Rebecca Rettig ✓
@RebeccaRettig1 · joined 24 Mar 2019
ops+legal @jito_labs. BOD @fund_defi & @TXStockExchange. tweets ≠ advice. lawyer ≠ yours. opinions = mine. rarely tweet; doing the work.
16 575Followers
4 921Following
3 915Posts total
172.5KViews on collected posts
โพสต์ล่าสุด
กำลังค้นหาโพสต์ใหม่…
1/ Know its an oxymoron to have "fun" & "compliance" in the same sentence, but this convo w @ARedbord on #TRMTalks on compliance *was* fun. @m_mosier_ & I chatted about many things (Zen Buddhism!), incl our new paper w @malekanoms (link to paper below). Listen on Spotify 🎧 https:
1.7K views · 26 likes
· 5 reposts · 4 replies
Open on X →
After nearly a decade in crypto law, I am confident in saying we have learned lessons (too many to count!) that are critical for lawyers entering the AI space to keep top of mind. I set out 3 of them in @Law360: https://t.co/sruiEeMRAq
(DM me for a full copy beyond the paywall) h
8.2K views · 84 likes
· 8 reposts · 10 replies
Open on X →
@RebeccaRettig1 @m_mosier_ @malekanoms Yes, the privacy section matters a lot.
Regulators and auditors need access to the right evidence, but the entire market doesn’t need the same view.
That’s the approach we’ve taken at Dusk. Consensus remains permissionless, while financial
106 views · 10 likes
· 2 reposts · 0 replies
Open on X →
9/ We’re grateful to those who reviewed the paper & provided thoughtful feedback: @DanAwrey, @ccatalini, @jchervinsky, @sh0edog, @jillgun, @milesjennings, @MicheleKorver, @JaiMassari, @libraticlex, @bonnie_wynand, @amandatums, @retroszv, @millercwl & @pmwnyc. 🙏
689 views · 31 likes
· 0 reposts · 0 replies
Open on X →
7/ Attenuated, protocol-mediated contacts at the network layer — a validator selected by code, a fee set by protocol — are not the dealings these laws police. FinCEN & OFAC enforce against systemic, knowable failures, not good-faith participation on neutral infrastructure.
589 views · 21 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
8/ And institutions are already here: regulators have confirmed banks may run nodes, validate transactions & pay network fees, & major asset managers operate on permissionless networks today. The reward: resilience, interoperability, open competition & deeper liquidity.
621 views · 22 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
6/ The paper’s core thesis: financial institutions can use permissionless networks; concerns about financial integrity laws should not deter them & can be addressed under existing law through a risk-based compliance frameworks that place controls at the app layer.
642 views · 24 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
3/ This isn’t a new choice. A generation ago, institutions confronted an open, global, permissionless network anyone could join: the internet. They moved their businesses onto its open protocols & built controls at the application layer, around their customers & conduct.
1.3K views · 26 likes
· 1 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
5/ Nearly two decades after Bitcoin launched, openness remains the defining feature of public blockchains. Distributed data, cryptography & consensus all predate them. The novel contribution is permissionlessness: shared infrastructure open to incumbents & new entrants alike.
857 views · 23 likes
· 1 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
4/ That decision now appears so plainly correct that its contested origins are easy to forget. Financial institutions face the same decision again with permissionless blockchains — & it is just as clear: use is compatible with existing law & the benefits far outweigh the risks.
871 views · 22 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
2/ Institutions raise the same objections: network-layer exposure to illicit actors, asset provenance, onchain confidentiality. We answer each & set out a 9-point risk-management framework placing compliance controls at the app layer — the layer where institutions operate. 👇 http
17.8K views · 43 likes
· 1 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
1/ Today, @m_mosier_ @malekanoms & I are sharing a new paper: "The Compatibility of Financial Integrity With Permissionless Networks". Institutions say BSA & sanctions laws prevent use of these networks. We debunk this & provide a path forward. 🧵 https://t.co/8KAQH6UyDV
57.6K views · 213 likes
· 41 reposts · 21 replies
Open on X →
@RebeccaRettig1 @jito_sol Facts https://t.co/P3wOkWcazb
607 views · 5 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
5/ Extremely grateful to the unprecedented and talented legal minds that contributed to this report, and appreciative of the ability to work collaboratively with the administration & its regulators to move the industry forward.
1.1K views · 19 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
4/ I hope that this report sets a standard for how projects can engage with the market to build a more credible, trusted, and transparent system, and welcome open dialogue from the community on these issues.
1.2K views · 17 likes
· 0 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
3/ There's been an unprecedented amount of public discourse on the topic of how the securities laws apply to crypto arrangements & assets. Proud for the @jito_sol Foundation to contribute to the discussion & to provide full disclosure and analyses openly.
1K views · 17 likes
· 0 reposts · 3 replies
Open on X →
2/ The report analyzes why JitoSOL does not constitute an “investment contract” under the Howey test and, in the event the Reves test applies (which policy would dictate it should not), also does not constitute the type of “note” that is a security.
1.4K views · 21 likes
· 0 reposts · 3 replies
Open on X →
1/ As a crypto lawyer, I’ve craved a regulatory environment that welcomes disclosure & transparency -- core tenets of consumer protection & the crypto ethos. Today the @jito_sol Fnd published a report taking these tenets head on in re JitoSOL, an LST.
https://t.co/2MSP8wj33D ht
61.7K views · 542 likes
· 38 reposts · 265 replies
Open on X →
เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน
13 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม แสดงไปไกลเกินผู้ติดตามของตัวเอง และผู้ชมก็ตอบสนอง.
ยอดดูมัธยฐาน871บัญชีนี้924ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
การเข้าถึง, %5.25%บัญชีนี้3.62%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
การมีส่วนร่วม, %2.64%บัญชีนี้1.52%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
| ตัวชี้วัด | บัญชีนี้ | ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K | อัตราส่วน |
|---|---|---|---|
| ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์ | 871 | 924 | 0.94× |
| การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม) | 5.25% | 3.62% | 1.45× |
| อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม | 2.64% | 1.52% | 1.74× |
บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ → เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น → ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →
Growth & engagement
How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.
Views per post
60718 Mar
14.6K7 Aug
57.6K24 Aug
17.8K
871
857
1.3K
642
621
589
689
10627 Aug
8.2K3 Sep
1.7K9 Sep
Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.
Engagement rate per post
0.99%18 Mar
0.58%7 Aug
0.48%24 Aug
0.26%
2.64%
2.92%
2.22%
3.89%
3.70%
3.74%
4.50%
11.32%27 Aug
1.24%3 Sep
2.11%9 Sep
Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.
What the audience does
Likes65.9%1 235 in total
Reposts5.8%108 in total
Replies17.2%323 in total
Bookmarks11.1%208 in total
Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.
Followers by day
10 Sep
Daily snapshots since 10 Sep 2026; the dashed line is the starting count.
บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน
TEN ✓
@TEN_offcl
33.2K followers
· 221 posts
Michael Pyrcz🌻 ✓
@GeostatsGuy
33.2K followers
· 6.1K posts
steimer
@steimer
33.2K followers
· 15.9K posts
Crypto Chief | Official ✓
@Vance_007
33.1K followers
· 27.2K posts
Panda del Amor.
@PandaDelAmor17
33.1K followers
· 9K posts
Hillary Vaughn ✓
@hillary__vaughn
33.1K followers
· 1.9K posts
EXO Charts
@exochartstats
33.1K followers
· 8.2K posts
Dos30' ✓
@Dos30TV
33.1K followers
· 77.5K posts