tweetindex
FR

Scott Nover

@ScottNover · Washington, DC · joined 21 Jul 2013

I write about media for the @washingtonpost and teach journalism at @smpagwu • Send tips securely via Signal: scottnover.99

25 757Followers
5 438Following
30 533Posts total
6.3MViews on collected posts

Derniers posts

@ScottNover https://t.co/IJ1c9LQEa1
1.1K views · 192 likes · 9 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
There will effectively be no TV coverage of Trump's UN visit or other presidential events, though I imagine smaller networks may take the White House's own feed. This is a very big deal and one only possible because of solidarity from the whole pool. https://t.co/CnkUUScgsM 18.3K views · 313 likes · 41 reposts · 119 replies Open on X →
BREAKING: TV pool will not be providing coverage of presidential events until further notice b/c of CNN's ban, pool chair and FOX News Washington Bureau Chief Bryan Boughton said. It's effectively a boycott by the fellow members — ABC, CBS, NBC and FOX: https://t.co/CnkUUScgsM
515.8K views · 4.4K likes · 826 reposts · 876 replies Open on X →
Chiming in from vacation to say you should read this great story by @DanLamothe and @TaraCopp: 1.6K views · 20 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
The Stars and Stripes case was reassigned to Judge Trevor McFadden, a Trump appointee. 1.2K views · 2 likes · 7 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
This case has been assigned to Judge Christopher Cooper, an Obama appointee. 2.7K views · 6 likes · 4 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
BREAKING: Fired Stars and Stripes staffers, including the editor and publisher, sued the Pentagon on Thursday alleging that their firings were retaliatory and violate their First Amendment rights. w/ @liamjscott https://t.co/Qu4Y2dRtGu 45.6K views · 448 likes · 126 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
Scoop: The Pentagon barred press photographers from briefings on the ongoing U.S.-Israeli military conflict with Iran after they published photos of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that his staff deemed "unflattering." https://t.co/4EbXGWkVHt 937.9K views · 1.7K likes · 595 reposts · 389 replies Open on X →
@knightcolumbia @MikeBalsamo1 Some members of Congress have begun reacting to our report, condemning the Pentagon's policy. https://t.co/GMa07Jr7BK 11.7K views · 117 likes · 24 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
@knightcolumbia “If the news about our military must first be approved by the government, then the public is no longer getting independent reporting,” said @MikeBalsamo1, the organization’s president. “It is getting only what officials want them to see. That should alarm every Am 40.6K views · 872 likes · 220 reposts · 21 replies Open on X →
@knightcolumbia An ominous sight in the Pentagon today. https://t.co/oXyo96hhwY 63.2K views · 461 likes · 110 reposts · 24 replies Open on X →
@knightcolumbia Here's one part of the policy document that raised eyebrows. https://t.co/0E0hF7tD9J 46.4K views · 345 likes · 86 reposts · 13 replies Open on X →
@knightcolumbia In a statement, the Pentagon has doubled down on this policy: “These are basic, common-sense guidelines to protect sensitive information as well as the protection of national security and the safety of all who work at the Pentagon." https://t.co/BevMzPh2C3 60.6K views · 297 likes · 47 reposts · 17 replies Open on X →
@ScottNover @washingtonpost https://t.co/1dgNlDQQaY 23.8K views · 478 likes · 59 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Katie Fallow from @knightcolumbia said the new policy is part of “the Trump administration’s broader assault on free speech and press freedom.” “A reporter who publishes only what the government ‘authorizes’ is doing something other than reporting,” she said. 138.5K views · 1.4K likes · 258 reposts · 21 replies Open on X →
NEW: The Pentagon told journalists it will require them to pledge they won’t gather any information — even unclassified — that hasn’t been expressly authorized for release, and will revoke the press credentials of those who do not obey. @washingtonpost https://t.co/8lmPMb553G 4.4M views · 4.9K likes · 2.5K reposts · 819 replies Open on X →

Face aux comptes de taille comparable

7 posts des 90 derniers jours, à côté de la tranche de 10K–100K abonnés. diffusé à plus de monde que les comptes de taille comparable.

Vues médianes2 678ce compte924médiane pour 10K–100K
Portée, %10.40%ce compte3.62%médiane pour 10K–100K
Engagement, %1.29%ce compte1.52%médiane pour 10K–100K
IndicateurCe compteMédiane pour 10K–100KRapport
Vues médianes par post2 6789242.90×
Portée (vues ÷ abonnés)10.40%3.62%2.87×
Taux d'engagement1.29%1.52%0.85×

Autres comptes de cette tranche →   Comparer avec un autre compte →   Comment ces repères sont établis →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

23.8K19 Sep
60.6K20 Sep
46.4K
63.2K
40.6K
11.7K
937.9K11 Mar
45.6K27 Aug
2.7K28 Aug
1.2K
1.6K30 Aug
515.8K21 Sep
18.3K
1.1K

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

2.27%19 Sep
0.61%20 Sep
0.97%
0.96%
2.77%
1.24%
0.29%11 Mar
1.29%27 Aug
0.45%28 Aug
0.78%
1.34%30 Aug
1.23%21 Sep
2.64%
18.61%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes60.6%16 008 in total
Reposts18.5%4 894 in total
Replies8.8%2 311 in total
Quotes5.2%1 380 in total
Bookmarks6.9%1 816 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Comptes similaires