FoiaFan ✓

@15poundstogo · joined 29 Jul 2021

Keeping it private

43 829Followers

613Following

49 133Posts total

992.5KViews on collected posts

Against accounts of the same size

4 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. reaches fewer people than peers, but engages them much harder.

Median views1 149this account2 392median for 10K–100K

Reach, %2.62%this account7.18%median for 10K–100K

Engagement, %2.04%this account1.50%median for 10K–100K

Metric	This account	Median for 10K–100K	Ratio
Median views per post	1 149	2 392	0.48×
Reach (views ÷ followers)	2.62%	7.18%	0.37×
Engagement rate	2.04%	1.50%	1.36×

Others in this range → Compare with another account → How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

3K2 May

3.9K

2.1K4 May

2.2K

9.8K

8.4K6 May

1.7K

270.1K20 May

2.8K28 May

1.6K5 Oct

1.2K30 Aug

1.1K31 Aug

1.5K2 Sep

1K3 Sep

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

2.09%2 May

1.50%

3.37%4 May

2.94%

1.59%

1.37%6 May

2.74%

1.29%20 May

1.23%28 May

1.48%5 Oct

3.28%30 Aug

2.25%31 Aug

1.84%2 Sep

0.68%3 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.50%.

What the audience does

Likes67.8%4 443 in total

Reposts26.5%1 739 in total

Replies2.8%181 in total

Quotes1.0%64 in total

Bookmarks1.9%126 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Latest posts

