancer.' incredible self-own. an all-timer. 1.5K views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@deontologistics was worried for a second, but then I realized my naturalism isn’t normative 147 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@deontologistics I am an ethical naturalist of a kind. But that label does not mean much absent of filling in what the position is and entails. Not clear to me that generalizations like this are good for much more than twitter. 275 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@deontologistics @madeleineebaker nerds who want magnets in their fingers aren't an oppressed class 69 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
When I say I take a hard line on normative naturalism, I mean it very seriously. I think it is an ideological poison because it is something adopted for very well intended and aesthetically palatable reasons but ultimately grows into the grandest of ethical atrocities. 3K views · 38 likes · 0 reposts · 11 replies Open on X →
@deontologistics https://t.co/4AwdRrluWN
62 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@willmacaskill @tjohnlinward Needless to say, share and share widely, if you are so inclined. It helps me put more of this out into the universe, whatever it is. 🖖 340 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@willmacaskill @tjohnlinward And if you prefer a visual medium and would like a demostration of my sheer philosophical stamina, and the fact that, yes, I do really understand Nick Land's philosophical system and can quite precisely identify the tensions in it, you want this: http 1.1K views · 10 likes · 2 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@willmacaskill And a bit of short fiction co-authored with @tjohnlinward that narrativises my thoughts on the concept of value: https://t.co/Xggfk9iiKK 388 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@willmacaskill An old but fun piece on the Glass Bead Game, Hegel, and the problem with defining the concept of game: https://t.co/0TtbhBk0wf 383 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@willmacaskill And another interview with them in which I explain the problems with defining what a concept is, the different historical approaches to it, and the upshot for the relation between epistemology and metaphysics: https://t.co/8f2AqVpPDt 358 views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@willmacaskill Here's an interview with the philosopher on what I call the embodiment paradigm, trying to make a balanced assessment of its virtues and vices: https://t.co/S8tJUjsByy 388 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Here's my longform review of @willmacaskill's book, which gives the outline of my views in negative by doing my best to hammer home the horrors implied by easy consequentialist solutions to optimising the state of the universe: https://t.co/T3Y8fEmaTw 449 views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Here's Geist in the Machine. Be aware that it was compressed about as hard as it could be to fit within a word limit: https://t.co/81SQmbVeYz 524 views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Here the old pinned tweet, showing The Revenge of Reason in all its glory. https://t.co/ixUDKU4Gx9 1.1K views · 9 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
If you've read The Revenge of Reason or 'Geist in the Machine' you'll know what you're in for, but I figure I should provide some links to representative pieces of my writing for those who are on the fence about giving an itinerant Twitter philosopher money. 1.1K views · 13 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
I'm generally a bit shy about asking for money like this, not least because my ups and downs have, in the past, posed a significant problem to sustaining long term projects. But that was also largely in part to a lack of money, so what's a guy to do? https://t.co/DP2BAtIPwp 9K views · 50 likes · 9 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →
Okay, so the day I finally crack 10K followers seems like the best time to announce this, following in the steps of @peligrietzer, I have just put up a Manifund pitch for a project I am running on the concept of self and the way implicit assumptions about it cloud AI discourse. 7.7K views · 84 likes · 9 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
Obligatory pinned tweet: my new book, The Revenge of Reason, is available to purchase here: https://t.co/Z0vCbdDLoc https://t.co/BoZAniDgly
46.9K views · 382 likes · 32 reposts · 12 replies Open on X →

Frente a cuentas del mismo tamaño

23 publicaciones de los últimos 90 días, junto al rango de 10K–100K seguidores. justo en la mediana de su rango de seguidores.

Visualizaciones medianas449esta cuenta924mediana de 10K–100K
Alcance, %4.40%esta cuenta3.62%mediana de 10K–100K
Interacción, %1.29%esta cuenta1.52%mediana de 10K–100K
MétricaEsta cuentaMediana de 10K–100KProporción
Visualizaciones medianas por publicación4499240.49×
Alcance (visualizaciones ÷ seguidores)4.40%3.62%1.22×
Tasa de interacción1.29%1.52%0.85×

Otras cuentas de este rango →   Comparar con otra cuenta →   Cómo se construyen estas referencias →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

38829 Jul
1.1K
340
6223 Aug
3K14 Sep
69
275
147
1.5K
1.2K
967
733
13315 Sep
43

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.55%29 Jul
1.30%
1.18%
1.61%23 Aug
1.61%14 Sep
0.00%
1.09%
2.04%
0.00%
1.20%
0.10%
1.09%
2.26%15 Sep
2.33%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes66.0%650 in total
Reposts5.4%53 in total
Replies5.0%49 in total
Bookmarks23.7%233 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Cuentas similares