tweetindex
PT

Adrian Soto-Mota

@AdrianSotoMota

MD, PhD, FACP. I lead the Metabolic Diseases Research Unit (@UIEMmx) and I am an Internal Medicine Consultant @incmnszmx. Prof @TecdeMonterrey.

9 270Followers
381Following
6 021Posts total
14.2KViews on collected posts

Posts recentes

@AdrianSotoMota @LauraBuchananMD @BioMedCentral Great study. But the real question is whether the lower cholesterol improves health or reduces risk. 1K views · 16 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@BioMedCentral Thank you to the patients who made this possible! https://t.co/L8LRquSKXZ @lipo_fan @JoshJwageman @LauraBuchananMD @DoctorTro @MattCalkinsMD @wakeforestmed @incmnszmx @TecdeMonterrey @UIEMmx Please help us share it 🙏🔄 https://t.co/qHP87TFUeB 1.6K views · 21 likes · 2 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@BioMedCentral Why? Chronically low insulin may shift the liver toward cholesterol ABSORPTION, not synthesis (via NPC1L1/ABCG5-G8) . Ezetimibe blocks that leg. This could be a useful insight for patients who can't or won't take statins. https://t.co/pcCoSC8kwB 2.6K views · 26 likes · 2 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@BioMedCentral Maybe high numbers just fall further? Nope. The lower-baseline half of the cohort dropped as steeply as the upper half. Maybe it was the statins? Also nope. 12 of 14 were on ezetimibe ALONE, and there the median drop was still −50.4% (95% CI −56.9 to −38.2). ht 1.9K views · 11 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@BioMedCentral Only 14 patients? Yes. But these are unusually well documented cases: serial fasting lipid panels, plasma sterol absorption markers, and genetic testing. No pathogenic LDLR, APOB or PCSK9 variants (n=10). No biallelic sitosterolemia. This is NOT undiagnosed 2K views · 13 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@BioMedCentral Mean follow-up 130 days and, ⬇️LDL-C: 254 → 127 mg/dL (−53.2%, 95% CI −61.1 to −40.9) ⬇️TC: 335 → 200 mg/dL (−38.5%) ⬇️TG: −23% ➡️HDL-C: −1.5% So the low-TG/high-HDL pattern of carb restriction stayed put. Only the LDL-C moved! https://t.co/lnxj9qqtuh 2.3K views · 13 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@BioMedCentral NO, this is not LMHRs. Because not all patients who adopt a ketogenic diet look alike, not all keto-diet-induced hypercholesterolemia cases are the same. https://t.co/XhGeeCpu2p 2.7K views · 16 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Em comparação com contas do mesmo porte

7 posts dos últimos 90 dias, ao lado da faixa de under 10K seguidores. abaixo dos pares tanto em alcance quanto em engajamento.

Mediana de visualizações2 035esta conta4 175mediana para under 10K
Alcance, %21.95%esta conta250.82%mediana para under 10K
Engajamento, %0.69%esta conta1.41%mediana para under 10K
MétricaEsta contaMediana para under 10KProporção
Mediana de visualizações por post2 0354 1750.49×
Alcance (visualizações ÷ seguidores)21.95%2.5× audience0.09×
Taxa de engajamento0.69%1.41%0.49×

Outras contas desta faixa →   Comparar com outra conta →   Como estas referências são construídas →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

2.7K25 Aug
2.3K
2K
1.9K
2.6K
1.6K
1K

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.64%25 Aug
0.64%
0.69%
0.64%
1.18%
1.58%
1.72%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for under 10K accounts is 1.41%.

What the audience does

Likes76.3%116 in total
Reposts3.3%5 in total
Replies6.6%10 in total
Quotes0.7%1 in total
Bookmarks13.2%20 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Contas semelhantes