tweetindex
IT

Stat Arb ✓

@quant_arb · Zug · joined 26 Nov 2019

MFT & HFT | Views my own. Not financial advice.

71 189Followers
1 641Following
15 271Posts total
196.9KViews on collected posts

Ultimi post

have you been tokenmaxxing anon? https://t.co/HFDYtjKeNQ
6.6K views · 31 likes · 0 reposts · 11 replies Open on X →
Check out the site @Vertox_DF made for practicing for quant prep: https://t.co/Ti3mIjoOeW First contest is tomorrow 9.2K views · 42 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Important question, what are we naming our exchange adapter ‼️‼️‼️ 4.6K views · 11 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@quant_arb Yep! Plus overwhelming majority of traders are not quants nor are they institutional. For every top institutional quant, there may be 100+ discretionary traders. But if you live in a fish bowl (quant world), all you know is the fish bowl. And you can’t relate to anyt 7.6K views · 57 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
I can name 4 pods off the top of my head, 2 of which I’ve sat opposite in the office. That print or printed (as of my time there) like this very consistently and definitely didn’t run 3 Sharpe. 7.5K views · 51 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
At a lot of Chicago style shops, it’s just don’t hit your DD and how much PnL did you make. There’s very profitable teams out there which consistently have done very well for themselves and their firms without having infinite sharpes. Sometimes being willing to stomach some 30.2K views · 206 likes · 5 reposts · 8 replies Open on X →
I know extremely profitable desks (9 figs PnL) where they don’t check the Sharpe unless it’s a systematic strategy. It’s simply is the PnL positive every quarter. Seen multiple desks like this (often very discretionary) print like crazy. Not everyone runs quant books @ 3+ Sharpe 131.2K views · 574 likes · 16 reposts · 26 replies Open on X →

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

7 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di 10K–100K follower. arriva a molti, ma pochi di loro reagiscono.

Visualizzazioni mediane7 602questo account924mediana per 10K–100K
Copertura, %10.68%questo account3.62%mediana per 10K–100K
Interazione, %0.63%questo account1.52%mediana per 10K–100K
MetricaQuesto accountMediana per 10K–100KRapporto
Visualizzazioni mediane per post7 6029248.23×
Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower)10.68%3.62%2.95×
Tasso di interazione0.63%1.52%0.42×

Altri account di questa fascia →   Confronta con un altro account →   Come sono costruiti questi parametri →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

131.2K4 Sep
30.2K
7.5K
7.6K
4.6K7 Sep
9.2K
6.6K15 Sep

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.47%4 Sep
0.73%
0.71%
0.79%
0.26%7 Sep
0.48%
0.63%15 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes65.9%972 in total
Reposts1.5%22 in total
Replies3.5%51 in total
Quotes0.5%8 in total
Bookmarks28.6%422 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Account simili