tweetindex
ID

Rebecca Rettig ✓

@RebeccaRettig1 · joined 24 Mar 2019

ops+legal @jito_labs. BOD @fund_defi & @TXStockExchange. tweets ≠ advice. lawyer ≠ yours. opinions = mine. rarely tweet; doing the work.

16 575Followers
4 921Following
3 915Posts total
172.5KViews on collected posts

Postingan terbaru

1/ Know its an oxymoron to have "fun" & "compliance" in the same sentence, but this convo w @ARedbord on #TRMTalks on compliance *was* fun. @m_mosier_ & I chatted about many things (Zen Buddhism!), incl our new paper w @malekanoms (link to paper below). Listen on Spotify 🎧 https:
1.7K views · 26 likes · 5 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
After nearly a decade in crypto law, I am confident in saying we have learned lessons (too many to count!) that are critical for lawyers entering the AI space to keep top of mind. I set out 3 of them in @Law360: https://t.co/sruiEeMRAq (DM me for a full copy beyond the paywall) h
8.2K views · 84 likes · 8 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →
@RebeccaRettig1 @m_mosier_ @malekanoms Yes, the privacy section matters a lot. Regulators and auditors need access to the right evidence, but the entire market doesn’t need the same view. That’s the approach we’ve taken at Dusk. Consensus remains permissionless, while financial 106 views · 10 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
9/ We’re grateful to those who reviewed the paper & provided thoughtful feedback: @DanAwrey, @ccatalini, @jchervinsky, @sh0edog, @jillgun, @milesjennings, @MicheleKorver, @JaiMassari, @libraticlex, @bonnie_wynand, @amandatums, @retroszv, @millercwl & @pmwnyc. 🙏 689 views · 31 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
7/ Attenuated, protocol-mediated contacts at the network layer — a validator selected by code, a fee set by protocol — are not the dealings these laws police. FinCEN & OFAC enforce against systemic, knowable failures, not good-faith participation on neutral infrastructure. 589 views · 21 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
8/ And institutions are already here: regulators have confirmed banks may run nodes, validate transactions & pay network fees, & major asset managers operate on permissionless networks today. The reward: resilience, interoperability, open competition & deeper liquidity. 621 views · 22 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
6/ The paper’s core thesis: financial institutions can use permissionless networks; concerns about financial integrity laws should not deter them & can be addressed under existing law through a risk-based compliance frameworks that place controls at the app layer. 642 views · 24 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
5/ Nearly two decades after Bitcoin launched, openness remains the defining feature of public blockchains. Distributed data, cryptography & consensus all predate them. The novel contribution is permissionlessness: shared infrastructure open to incumbents & new entrants alike. 857 views · 23 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
3/ This isn’t a new choice. A generation ago, institutions confronted an open, global, permissionless network anyone could join: the internet. They moved their businesses onto its open protocols & built controls at the application layer, around their customers & conduct. 1.3K views · 26 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
4/ That decision now appears so plainly correct that its contested origins are easy to forget. Financial institutions face the same decision again with permissionless blockchains — & it is just as clear: use is compatible with existing law & the benefits far outweigh the risks. 871 views · 22 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
2/ Institutions raise the same objections: network-layer exposure to illicit actors, asset provenance, onchain confidentiality. We answer each & set out a 9-point risk-management framework placing compliance controls at the app layer — the layer where institutions operate. 👇 http
17.8K views · 43 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
1/ Today, @m_mosier_ @malekanoms & I are sharing a new paper: "The Compatibility of Financial Integrity With Permissionless Networks". Institutions say BSA & sanctions laws prevent use of these networks. We debunk this & provide a path forward. 🧵 https://t.co/8KAQH6UyDV 57.6K views · 213 likes · 41 reposts · 21 replies Open on X →
https://t.co/2e0PEdl2v5 14.6K views · 69 likes · 11 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
@RebeccaRettig1 @jito_sol Facts https://t.co/P3wOkWcazb
607 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
4/ I hope that this report sets a standard for how projects can engage with the market to build a more credible, trusted, and transparent system, and welcome open dialogue from the community on these issues. 1.2K views · 17 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
5/ Extremely grateful to the unprecedented and talented legal minds that contributed to this report, and appreciative of the ability to work collaboratively with the administration & its regulators to move the industry forward. 1.1K views · 19 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
2/ The report analyzes why JitoSOL does not constitute an “investment contract” under the Howey test and, in the event the Reves test applies (which policy would dictate it should not), also does not constitute the type of “note” that is a security. 1.4K views · 21 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
3/ There's been an unprecedented amount of public discourse on the topic of how the securities laws apply to crypto arrangements & assets. Proud for the @jito_sol Foundation to contribute to the discussion & to provide full disclosure and analyses openly. 1K views · 17 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
1/ As a crypto lawyer, I’ve craved a regulatory environment that welcomes disclosure & transparency -- core tenets of consumer protection & the crypto ethos. Today the @jito_sol Fnd published a report taking these tenets head on in re JitoSOL, an LST. https://t.co/2MSP8wj33D ht
61.7K views · 542 likes · 38 reposts · 265 replies Open on X →

Dibandingkan akun berukuran sama

13 postingan dari 90 hari terakhir, dibandingkan dengan rentang 10K–100K pengikut. tampil jauh melampaui audiensnya sendiri, dan audiens itu merespons.

Median tayangan871akun ini924median untuk 10K–100K
Jangkauan, %5.25%akun ini3.62%median untuk 10K–100K
Interaksi, %2.64%akun ini1.52%median untuk 10K–100K
MetrikAkun iniMedian untuk 10K–100KRasio
Median tayangan per postingan8719240.94×
Jangkauan (tayangan ÷ pengikut)5.25%3.62%1.45×
Tingkat interaksi2.64%1.52%1.74×

Akun lain pada rentang ini →   Bandingkan dengan akun lain →   Bagaimana tolok ukur ini disusun →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

60718 Mar
14.6K7 Aug
57.6K24 Aug
17.8K
871
1.3K
857
642
621
589
689
10627 Aug
8.2K3 Sep
1.7K9 Sep

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.99%18 Mar
0.58%7 Aug
0.48%24 Aug
0.26%
2.64%
2.22%
2.92%
3.89%
3.70%
3.74%
4.50%
11.32%27 Aug
1.24%3 Sep
2.11%9 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes65.9%1 235 in total
Reposts5.8%108 in total
Replies17.2%323 in total
Bookmarks11.1%208 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

Followers by day

10 Sep

Daily snapshots since 10 Sep 2026; the dashed line is the starting count.

Akun serupa