Stuart Phillips (he/him) ✓

@mackinprof · Hamilton, Ontario · joined 12 Mar 2009

Distinguished Univ Professor, tier 1 @CRC_CRC, @McMasterU; opinions mine. https://t.co/9FZmrkm1K4. https://t.co/6w6NWxajVX recovering biohacker

58 268Followers

4 672Following

44 401Posts total

37.9KViews on collected posts

Derniers posts

Stuart Phillips (he/him) ✓@mackinprof22 Sep

Protein and the 2025–2030 Dietary Guidelines for Americans: The Right Number… But the Right Process? https://t.co/1W2UZlCKns 3.1K views · 29 likes · 6 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Stuart Phillips (he/him) ✓@mackinprof22 Sep

More teenage boys are using creatine. Here’s what pediatricians tell their patients https://t.co/k9UpmMaTeH 5.2K views · 36 likes · 9 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Stuart Phillips (he/him) ✓@mackinprof20 Sep

@mackinprof Thank you Profesor Stuart for a great and educational post . I definitely will stay tuned. 70 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Stuart Phillips (he/him) ✓@mackinprof20 Sep

@jpapi7 @reallyoptimized actual data analysis - great theories, poor data. Mice are not small humans. 776 views · 7 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Stuart Phillips (he/him) ✓@mackinprof20 Sep

Stay tuned for more data.... 844 views · 8 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Stuart Phillips (he/him) ✓@mackinprof20 Sep

4/4 Around 1.2–1.6 g/kg/day supports muscle and function, especially after 50 and alongside resistance training. Uncertainty remains. “Higher protein shortens your life” is a hypothesis to test, not a fact to teach. 768 views · 21 likes · 2 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Stuart Phillips (he/him) ✓@mackinprof20 Sep

2/4 A meta-analysis of 715,128 people linked higher total protein with lower mortality. Our reanalysis of the NHANES III dataset behind a widely cited harm claim reached essentially opposite conclusions. https://t.co/xAJxkFnGUB 1.4K views · 25 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Stuart Phillips (he/him) ✓@mackinprof20 Sep

3/4 Nutrient-sensing biology matters. But lifespan gains in yeast, worms and rodents do not establish that higher protein shortens human life. Human evidence also links higher intake with less frailty and better-preserved function. 1.4K views · 23 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Stuart Phillips (he/him) ✓@mackinprof20 Sep

1/4 “Higher protein shortens your life.” Sticky claim. Thin human evidence. Our search deliberately looked for harm. Most findings were null, tied to food sources or substitutions, or favoured higher intake. Protein intake is not the same as dietary pattern. 9.4K views · 109 likes · 15 reposts · 8 replies Open on X →

Stuart Phillips (he/him) ✓@mackinprof13 Sep

@mackinprof Dr Fung fallen a long way from respected Intermittent Fasting advocate to pro Keto and now outright statin denier. Sad 164 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Stuart Phillips (he/him) ✓@mackinprof13 Sep

@mackinprof It’s absolutely scaring to see so many MD’s unable to critically appreciate research results. 261 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Stuart Phillips (he/him) ✓@mackinprof13 Sep

@mackinprof Yes, they were randomized to screening. We can all read. That resulted in substantially more statin use, with no significant difference in MACE or mortality. And now we're apparently using "trended toward benefit” as evidence too? 373 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Stuart Phillips (he/him) ✓@mackinprof12 Sep

Read the trial. Nobody was randomized to statins; they were randomized to a screening invitation (37% never showed). Statin-naive men trended toward benefit, baseline statin users got none. The harm was aspirin bleeding. This debunks liberal aspirin use, not statins. https://t.co

11.5K views · 117 likes · 11 reposts · 15 replies Open on X →

Stuart Phillips (he/him) ✓@mackinprof12 Sep

Bend the knee and kiss the ring... not here 🇨🇦 2.7K views · 17 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Face aux comptes de taille comparable

14 posts des 90 derniers jours, à côté de la tranche de 10K–100K abonnés. touche moins de monde que les comptes de taille comparable.

Vues médianes1 120ce compte924médiane pour 10K–100K

Portée, %1.92%ce compte3.62%médiane pour 10K–100K

Engagement, %1.39%ce compte1.52%médiane pour 10K–100K

Indicateur	Ce compte	Médiane pour 10K–100K	Rapport
Vues médianes par post	1 120	924	1.21×
Portée (vues ÷ abonnés)	1.92%	3.62%	0.53×
Taux d'engagement	1.39%	1.52%	0.91×

Autres comptes de cette tranche → Comparer avec un autre compte → Comment ces repères sont établis →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

2.7K12 Sep

11.5K

37313 Sep

261

164

9.4K20 Sep

1.4K

768

844

776

5.2K22 Sep

3.1K

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.75%12 Sep

1.25%

1.34%13 Sep

1.53%

2.44%

1.43%20 Sep

1.74%

1.93%

3.26%

1.18%

1.29%

2.86%

0.94%22 Sep

1.20%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes69.8%405 in total

Reposts7.9%46 in total

Replies6.9%40 in total

Quotes0.9%5 in total

Bookmarks14.5%84 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Derniers posts

Face aux comptes de taille comparable

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Comptes similaires