Wiley in research ✓

@wileyinresearch · Global · joined 18 Aug 2015

We transform knowledge into accessible and actionable intelligence that powers progress.

20 748Followers

1 619Following

9 648Posts total

1.8KViews on collected posts

Postingan terbaru

Wiley in research ✓@wileyinresearch18 Sep

That's a wrap on Peer Review Week 2026! ✨ Over the past week, we've shared insights, resources, and perspectives on the value of peer review and the challenges facing the process today. Thank you to the reviewers, editors, and researchers who contribute their time and https:

385 views · 3 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Wiley in research ✓@wileyinresearch18 Sep

What makes a good peer review? Clear, constructive feedback and a strong understanding of the review process can make a meaningful difference for authors and the wider research community. Explore Wiley Researcher Academy's Peer Review Essentials course and build your https://

308 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Wiley in research ✓@wileyinresearch17 Sep

What factors influence whether a reviewer accepts an invitation to review? An analysis of more than 79,000 review invitations in Ecology and Evolution found that men and women were equally likely to accept review requests overall, but male reviewers were more likely to agree htt

463 views · 2 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Wiley in research ✓@wileyinresearch17 Sep

As submissions increase and expectations continue to grow, how can peer review keep up while maintaining quality and trust? Join Michael Willis and experts from across scholarly publishing for a candid conversation on peer review capacity, editorial decision making, and the http

302 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Wiley in research ✓@wileyinresearch16 Sep

Strengthening research integrity and peer review takes collaboration across the research community. In this interview, Maryam Sayab of the Asian Council of Science Editors (ACSE) and Wiley's Mike Streeter share their perspectives on building trust in research and supporting a h

367 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Dibandingkan akun berukuran sama

5 postingan dari 90 hari terakhir, dibandingkan dengan rentang 10K–100K pengikut. di bawah akun sekelasnya baik pada jangkauan maupun interaksi.

Median tayangan367akun ini924median untuk 10K–100K

Jangkauan, %1.77%akun ini3.62%median untuk 10K–100K

Interaksi, %0.33%akun ini1.52%median untuk 10K–100K

Metrik	Akun ini	Median untuk 10K–100K	Rasio
Median tayangan per postingan	367	924	0.40×
Jangkauan (tayangan ÷ pengikut)	1.77%	3.62%	0.49×
Tingkat interaksi	0.33%	1.52%	0.22×

Akun lain pada rentang ini → Bandingkan dengan akun lain → Bagaimana tolok ukur ini disusun →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

36716 Sep

30217 Sep

463

30818 Sep

385

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.00%16 Sep

0.33%17 Sep

0.86%

0.00%18 Sep

1.04%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes42.9%6 in total

Reposts21.4%3 in total

Bookmarks35.7%5 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.