Normal, good-hearted people discard friends who go ape-sh*t antisemite or overtly hateful racist. I’ve discarded such former friends. I have fond memories of the former friendships and avoid trashing them in public. But I don’t stay friends with crazed haters. JD Vance just http 1K views · 4 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies 03 Sep 2026 You can’t argue with logic. https://t.co/ti2RsIgBwe 1.5K views · 21 likes · 3 reposts · 3 replies 02 Sep 2026 The UK is not hypocritical at all. They want Israel to surrender to jihadists, and their government is busy surrendering to jihadists at home as well. 1.1K views · 21 likes · 4 reposts · 0 replies 31 Aug 2026 It used to be that antisemites were not allowed in polite company. Perhaps that is still true, but we are facing a severe shortage of polite company. 1.2K views · 32 likes · 4 reposts · 2 replies 30 Aug 2026 40/ There is much more to say regarding the FBI’s burying Danchenko behind the veil of CSH status. Durham revealed the CHS thing, but mostly left it at that, charging him only with a limp unsuccessful charge against Danchenko for lying to the FBI. I’ve held off threading it, as I 1.6K views · 16 likes · 3 reposts · 4 replies 05 Oct 2025 39/ PS, on the subject of Winer. 2.8K views · 26 likes · 4 reposts · 4 replies 28 May 2025 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 Okay. Here’s my big FOIA news. After in excess of FIVE YEARS, the State Department has finally admitted that it can’t find Jonathan Winer’s notes of his meeting with Christopher Steele. Note the five year statute of limitations for most federal crimes. In a https://t.co 270.1K views · 2.3K likes · 1.1K reposts · 101 replies 20 May 2025 38/ Actually, the DNC asked the official I suggested was Wallander about the FBI, not the State Department. But the bottom line is Durham seems to have left it at that. Had it been a Trump national security official communicating with the RNC about such sensitive matters at such 1.7K views · 37 likes · 7 reposts · 2 replies 06 May 2025 37/ Wallander, btw, was friendly with alt-dossier author Derek Shearer, who had earlier introduced Wallander to Hillary, and Strobe Talbot (who passed a copy of Steele’s dossier to Fiona Hill). But, despite Wallander being cited in an internal campaign email as a source on the ht 8.4K views · 81 likes · 32 reposts · 2 replies 06 May 2025 36/ And to whom did Hillary’s staff reach out for such tidbits? Celeste Wallander, that’s who. (Aka “Special Assistant to the President and National Security Council member.”) https://t.co/WLZXhWCLLq 9.8K views · 106 likes · 47 reposts · 2 replies 04 May 2025 35/ One other word on Durham giving the State Department the kid gloves treatment. Durham mentions that on July 5, 2016, Hillary campaign staffers were internally emailing each other about a Franklin Foer’s Trump-Russia hit piece and also that they heard the State Department’s ht 2.2K views · 47 likes · 15 reposts · 2 replies 04 May 2025 34/ Btw, I have a five (+) year old foia request rotting away at the State Dept for Winer’s and Nuland’s notes on the Steele dossier. I was supposed to get a response over three years ago, but they pushed it off again and again and again. The latest “estimated” response date is 2.1K views · 56 likes · 15 reposts · 1 replies 04 May 2025 33/ … he may have removed or destroyed them, as he admitted having done with other Steele-related materials. So why didn’t Durham push the issue? If it had Mueller investigating a Trump official, we all know what would have happened. 3.9K views · 46 likes · 10 reposts · 2 replies 02 May 2025 32/ Durham never saw Winer’s notes. Neither did SSCI, despite deposing him twice. Why not? Probably because… 3K views · 47 likes · 13 reposts · 2 replies 02 May 2025 31/ The second possible crime that Durham gave Winer a pass on was the destruction of government records. His two page summary of the Steele dossier certainly existed at one time. It is referenced on pp. 62-63 of the Durham report. But … 3.1K views · 64 likes · 19 reposts · 1 replies 01 May 2025 30/ Lying to Congress. Well, when Winer first testified to SSCI in July of 2017, he wasn’t exactly accurate or forthcoming. In fact, after reading his February 2018 editorial in WAPO, SSCI had to call him back for a second interview to go over some of what he left out or got htt 2.6K views · 64 likes · 19 reposts · 1 replies 01 Apr 2025 29/ In addition to the Hatch Act (see post # 24 above), it seems possible, if not probable, that Winer might have committed at least two crimes in connection with Steele and Spygate. Had he been a Republican placed under the microscope by Mueller/Weissmann, he would have been put 3.1K views · 74 likes · 21 reposts · 2 replies 12 Jan 2025 28/ In fact, after Hillary left the State Department, Winer became the conduit for sending Steele’s reports on Russia/Ukraine to Toria Nuland and others in the State Department. Nuland “loved” his reports (presumably prepared for his Oligarch clients) and they seem to have https: 2.9K views · 64 likes · 21 reposts · 1 replies 12 Jan 2025 27/ With respect to Steele, Winer’s friendly relationship with the guy was kinda creepy. Both represented oligarchs for and against Russia as “consultants.” https://t.co/1UOflYWIXt https://t.co/41psa4frz2 4.4K views · 65 likes · 21 reposts · 1 replies 12 Jan 2025 26/ With respect to Blumenthal/Shearer, Winer didn’t tell the State Department. Probably because Hillary had violated the spirit of the president’s orders by using them as outside sources and advisers while she was SOS. But Winer passed the Shearer memo to Steele, who gave it to 3.8K views · 71 likes · 23 reposts · 3 replies 12 Jan 2025 25/ If there is any government official involved in Spygate that was approached and used more often by Hillary’s apparatchiks than the FBI’s James Baker, it was the State Department’s Jonathan Winer. Here’s a guy that was approached by and passed on bogus Spygate information from 217.3K views · 114 likes · 36 reposts · 6 replies 11 Jan 2025 24/ On to another subtopic: Durham’s sham minimalist hands-off treatment of the State Department. It’s not like Hillary’s poisoning of the State Department and it’s deep participation in Spygate was any great secret, but Durham gave them a near-complete pass. Why? https://t.co/uZ 10K views · 76 likes · 26 reposts · 4 replies 11 Jan 2025 23/ A news hook that was supplied by the subject matter of that very email. Look, I’m not saying Baker was definitely a leaker. Maybe he was, may not. But the fact that Durham let him off without even checking his texts or cellphone shows Durham’s investigation was a minimalist h 3.3K views · 76 likes · 22 reposts · 3 replies 04 Jan 2025 22/ And why was Durham not having previously possessed and examined Baker’s phone and texts WORSE than lame? Because back in 2018, PRIOR to Durham’s broader investigation, Durham was charged with a criminal investigation of leaks, with Baker as a subject/suspect! Durham closed 4.8K views · 80 likes · 33 reposts · 5 replies 04 Jan 2025 21/ Durham’s forgetfulness regarding the whereabouts of Baker’s phone was lame because (i) Baker was his star witness, and good lawyers always closely investigate their own star witnesses and clients to spot issues and problems, and (ii) Horowitz had previously issued at least ht 8.2K views · 77 likes · 26 reposts · 2 replies 03 Jan 2025 20/ Many may remember how, during the Sussmann prosecution, Durham claimed to have learned of a highly incriminating text from Sussmann to Baker. It contained irrefutable written proof that Sussmann had lied to the FBI about the identity of his client - the central subject matter 2.9K views · 67 likes · 22 reposts · 1 replies 03 Jan 2025 19/ While at Twitter, Baker followed only few accounts, but these included Spygate villains. Makes one wonder, right? 23.7K views · 158 likes · 57 reposts · 4 replies 02 Jan 2025 18/ And, as we all know, Baker went on to work as Deputy General Counsel at Twitter a few months before the 2020 election. He was there when the FBI’s politicized censorship crew was pushing Twitter and others to stifle important political speech. Ultimately, Elon Musk canned 4.8K views · 93 likes · 20 reposts · 6 replies 02 Jan 2025 17/ The next subtopic of this continuing thread is how Durham failed to properly investigate former FBI General Counsel James Baker. Baker was a central figure in Spygate. It was he who Sussmann contacted to push the Alfa Bank hoax. It was he who received the Steele dossier from 8K views · 107 likes · 38 reposts · 5 replies 02 Jan 2025 @aaronjmate May 16, 2017 and the following day were extremely active in the Page/Strzok texts - with multiple references to James Baker and Deputy Director McCabe. And, of course, Rod R appointed Mueller the next day. This important FBI foia document is part of the same story. An 23.5K views · 375 likes · 111 reposts · 8 replies 31 Dec 2024