Prof. Krishnamurthy V Subramanian ✓

@SubramanianKri · Hyderabad, India · joined 03 Jan 2017

Professor @ISBedu, 17th Chief Economic Adviser, Ex ED @IMFNews, Distinguished Alumnus @IITKanpur @IIM_Calcutta @UChicago. Views are personal + RT≠Endorsement.

70 456Followers

254Following

9 820Posts total

591.9KViews on collected posts

Against accounts of the same size

7 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. shown far beyond its own audience, and the audience reacts.

Median views8 632this account2 896median for 10K–100K

Reach, %12.25%this account9.51%median for 10K–100K

Engagement, %2.54%this account1.56%median for 10K–100K

Metric	This account	Median for 10K–100K	Ratio
Median views per post	8 632	2 896	2.98×
Reach (views ÷ followers)	12.25%	9.51%	1.29×
Engagement rate	2.54%	1.56%	1.63×

Others in this range → Compare with another account → How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

80K1 May

198.7K2 Sep

170.3K

118.8K

8.6K

3.7K

6.5K

5.2K3 Sep

Last 8 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.44%1 May

2.54%2 Sep

1.81%

3.19%

0.66%

0.94%

7.51%

5.07%3 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.56%.

What the audience does

Likes72.9%9 729 in total

Reposts19.2%2 558 in total

Replies4.9%654 in total

Quotes1.4%191 in total

Bookmarks1.6%220 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Latest posts

𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗱𝗼 𝗚𝗗𝗣 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗴𝗲𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗲𝗱? 𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝘁 “𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗽𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻”? Today's graphic in the @timesofindia provides an excellent answer. First, National Statistics across the world necessarily use estimates and proxies. Why? https://t.co/vlOPwaPw73 5.2K views · 171 likes · 81 reposts · 10 replies 03 Sep 2026 Even accounting for the downward revision in real GDP for the previous year, the average growth over two years is 6.9% + 7.8% = 7.35%, which is certainly far from the "2.6% claim." And relate the facts to understand the veracity of the "2.6% claim." https://t.co/mvwcXeDeAg 6.5K views · 337 likes · 130 reposts · 15 replies 02 Sep 2026 https://t.co/S6pvmiNJ9T 3.7K views · 32 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies 02 Sep 2026 https://t.co/S6pvmiNJ9T 8.6K views · 46 likes · 11 reposts · 0 replies 02 Sep 2026 This man here has a passion for speaking a lot and making no sense. 465 words of bluster and deflection - without addressing Subhash Chandra Garg’s basic claim. Let’s make this simple. GDP growth is indeed 7.8% if you compare the revised Q1 figure of roughly ₹80 lakh crore http 118.8K views · 2.8K likes · 725 reposts · 233 replies 02 Sep 2026 𝗧𝗵𝗲 "𝟮.𝟲% 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘄𝘁𝗵 𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲" 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺: a hilarious demonstration of economic ignorance on National TV. 𝗘𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗿 #𝟭: Take a nominal GDP number from the old series and compare it with a nominal GDP number from the new series. Divide one by the other and 170.3K views · 2.1K likes · 800 reposts · 113 replies 02 Sep 2026 I am surprised to see how much Subhash Garg former Finance Secretary was belittled by an anchor who did not have the gravitas to understand what he was saying - repeatedly. If he is wrong his argument needed to be met with an equally strong rebuttal from someone with domain 198.7K views · 4K likes · 777 reposts · 244 replies 02 Sep 2026 Deeply honoured to receive the University of Chicago Alumni Award for Professional Achievement. Dating back to 1941, this alumni honour has recognised at least 14 Nobel laureates, including Paul Samuelson, Herbert Simon, Gary Becker, Myron Scholes, and Claudia Goldin, and leaders 80K views · 275 likes · 31 reposts · 39 replies 01 May 2026