Jubal Hardin ✓

@Jubal_Hardin

Synthesist. Dedicated Polymath. Devout realist. Professional Jester. Amateur subversive. Bon vivant. Sybarite. Occasional Curmudgeon. Often whimsical.

4 420Followers

3 722Following

9 268Posts total

1.6MViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

Jubal Hardin ✓@Jubal_Hardin8 Sep

@Jubal_Hardin I’m an engineer; my areas of expertise are thermodynamics and fluid mechanics. I’ve been working with these equations day in and day out for 30 years. The issues you mentioned have already been successfully addressed for years thanks to CFD. There won’t be any chan 23.6K views · 236 likes · 17 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →

Jubal Hardin ✓@Jubal_Hardin8 Sep

@Jubal_Hardin everything you say in this post was already solved and is already done with Navier-Stokes and has been for decades The result today is purely academic and none of the above will be materially affected whatsoever 1.5K views · 37 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Jubal Hardin ✓@Jubal_Hardin8 Sep

@Jubal_Hardin Not really. This just shows that the NS equations don't accurately model the real world, and that things like infinite velocity, while now demonstrable as a solution, isn't possible in reality because physics works differently at atomic scales. Nothing will change 5K views · 78 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Jubal Hardin ✓@Jubal_Hardin8 Sep

What makes solving Navier-Stokes important? Fluid dynamics affects more than you realize in your everyday life. This breakthrough — if it is true — gives you: Cheaper, safer flying and driving. Air over a wing or around a car is a Navier-Stokes problem. Better control of that h

794K views · 6.1K likes · 841 reposts · 73 replies Open on X →

Jubal Hardin ✓@Jubal_Hardin8 Sep

Solving Navier-Stokes is a real leap. Out of all the math problems AI has cracked so far, this is the first one that could actually help humanity in practice. Before this, AI was mostly brute-forcing one or two Erdős problems out of 1,200 with raw AI compute, and solving those 801.5K views · 966 likes · 60 reposts · 54 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

5 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง under 10K ผู้ติดตาม แสดงต่อคนมากกว่าบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน23 596บัญชีนี้4 175ค่ามัธยฐานของ under 10K

การเข้าถึง, %533.85%บัญชีนี้250.82%ค่ามัธยฐานของ under 10K

การมีส่วนร่วม, %1.09%บัญชีนี้1.41%ค่ามัธยฐานของ under 10K

ตัวชี้วัด	บัญชีนี้	ค่ามัธยฐานของ under 10K	อัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์	23 596	4 175	5.65×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)	5.3× audience	2.5× audience	2.13×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม	1.09%	1.41%	0.77×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ → เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น → ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

801.5K8 Sep

794K

1.5K

23.6K

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.13%8 Sep

0.88%

1.56%

2.49%

1.09%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for under 10K accounts is 1.41%.

What the audience does

Likes68.5%7 418 in total

Reposts8.5%918 in total

Replies1.2%131 in total

Bookmarks21.8%2 367 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

โพสต์ล่าสุด

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน