Jill Barshay

@jillbarshay

I write about education research and data for @hechingerreport. Sign up for my newsletter https://t.co/oroqzxJtXQ

4 594Followers

1 807Following

4 137Posts total

17KViews on collected posts

Postingan terbaru

Jill Barshay@jillbarshay14 Jan 2025

Fuchs argues that the evidence for interventions is stronger and higher quality than the evidence for inclusion. (8/8) Read rebuttals from other scholars here: https://t.co/BhbQIIe66t 1.1K views · 15 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Jill Barshay@jillbarshay14 Jan 2025

Quality matters. A great version of inclusion where the general ed teacher is trained to accommodate disabilities will clearly outperform a chaotic separate, self-contained classroom, where students aren't getting much academic content at all. (5/8) 523 views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Jill Barshay@jillbarshay14 Jan 2025

Conversely, a great form of separate instruction, where students are getting the intensive services and interventions that they need will clearly outperform a bad version of inclusion where the general ed teacher is untrained and overwhelmed. (6/8) 469 views · 13 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Jill Barshay@jillbarshay14 Jan 2025

Great versions of either option -- inclusion or separate -- aren't that common in the real world. The public policy Q is where to invest: improve the gen ed classroom for all OR in reading and math interventions that might need to take place in separate classrooms. (7/8) 580 views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Jill Barshay@jillbarshay14 Jan 2025

It's not proof that inclusion is better if higher achieving students end up with higher test scores. You'd expect that. Just like you'd expect Harvard students to score better on the LSAT than community college students. That's not proof that Harvard is superior. (3/8) 594 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Jill Barshay@jillbarshay14 Jan 2025

Of course, you may care more about other outcomes like psychological and social benefits of learning with peers who are not disabled. This was a narrow review of the academic benefits. (4/8) 509 views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Jill Barshay@jillbarshay14 Jan 2025

Sometimes the majority of studies in a field can point in one direction and yet the studies can be similarly flawed. That's what Doug Fuchs @vupeabody argues in a forthcoming article in the Journal of Learning Disabilities about the evidence for special ed inclusion. 🧵 (1/8) 12.6K views · 35 likes · 11 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Jill Barshay@jillbarshay14 Jan 2025

The critique is that higher achieving children with disabilities tend to spend more time in gen ed classrooms, while children with more severe disabilities tend to spend more time in separate classrooms. The students aren't randomly assigned between the two settings. (2/8) 599 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

59914 Jan

12.6K

509

594

580

469

523

1.1K

Last 8 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.83%14 Jan

0.38%

1.38%

0.84%

1.21%

2.99%

1.91%

1.69%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views.

What the audience does

Likes69.8%90 in total

Reposts9.3%12 in total

Replies9.3%12 in total

Bookmarks11.6%15 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Postingan terbaru

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Akun serupa