tweetindex
ES

Lisa Rubin ✓

@lawofruby · New York, NY · joined 25 Jan 2017

@MSNOWnews senior legal reporter & recovering litigator; former: off-air legal analyst @maddow, @wagnertonight. Don’t let the pearls fool ya.

255 879Followers
2 481Following
9 080Posts total
640.4KViews on collected posts

Últimas publicaciones

NEW: Judge Indira Talwani issues a 49-page preliminary injunction opinion indefinitely blocking implementation of the USPS mail ballot rule for this election cycle. Theoretically, this moots the USPS's existing SCOTUS application, which is aimed at her prior temporary restraining 68.5K views · 2.9K likes · 643 reposts · 73 replies Open on X →
And still blocked? The USPS mail-in ballot rule scheduled to be published in final form in the Federal Register tomorrow. FIN. 13.3K views · 305 likes · 28 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →
The bottom line? The court found a violation of its injunction but ordered no relief. And that means we're still practically where we were last night: SCOTUS's stay of the CA v. Trump injunction means Trump can implement some, but not all, provisions of the elections EO. 3/ 15.8K views · 302 likes · 32 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
@lawofruby These judges, not the trump judges, are the most frustrating. Because in assuming, time after time, the most benign interpretation and good faith of Trump’s actions, they apply technicalities in a way that does a grave disservice to the law and the American people. 9.2K views · 137 likes · 7 reposts · 11 replies Open on X →
Instead, she suggests plaintiffs could file an amended complaint challenging the newly final rule, now that it is no longer hypothetical. (CA AG Rob Bonta has already signaled his intent to challenge the final rule.) 2/ 22.8K views · 605 likes · 82 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
NEW: Judge Indira Talwani finds that by issuing a final rule on whose mail or absentee ballots it will and will not transmit, USPS has, in fact, violated her existing preliminary injunction. But she also holds the plaintiffs' requested relief is no different than the status quo 111K views · 1.9K likes · 328 reposts · 21 replies Open on X →
Bill Essayli's hometown paper is asking DOJ the same question I did: Does the Ninth Circuit ruling about Sigal Chattah apply to him too? (Neither of us got an answer beyond DOJ's assertion to seek relief from SCOTUS.) 25.7K views · 177 likes · 36 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
My latest: Trump's top federal prosecutor in L.A. could face new challenge after appellate ruling https://t.co/9671D9trmj 25.5K views · 25 likes · 8 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
And then the DOJ asserts that it does not matter whether Trump or any president "has an influence on the prosecutorial decisions of his subordinates (as the Constitution plainly contemplates," but that the legal test examines only "whether those prosecutors have exercised their 19.1K views · 288 likes · 27 reposts · 12 replies Open on X →
@lawofruby This isn’t just about Comey. DOJ asking a federal court to bless the principle that a president can direct the machinery of federal prosecution against his political enemies is absurd. I hope Comey wins—and that the court draws a very clear line here. 16.5K views · 458 likes · 42 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
And then DOJ further argues -- noting President Kennedy's selection of his brother as his attorney general, which predates post-Watergate reforms and norms -- that "as a matter of historical analysis," DOJ's purported independence "is a myth." 4/ 30.8K views · 459 likes · 37 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
“The purported 'independence' of DOJ that Comey cites is antithetical to the constitutional separation of powers (which lodges the Executive power in the President alone)." 3/ 29.9K views · 478 likes · 39 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
It argues that even if there were evidence that Trump had ordered Blanche or the relevant US Attorney to indict Comey, “the Chief Executive directing his subordinates to exercise core Executive functions is a feature, not a bug, of our constitutional system.” 2/ 29.3K views · 504 likes · 52 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
NEW: DOJ’s brief opposing Comey's motion to dismiss for selective and vindictive prosecution doubles down on the argument Todd Blanche made on the Sunday shows over the weekend: The DOJ need not be independent of the president. 1/ 141K views · 1.7K likes · 293 reposts · 48 replies Open on X →
NEW: A Department of Justice spokesperson, asked for comment on the Ninth Circuit's ruling disqualifying Nevada's acting U.S. Attorney Sigal Chattah tells MS NOW, "We disagree with the 9th Circuit’s decision and we plan to appeal this decision to the Supreme Court.” 25.9K views · 330 likes · 57 reposts · 16 replies Open on X →
NEW: A 9th Circuit panel unanimously upholds the disqualification of Nevada's acting U.S. Attorney Sigal Chattah. But its reasoning likely applies to Bill Essayli, who was appointed First Assistant U.S. Attorney after his own acting tenure ran out. 1/ 56K views · 787 likes · 122 reposts · 8 replies Open on X →

Frente a cuentas del mismo tamaño

16 publicaciones de los últimos 90 días, junto al rango de 100K–1M seguidores. llega mucho más allá de su propia audiencia, y esa audiencia responde.

Visualizaciones medianas25 818esta cuenta5 983mediana de 100K–1M
Alcance, %10.09%esta cuenta1.49%mediana de 100K–1M
Interacción, %1.72%esta cuenta0.93%mediana de 100K–1M
MétricaEsta cuentaMediana de 100K–1MProporción
Visualizaciones medianas por publicación25 8185 9834.32×
Alcance (visualizaciones ÷ seguidores)10.09%1.49%6.77×
Tasa de interacción1.72%0.93%1.86×

Otras cuentas de este rango →   Comparar con otra cuenta →   Cómo se construyen estas referencias →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

141K19 Aug
29.3K
29.9K
30.8K
16.5K
19.1K
25.5K
25.7K
111K25 Aug
22.8K
9.2K
15.8K
13.3K
68.5K4 Sep

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.47%19 Aug
1.93%
1.73%
1.63%
3.06%
1.71%
0.14%
0.84%
2.02%25 Aug
3.05%
1.70%
2.14%
2.55%
5.29%4 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes82.0%11 370 in total
Reposts13.2%1 833 in total
Replies1.6%226 in total
Quotes0.3%43 in total
Bookmarks2.8%392 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Cuentas similares