tweetindex
FR

Snyk

@snyksec · 🌍 Global · joined 12 May 2015

Trust AI at full speed with Snyk. System status: https://t.co/tsOiR7QK9Q

21 159Followers
771Following
13 185Posts total
11.4KViews on collected posts

Derniers posts

@snyksec @ezratanzer This is the cleanest way I have seen anyone say it. An instruction changes what the agent tries. It does not decide what it is allowed to do. I keep coming back to the same split. Capability is not authority. One lives in the prompt. The other has to live o 5 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Snyk is in the right place at the right time as the market shifts rapidly to agentic AI security. Evo by Snyk has sustained 81.5% month-over-month customer growth since its first capability reached general availability in March. The number that says even more is the 76% of https
Graph showing new issues increase across six quarters with text about AI risk and security.
580 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@snyksec @ezratanzer “Write secure code” has the same enforcement mechanism as “please don’t break production.” 2 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Anthropic's own threat intelligence report, published last week, describes an attacker whose malware got caught by security tools — then had it rewritten and redeployed by its own AI agents until it evaded detection again. In hours, not weeks. AI has changed the attack https://t
Webinar titled 'Autonomous attacks are here. Are you prepared?' with images of two speakers.
683 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@snyksec @ezratanzer That’s the key distinction: instructions shape generation, but enforcement has to happen outside the model. I’d make the four controls independently observable—pre-commit checks, sandboxed execution, dependency policy, and runtime monitoring—so one green ligh 3 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Ask an agent to "write secure code" and it will try. But an instruction isn't a constraint. It shifts what gets written, it doesn't decide it 🔏 Read @EzraTanzer's piece on why prevention for agent-generated code isn't one control. It's four, and each one only works at a https://
Dark gradient background with text 'build an application fast, stay secure'
748 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
Most security programs weren't built for an attacker that moves at machine speed, and next week is when that gap gets put on the table. Next week, @TheRegister's James Hayes talks with Snyk's Manoj Nair and @AnthropicAI's Alon Krifcher about the gap most security programs https
Webinar: 'How to prepare for the coming wave of autonomous attacks' with images of two speakers.
630 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@snyksec Hi @snyksec — I own https://t.co/aLqWbyQxMs, a clean brandable domain around security and trust. Thought it might be worth putting on your radar. 3 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@snyksec ca? 19 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
AI is writing code at machine speed. Now, your security can close the gap with the Snyk AI Security Fabric. Learn more about the industry’s first security layer for continuous defense across the entire SLDC here 👉 https://t.co/C5MQ3g8QpA https://t.co/6RKklq6GbQ
0:53
8.7K views · 25 likes · 5 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Face aux comptes de taille comparable

8 posts des 90 derniers jours, à côté de la tranche de 10K–100K abonnés. en dessous de ses pairs à la fois en portée et en engagement.

Vues médianes292ce compte924médiane pour 10K–100K
Portée, %1.38%ce compte3.62%médiane pour 10K–100K
Engagement, %0.34%ce compte1.52%médiane pour 10K–100K
IndicateurCe compteMédiane pour 10K–100KRapport
Vues médianes par post2929240.32×
Portée (vues ÷ abonnés)1.38%3.62%0.38×
Taux d'engagement0.34%1.52%0.23×

Autres comptes de cette tranche →   Comparer avec un autre compte →   Comment ces repères sont établis →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

8.7K3 Feb
1926 Mar
327 Aug
63010 Sep
74815 Sep
3
68316 Sep
217 Sep
580
521 Sep

Last 10 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.41%3 Feb
0.00%26 Mar
0.00%27 Aug
0.79%10 Sep
0.80%15 Sep
0.00%
0.73%16 Sep
0.00%17 Sep
0.69%
0.00%21 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes60.0%39 in total
Reposts7.7%5 in total
Replies13.8%9 in total
Quotes4.6%3 in total
Bookmarks13.8%9 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Comptes similaires