tweetindex
ID

Retraction Watch

@RetractionWatch · New York · joined 07 Jan 2011

Daily newsletter https://t.co/T4dNEAd2zy Database https://t.co/Wx3LmYCtGk Tips team@retractionwatch.com (better than @ replies) Donate https://t.co/qh4sIBw1uU

94 782Followers
19Following
38 172Posts total
66.7KViews on collected posts

Postingan terbaru

Study by Duke's Dan Ariely retracted after sleuths find signs of data tampering. https://t.co/0ookLNOWYh 491 views · 10 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@RetractionWatch The level of fake studies in these pseudo scientific humanities psycho courses is insaaane 1.2K views · 21 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@RetractionWatch If I recall correctly, there were attempts to monetize this study via some self-help mobile apps including by the authors of the study. 2.2K views · 22 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@RetractionWatch This isn't new. A systems program had a biochemistry Phd. He quit the field when doing post-doctoral research he was pressured to change his data to match the professor's hypothesis. Said he didn't want to be in a profession where he had to lie to succeed 2K views · 16 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
A psychology journal has retracted a seminal 2002 paper on deadlines and procrastination coauthored by Dan Ariely of Duke University just days after a team of sleuths published analyses of the original study data, finding it had been tampered with. https://t.co/0ookLNOWYh 51.7K views · 669 likes · 122 reposts · 30 replies Open on X →
“Why retractions alone do not protect India’s scientific record.” https://t.co/a80RZuWv6g 3.6K views · 6 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
The U.S. Department of Commerce "quietly cut language banning political interference from the department's scientific integrity policy." https://t.co/tIRWaAxPY0 https://t.co/uVAFNCKowJ 2.6K views · 10 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
"Women make up less than one-fifth of last authorships in elite journals," analysis finds. https://t.co/cMk8MzYes9 2.8K views · 5 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Dibandingkan akun berukuran sama

8 postingan dari 90 hari terakhir, dibandingkan dengan rentang 10K–100K pengikut. di bawah akun sekelasnya baik pada jangkauan maupun interaksi.

Median tayangan2 427akun ini924median untuk 10K–100K
Jangkauan, %2.56%akun ini3.62%median untuk 10K–100K
Interaksi, %0.95%akun ini1.52%median untuk 10K–100K
MetrikAkun iniMedian untuk 10K–100KRasio
Median tayangan per postingan2 4279242.63×
Jangkauan (tayangan ÷ pengikut)2.56%3.62%0.71×
Tingkat interaksi0.95%1.52%0.63×

Akun lain pada rentang ini →   Bandingkan dengan akun lain →   Bagaimana tolok ukur ini disusun →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

2.8K3 Sep
2.6K
3.6K
51.7K
2K4 Sep
2.2K
1.2K
491

Last 8 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.32%3 Sep
0.53%
0.22%
1.65%
0.92%4 Sep
0.99%
1.69%
2.85%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes68.8%759 in total
Reposts11.9%131 in total
Replies3.0%33 in total
Quotes3.2%35 in total
Bookmarks13.1%145 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Akun serupa