tweetindex
IT

Jubal Hardin ✓

@Jubal_Hardin

Synthesist. Dedicated Polymath. Devout realist. Professional Jester. Amateur subversive. Bon vivant. Sybarite. Occasional Curmudgeon. Often whimsical.

4 420Followers
3 722Following
9 268Posts total
1.6MViews on collected posts

Ultimi post

@Jubal_Hardin I’m an engineer; my areas of expertise are thermodynamics and fluid mechanics. I’ve been working with these equations day in and day out for 30 years. The issues you mentioned have already been successfully addressed for years thanks to CFD. There won’t be any chan 23.6K views · 236 likes · 17 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
@Jubal_Hardin everything you say in this post was already solved and is already done with Navier-Stokes and has been for decades The result today is purely academic and none of the above will be materially affected whatsoever 1.5K views · 37 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@Jubal_Hardin Not really. This just shows that the NS equations don't accurately model the real world, and that things like infinite velocity, while now demonstrable as a solution, isn't possible in reality because physics works differently at atomic scales. Nothing will change 5K views · 78 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
What makes solving Navier-Stokes important? Fluid dynamics affects more than you realize in your everyday life. This breakthrough — if it is true — gives you: Cheaper, safer flying and driving. Air over a wing or around a car is a Navier-Stokes problem. Better control of that h
794K views · 6.1K likes · 841 reposts · 73 replies Open on X →
Solving Navier-Stokes is a real leap. Out of all the math problems AI has cracked so far, this is the first one that could actually help humanity in practice. Before this, AI was mostly brute-forcing one or two Erdős problems out of 1,200 with raw AI compute, and solving those 801.5K views · 966 likes · 60 reposts · 54 replies Open on X →

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

5 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di under 10K follower. arriva a più persone rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione.

Visualizzazioni mediane23 596questo account4 175mediana per under 10K
Copertura, %533.85%questo account250.82%mediana per under 10K
Interazione, %1.09%questo account1.41%mediana per under 10K
MetricaQuesto accountMediana per under 10KRapporto
Visualizzazioni mediane per post23 5964 1755.65×
Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower)5.3× audience2.5× audience2.13×
Tasso di interazione1.09%1.41%0.77×

Altri account di questa fascia →   Confronta con un altro account →   Come sono costruiti questi parametri →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

801.5K8 Sep
794K
5K
1.5K
23.6K

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.13%8 Sep
0.88%
1.56%
2.49%
1.09%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for under 10K accounts is 1.41%.

What the audience does

Likes68.5%7 418 in total
Reposts8.5%918 in total
Replies1.2%131 in total
Bookmarks21.8%2 367 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Account simili