tweetindex
FR

Prof. Krishnamurthy V Subramanian ✓

@SubramanianKri · Hyderabad, India · joined 03 Jan 2017

Professor @ISBedu, 17th Chief Economic Adviser, Ex ED @IMFNews, Distinguished Alumnus @IITKanpur @IIM_Calcutta @UChicago. Views are personal + RT≠Endorsement.

70 628Followers
254Following
9 875Posts total
526.7KViews on collected posts

Derniers posts

𝗧𝗵𝗲 “𝟮.𝟲% 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘄𝘁𝗵” 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺 𝗶𝘀 𝗯𝗼𝗴𝘂𝘀. 𝗜𝘁 𝗳𝗮𝗶𝗹𝘀 𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗶𝗰 𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗰. Posting the interviews with @ndtv, @ETNOWlive , @CNNnews18 , @NewsX and @TheFederal_News (both English and Hindi) where I have explained why. Links to the videos in the 691 views · 15 likes · 8 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →
Using this comment as a sample to speak to ALL Naysayers about the change in Nominal GDP due to the upgradation to the Double Deflator method, which is the global standard. See here: https://t.co/6qWfDAO5eb Crucially, the revision occurred IN FEB-2026 AND WAS ANNOUNCED PUBLICLY 2.3K views · 46 likes · 17 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
👇See AI Speak on the revision of the Nominal GDP = What I have said consistently since y'day to provide clarity that the 2.6% claim was bogus. 1.6K views · 21 likes · 7 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@SubramanianKri Seriously??? Man Explain why such a huge downward revision. Base year change cant technically reduce the nominal gdp by such a huge margins 2.6K views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
I just did a simple google search about why the last year gdp was revised down and I got this reply by Gemini. https://t.co/p9g8KqsaUt 2.2K views · 3 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
𝗧𝗵𝗲 ₹𝟴𝟲 𝗹𝗮𝗸𝗵 𝗰𝗿𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗼 ₹𝟴𝟬 𝗹𝗮𝗸𝗵 𝗰𝗿𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲: 𝗴𝗲𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘆 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁. The claim that last year’s GDP was “reduced” from ₹86 lakh crore to ₹80 lakh crore now to inflate a 7.8% growth rate is simply wrong. The new GDP 5.9K views · 110 likes · 34 reposts · 11 replies Open on X →
𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗱𝗼 𝗚𝗗𝗣 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗴𝗲𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗲𝗱? 𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝘁 “𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗽𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻”? Today's graphic in the @timesofindia provides an excellent answer. First, National Statistics across the world necessarily use estimates and proxies. Why? https://t.co/vlOPwaPw73 5.2K views · 171 likes · 81 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →
Even accounting for the downward revision in real GDP for the previous year, the average growth over two years is 6.9% + 7.8% = 7.35%, which is certainly far from the "2.6% claim." And relate the facts to understand the veracity of the "2.6% claim." https://t.co/mvwcXeDeAg 6.5K views · 337 likes · 130 reposts · 15 replies Open on X →
https://t.co/S6pvmiNJ9T 3.7K views · 32 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
https://t.co/S6pvmiNJ9T 8.6K views · 46 likes · 11 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@SubramanianKri Thanks for your quick response @SubramanianKri . 11.2K views · 42 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@SubramanianKri Sir: if your analysis is what it is, doesn't it call for a drastic review of the Civil Services (especially IAS) selection, training, and promotion system? How could such individuals make it to the very top and hold such responsible positions if they didn't have t 4.3K views · 46 likes · 11 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
@SubramanianKri Obviously he is lying, just making random allegations as he was removed from Finance department in 2019, so a bitter man. Such revisions are normal, quarterly estimates are revised multiple times over three years span, as are annual estimates revised thrice. 1st 3.7K views · 48 likes · 7 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
𝗧𝗵𝗲 "𝟮.𝟲% 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘄𝘁𝗵 𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲" 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺: a hilarious demonstration of economic ignorance on National TV. 𝗘𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗿 #𝟭: Take a nominal GDP number from the old series and compare it with a nominal GDP number from the new series. Divide one by the other and 279.1K views · 2.3K likes · 887 reposts · 121 replies Open on X →
@SubramanianKri Need your help to decode what this ex finance secretary is saying. Hope I can get your reply back soon. 107.4K views · 18 likes · 1 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
Deeply honoured to receive the University of Chicago Alumni Award for Professional Achievement. Dating back to 1941, this alumni honour has recognised at least 14 Nobel laureates, including Paul Samuelson, Herbert Simon, Gary Becker, Myron Scholes, and Claudia Goldin, and leaders 81.7K views · 278 likes · 31 reposts · 39 replies Open on X →

Face aux comptes de taille comparable

15 posts des 90 derniers jours, à côté de la tranche de 10K–100K abonnés. diffusé à plus de monde que les comptes de taille comparable.

Vues médianes4 318ce compte924médiane pour 10K–100K
Portée, %6.11%ce compte3.62%médiane pour 10K–100K
Engagement, %1.44%ce compte1.52%médiane pour 10K–100K
IndicateurCe compteMédiane pour 10K–100KRapport
Vues médianes par post4 3189244.67×
Portée (vues ÷ abonnés)6.11%3.62%1.69×
Taux d'engagement1.44%1.52%0.94×

Autres comptes de cette tranche →   Comparer avec un autre compte →   Comment ces repères sont établis →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

279.1K2 Sep
3.7K
4.3K
11.2K
8.6K
3.7K
6.5K
5.2K3 Sep
5.9K
2.2K
2.6K
1.6K
2.3K
6914 Sep

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.21%2 Sep
1.50%
1.44%
0.38%
0.66%
0.94%
7.51%
5.07%3 Sep
2.67%
0.32%
0.08%
1.77%
2.94%
4.34%4 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes62.6%3 473 in total
Reposts22.2%1 229 in total
Replies3.9%217 in total
Quotes2.3%125 in total
Bookmarks9.1%502 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Comptes similaires