FoiaFan ✓
@15poundstogo · joined 29 Jul 2021
Keeping it private
43 829Followers
613Following
49 133Posts total
992.5KViews on collected posts
Postingan terbaru
Mencari postingan baru…
Normal, good-hearted people discard friends who go ape-sh*t antisemite or overtly hateful racist. I’ve discarded such former friends. I have fond memories of the former friendships and avoid trashing them in public. But I don’t stay friends with crazed haters.
JD Vance just http
1K views · 4 likes
· 2 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
You can’t argue with logic. https://t.co/ti2RsIgBwe
1.5K views · 21 likes
· 3 reposts · 3 replies
Open on X →
The UK is not hypocritical at all.
They want Israel to surrender to jihadists, and their government is busy surrendering to jihadists at home as well.
1.1K views · 21 likes
· 4 reposts · 0 replies
Open on X →
It used to be that antisemites were not allowed in polite company. Perhaps that is still true, but we are facing a severe shortage of polite company.
1.2K views · 32 likes
· 4 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
40/ There is much more to say regarding the FBI’s burying Danchenko behind the veil of CSH status. Durham revealed the CHS thing, but mostly left it at that, charging him only with a limp unsuccessful charge against Danchenko for lying to the FBI. I’ve held off threading it, as I
1.6K views · 16 likes
· 3 reposts · 4 replies
Open on X →
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
Okay. Here’s my big FOIA news. After in excess of FIVE YEARS, the State Department has finally admitted that it can’t find Jonathan Winer’s notes of his meeting with Christopher Steele. Note the five year statute of limitations for most federal crimes. In a https://t.co
270.1K views · 2.3K likes
· 1.1K reposts · 101 replies
Open on X →
38/ Actually, the DNC asked the official I suggested was Wallander about the FBI, not the State Department. But the bottom line is Durham seems to have left it at that. Had it been a Trump national security official communicating with the RNC about such sensitive matters at such
1.7K views · 37 likes
· 7 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
37/ Wallander, btw, was friendly with alt-dossier author Derek Shearer, who had earlier introduced Wallander to Hillary, and Strobe Talbot (who passed a copy of Steele’s dossier to Fiona Hill). But, despite Wallander being cited in an internal campaign email as a source on the ht
8.4K views · 81 likes
· 32 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
36/ And to whom did Hillary’s staff reach out for such tidbits? Celeste Wallander, that’s who. (Aka “Special Assistant to the President and National Security Council member.”) https://t.co/WLZXhWCLLq
9.8K views · 106 likes
· 47 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
35/ One other word on Durham giving the State Department the kid gloves treatment. Durham mentions that on July 5, 2016, Hillary campaign staffers were internally emailing each other about a Franklin Foer’s Trump-Russia hit piece and also that they heard the State Department’s ht
2.2K views · 47 likes
· 15 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
34/ Btw, I have a five (+) year old foia request rotting away at the State Dept for Winer’s and Nuland’s notes on the Steele dossier. I was supposed to get a response over three years ago, but they pushed it off again and again and again. The latest “estimated” response date is
2.1K views · 56 likes
· 15 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
33/ … he may have removed or destroyed them, as he admitted having done with other Steele-related materials. So why didn’t Durham push the issue? If it had Mueller investigating a Trump official, we all know what would have happened.
3.9K views · 46 likes
· 10 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
32/ Durham never saw Winer’s notes. Neither did SSCI, despite deposing him twice. Why not? Probably because…
3K views · 47 likes
· 13 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
31/ The second possible crime that Durham gave Winer a pass on was the destruction of government records. His two page summary of the Steele dossier certainly existed at one time. It is referenced on pp. 62-63 of the Durham report. But …
3.1K views · 64 likes
· 19 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
30/ Lying to Congress. Well, when Winer first testified to SSCI in July of 2017, he wasn’t exactly accurate or forthcoming. In fact, after reading his February 2018 editorial in WAPO, SSCI had to call him back for a second interview to go over some of what he left out or got htt
2.6K views · 64 likes
· 19 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
29/ In addition to the Hatch Act (see post # 24 above), it seems possible, if not probable, that Winer might have committed at least two crimes in connection with Steele and Spygate. Had he been a Republican placed under the microscope by Mueller/Weissmann, he would have been put
3.1K views · 74 likes
· 21 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
28/ In fact, after Hillary left the State Department, Winer became the conduit for sending Steele’s reports on Russia/Ukraine to Toria Nuland and others in the State Department. Nuland “loved” his reports (presumably prepared for his Oligarch clients) and they seem to have https:
2.9K views · 64 likes
· 21 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
27/ With respect to Steele, Winer’s friendly relationship with the guy was kinda creepy. Both represented oligarchs for and against Russia as “consultants.” https://t.co/1UOflYWIXt https://t.co/41psa4frz2
