filbfilb ✓
@filbfilb · joined 26 Dec 2012
83 426Followers
1 592Following
16 320Posts total
134.8KViews on collected posts
Derniers posts
Recherche de nouveaux posts…
Everything absolutely ripping up today
Love to see it.
It’s clear in my mind that if I’m long risk and I’m wrong then the outcome is probably total global doom where my portfolio is potentially completely useless.
The whole situation is an asymmetric bet.
7.3K views · 73 likes
· 1 reposts · 8 replies
Open on X →
I can’t seem to find a way to buy TA-35 index… any suggestions?
5.3K views · 8 likes
· 0 reposts · 4 replies
Open on X →
I hate that feeling when when you realise that the person you are speaking to is a NPC.
7K views · 65 likes
· 1 reposts · 7 replies
Open on X →
I like how AI retains the human quality of constantly needing to be told to go away and do it properly after discovering that it has been a bit lazy when completing the task.
5.8K views · 27 likes
· 0 reposts · 4 replies
Open on X →
@filbfilb Nice analysis and approaching it from an interesting angle brother.
2.9K views · 14 likes
· 0 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
You can access the modelled prices on Tradingview.
I welcome any questions, comments or improvements on the equivocal valuation models.
https://t.co/TvbsKy45Di
4.8K views · 43 likes
· 0 reposts · 6 replies
Open on X →
What does all of this say about ZEC at ~$1,275?
I don't think ZEC looks cheap on current network activity alone.
🟠 Historical equivalent-stage transactions: ~$254
🟡 Contemporary transaction comparison: ~$944
Even after allowing for privacy-adjusted economic transfer, the http
5.2K views · 27 likes
· 1 reposts · 3 replies
Open on X →
10
So what did I learn?
“ZEC has the same number of coins BTC once had” is not a valuation model.
It's simply a useful way to identify a comparable stage in Bitcoin's monetary issuance.
From there:
🟠 $254 — Historical BTC market cap × equivalent-stage transaction progress
4.2K views · 32 likes
· 2 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
8/
A significant proportion of ZEC transactions are shielded.
Their transferred values are deliberately hidden.
Treating that hidden economic activity as zero would systematically understate ZEC's transfer value.
So rather than pretending I can observe it, I make the
4.3K views · 19 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
9/ Now we can improve the Green convergence model. ⚪
Instead of measuring equivalent-stage network progress using transaction count alone, blend:
50% × 3.71% transaction share
50% × 12.34% privacy-adjusted transfer-value share
=
8.03% blended equivalent-stage network https:/
4.3K views · 19 likes
· 1 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
6/ Important:
$3,457 is NOT my ZEC fair-value estimate or price target.
The green model asks a conditional question:
If today's BTC network value represents the eventual destination, how much of that destination has ZEC earned based on equivalent-stage transaction progress?
4.7K views · 18 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
7
But Orange, Yellow and Green all share one major weakness:
They measure network activity using transaction count.
A $10 transaction and a $10m transaction both count as one.
Transaction count measures frequency.
It doesn't necessarily measure economic weight.
So I added a
4.5K views · 18 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
5/ Now for the question I'm actually most interested in:
What if today's Bitcoin network value is a potential future destination?
Keep the equivalent-stage comparison from the orange model:
ZEC has reached ~3.71% of BTC's transaction activity at the same issuance stage.
But h
5K views · 16 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
4/ Now change the question.
Instead of comparing ZEC today with BTC at the matched historical issuance stage, compare both networks today.
ZEC currently has ~1.01% of BTC's transaction count.
Apply that to BTC's current market cap, then divide across ZEC supply:
≈ $944/ZEC ht
5.2K views · 19 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
3/ First, the strict historical comparison. 🟠
Take Bitcoin's market cap when BTC had the same circulating supply ZEC has today.
But don't simply give ZEC that valuation.
Adjust it for relative network activity.
At the matched issuance stage:
ZEC 30D tx / BTC 30D tx ≈ 3.71% h
5.9K views · 28 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
2/ The objective:
Value ZEC through the lens of Bitcoin, while accounting for how developed the respective networks actually are.
I start by matching issuance.
ZEC today: ~16.93m coins.
Then find the point in Bitcoin's history when ~16.93m BTC also existed.
That gives us a h
6.3K views · 23 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
1/10
I keep seeing zcash:native compared with early bitcoin:native because both have a 21m cap and ZEC now has roughly the number of coins Bitcoin once had.
There's something interesting in that comparison.
But:
Same supply ≠ same network ≠ same value.
So I built a model
51.4K views · 278 likes
· 21 reposts · 28 replies
Open on X →
Face aux comptes de taille comparable
20 posts des 90 derniers jours, à côté de la tranche de 10K–100K abonnés. diffusé largement, mais peu de ces spectateurs réagissent.
Vues médianes4 858ce compte952médiane pour 10K–100K
Portée, %5.82%ce compte3.50%médiane pour 10K–100K
Engagement, %0.54%ce compte1.56%médiane pour 10K–100K
| Indicateur | Ce compte | Médiane pour 10K–100K | Rapport |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vues médianes par post | 4 858 | 952 | 5.10× |
| Portée (vues ÷ abonnés) | 5.82% | 3.50% | 1.66× |
| Taux d'engagement | 0.54% | 1.56% | 0.35× |
Autres comptes de cette tranche → Comparer avec un autre compte → Comment ces repères sont établis →
Growth & engagement
How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.
Views per post
4.7K9 Sep
4.3K
4.3K
4.2K
5.2K
4.8K
2.9K
5.8K11 Sep
7K12 Sep
5.3K16 Sep
7.3K17 Sep
434
115
7118 Sep
Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.
Engagement rate per post
0.41%9 Sep
0.51%
0.46%
0.84%
0.59%
1.03%
0.55%
0.54%11 Sep
1.05%12 Sep
0.23%16 Sep
1.12%17 Sep
2.07%
1.74%
2.82%18 Sep
Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.56%.
What the audience does
Likes69.8%739 in total
Reposts2.5%27 in total
Replies6.9%73 in total
Quotes0.4%4 in total
Bookmarks20.4%216 in total
Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.
The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.
Comptes similaires
Happy Dog ✓
@thehappydog_
166.8K followers
· 5.6K posts
LADE BACKK ✓
@LadeBackk
166.8K followers
· 72.6K posts
Wayne Liang ✓
@wliang
166.8K followers
· 3.6K posts
Jemimah Rodrigues
@JemiRodrigues
166.8K followers
· 1.1K posts
Stake.US ✓
@StakeUsa
166.8K followers
· 11.9K posts
Fenelon MASSALA ✓
@rfemassala
166.8K followers
· 32.1K posts
Canada Business
@canadabusiness
166.8K followers
· 14.1K posts
michal.rachon ✓
@michalrachon
166.8K followers
· 49.7K posts