4.4K views · 65 likes
· 21 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
26/ With respect to Blumenthal/Shearer, Winer didn’t tell the State Department. Probably because Hillary had violated the spirit of the president’s orders by using them as outside sources and advisers while she was SOS. But Winer passed the Shearer memo to Steele, who gave it to
3.8K views · 71 likes
· 23 reposts · 3 replies
Open on X →
25/ If there is any government official involved in Spygate that was approached and used more often by Hillary’s apparatchiks than the FBI’s James Baker, it was the State Department’s Jonathan Winer. Here’s a guy that was approached by and passed on bogus Spygate information from
217.3K views · 114 likes
· 36 reposts · 6 replies
Open on X →
24/ On to another subtopic: Durham’s sham minimalist hands-off treatment of the State Department. It’s not like Hillary’s poisoning of the State Department and it’s deep participation in Spygate was any great secret, but Durham gave them a near-complete pass. Why? https://t.co/uZ
10K views · 76 likes
· 26 reposts · 4 replies
Open on X →
23/ A news hook that was supplied by the subject matter of that very email. Look, I’m not saying Baker was definitely a leaker. Maybe he was, may not. But the fact that Durham let him off without even checking his texts or cellphone shows Durham’s investigation was a minimalist h
3.3K views · 76 likes
· 22 reposts · 3 replies
Open on X →
22/ And why was Durham not having previously possessed and examined Baker’s phone and texts WORSE than lame? Because back in 2018, PRIOR to Durham’s broader investigation, Durham was charged with a criminal investigation of leaks, with Baker as a subject/suspect! Durham closed
4.8K views · 80 likes
· 33 reposts · 5 replies
Open on X →
21/ Durham’s forgetfulness regarding the whereabouts of Baker’s phone was lame because (i) Baker was his star witness, and good lawyers always closely investigate their own star witnesses and clients to spot issues and problems, and (ii) Horowitz had previously issued at least ht
8.2K views · 77 likes
· 26 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
20/ Many may remember how, during the Sussmann prosecution, Durham claimed to have learned of a highly incriminating text from Sussmann to Baker. It contained irrefutable written proof that Sussmann had lied to the FBI about the identity of his client - the central subject matter
2.9K views · 67 likes
· 22 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
19/ While at Twitter, Baker followed only few accounts, but these included Spygate villains. Makes one wonder, right?
23.7K views · 158 likes
· 57 reposts · 4 replies
Open on X →
18/ And, as we all know, Baker went on to work as Deputy General Counsel at Twitter a few months before the 2020 election. He was there when the FBI’s politicized censorship crew was pushing Twitter and others to stifle important political speech. Ultimately, Elon Musk canned
4.8K views · 93 likes
· 20 reposts · 6 replies
Open on X →
17/ The next subtopic of this continuing thread is how Durham failed to properly investigate former FBI General Counsel James Baker. Baker was a central figure in Spygate. It was he who Sussmann contacted to push the Alfa Bank hoax. It was he who received the Steele dossier from
8K views · 107 likes
· 38 reposts · 5 replies
Open on X →
@aaronjmate May 16, 2017 and the following day were extremely active in the Page/Strzok texts - with multiple references to James Baker and Deputy Director McCabe. And, of course, Rod R appointed Mueller the next day. This important FBI foia document is part of the same story. An
23.5K views · 375 likes
· 111 reposts · 8 replies
Open on X →
Dibandingkan akun berukuran sama
4 postingan dari 90 hari terakhir, dibandingkan dengan rentang 10K–100K pengikut. menjangkau lebih sedikit orang, tetapi melibatkan mereka jauh lebih kuat.
Median tayangan1 149akun ini924median untuk 10K–100K
Jangkauan, %2.62%akun ini3.62%median untuk 10K–100K
Interaksi, %2.04%akun ini1.52%median untuk 10K–100K
| Metrik | Akun ini | Median untuk 10K–100K | Rasio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median tayangan per postingan | 1 149 | 924 | 1.24× |
| Jangkauan (tayangan ÷ pengikut) | 2.62% | 3.62% | 0.72× |
| Tingkat interaksi | 2.04% | 1.52% | 1.34× |
Akun lain pada rentang ini → Bandingkan dengan akun lain → Bagaimana tolok ukur ini disusun →
Growth & engagement
How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.
Views per post
3K2 May
3.9K
2.1K4 May
2.2K
9.8K
8.4K6 May
1.7K
270.1K20 May
2.8K28 May
1.6K5 Oct
1.2K30 Aug
1.1K31 Aug
1.5K2 Sep
1K3 Sep
Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.
Engagement rate per post
2.09%2 May
1.50%
3.37%4 May
2.94%
1.59%
1.37%6 May
2.74%
1.29%20 May
1.23%28 May
1.48%5 Oct
3.28%30 Aug
2.25%31 Aug
1.84%2 Sep
0.68%3 Sep
Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.
What the audience does
Likes67.8%4 443 in total
Reposts26.5%1 739 in total
Replies2.8%181 in total
Quotes1.0%64 in total
Bookmarks1.9%126 in total
Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.
The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.
Akun serupa
Mr Smeg Zim
@T_a_t_e_n_d_a
87.7K followers
· 618K posts
ENKI ✓
@ENKIProtocol
87.7K followers
· 2K posts
JARS OF CLAY
@jarsofclay
87.6K followers
· 10.3K posts
Mississippi State Men's Basketball ✓
@HailStateMBK
87.6K followers
· 31.9K posts
Selâhattin Aydın ✓
@selahattnaydiin
87.6K followers
· 18.1K posts
MLW ✓
@MLW
87.6K followers
· 2.8K posts
🇸🇦خــــــاااالد🇸🇦 ✓
@khalid88khaa
87.6K followers
· 389.9K posts
jose antonetti
@joseantonetti
87.6K followers
· 58.7K posts